{"id":2514,"date":"2019-11-21T10:39:50","date_gmt":"2019-11-21T18:39:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/?p=2514"},"modified":"2019-11-21T10:39:57","modified_gmt":"2019-11-21T18:39:57","slug":"the-wealth-tax-and-the-museum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2019\/11\/the-wealth-tax-and-the-museum\/","title":{"rendered":"The wealth tax and the museum"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

At Bloomberg, Tyler Cowen has a short post<\/a> on some unintended consequences of a wealth tax. It’s an idea being talked about in the Democratic candidate debates. In the US we do have a few wealth taxes already: local property taxes, and, for the very, very wealthy, estate taxes. But a stand-alone wealth tax would be something new.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cowen has an unusual take. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the estate tax comes up for debate, whether to increase its rate and lower its threshold, or, on the other side, to eliminate it entirely, one of the issues that comes up is the likely effect on charitable donations. Since donations are fully deductible from the tax base, the consensus (and empirical evidence) is that increasing the tax rate, or having it apply to more people, would increase the amount people bequeath to charities instead of their families. Art museums, for example, get a bit nervous when anyone starts to advocate for the elimination of the estate tax. Cowen does not disagree with this, so far. What’s unusual in this article is that he posits that the increase in charitable donations that would likely follow from a wealth tax (that held donations to be tax deductible) would be harmful<\/em> to nonprofits. How?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many nonprofits are inefficient, have poorly defined goals and lack accountability. In this new world, they also would be spending more time and money chasing after donor dollars. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Well … this seems to need a bit of fleshing out. No one denies that there are nonprofits that are poorly run. But it has often been pointed out that one of the beauties of the US system of extensive use of the nonprofit sector is that donors serve as an oversight mechanism, rewarding the well-run, on-mission organizations at the expense of the others. One economist<\/a> even referred to the US system of subsidizing arts nonprofits through giving donors a tax incentive as the “genius of the American system.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He continues:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wealthy donors might be more likely to pressure nonprofits for luxury consumption experiences, for example. Many nonprofits sponsor cruises to Alaska or the Caribbean for their donors, as a method of fundraising and also for building good will and networking. There\u2019s nothing inherently wrong with that. But the pressures would rise for those cruise experiences to be much more luxurious \u2014 think freshly caught sushi, Rolling Stones concerts and private butlers. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

It’s plausible I suppose – more rents in the system induce more expenditures on rent seeking. But we seem to be in the realm of second-order problems here. Turning to the art market in particular:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Or imagine how art markets might be affected by a wealth tax. Rather than keeping their art collections private, many more billionaires would donate that art to museums and other nonprofits. This appears to be a good outcome. But it would exacerbate one of the art world\u2019s worst problems, which is inflated appraisals for tax purposes. At any rate, America\u2019s museums do not have the space or resources to display and look after all of these paintings and sculptures; it is already common for a museum to display no more than 5% or 10% of its collection.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Essentially, a lot of art would be removed from circulation, stored in warehouses largely for tax reasons. Along the way, Christie\u2019s and Sotheby\u2019s might go bankrupt, as well as many art galleries, as the demand to buy art would plummet. You may think that the demise of a few galleries and auction houses is a small price to pay to reduce wealth inequality. But consider that artists, too, need to make a living.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Again, the big effect – more art would be donated to museums, for all to enjoy – is put aside for the second-order side consequences. Inflated appraisals for tax purposes? But that can be dealt with through an appropriate evaluation mechanism that need not falter simply because there are more evaluations to do. Not enough museum space? Is that really going to be a reason to oppose policies that encourage donations? First of all, more space can be converted to use, and it could bring to view newly available works, relegating others, temporarily, to storage. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the demand to buy art would plummet how exactly? I don’t get the mechanism whereby under current rules, I would be willing to pay $500,000 for a particular work, tax law changes such that I have added incentive to donate work at some future point, and so my reservation price for the painting falls? I think Christie’s, Sotheby’s, and struggling artists can rest easy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now all of the article puts aside the fact that the public sector would have more resources to do things. And yes, it’s not perfectly efficient either. But it is really the whole point of the proposed tax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I like reading Tyler Cowen – he puts interesting ideas into circulation, takes a global multi-faceted view of the economy, society and culture, and doesn’t shy from being contrary to the crowd. But this article is pretty thin, lacking all sense of relative proportion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

At Bloomberg, Tyler Cowen has a short post on some unintended consequences of a wealth tax. It’s an idea being talked about in the Democratic candidate debates. In the US we do have a few wealth taxes already: local property taxes, and, for the very, very wealthy, estate taxes. But a stand-alone wealth tax would […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2515,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2514","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-issues","8":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/reading-the-will.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3dIW5-Ey","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1577,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/10\/art-and-the-estate-tax\/","url_meta":{"origin":2514,"position":0},"title":"Art and the estate tax (updated, again)","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"October 7, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"The New York Times reports on the Elkins case, involving a victory for a wealthy family in a legal fight with the IRS on estate tax owing on a valuable art collection. This is the quote that caught my attention: \u201cMy genuine view is this is a great result for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"'cause I'm the taxman...","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/IRS.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/IRS.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/IRS.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1570,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/10\/tax-deductions-for-artists\/","url_meta":{"origin":2514,"position":1},"title":"Tax deductions for artists (updated)","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"October 7, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"The New York Times reports on a court case involving whether an artist working for salary as teaching faculty can claim tax deductions of artist's expenses (for supplies, travel, meals, etc) in excess of profits earned on sales of art. My understanding of this (tax people please correct me if\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"operates at a loss","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Goat.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1357,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/06\/earmarked-taxes-for-the-arts\/","url_meta":{"origin":2514,"position":2},"title":"Earmarked taxes for the arts","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"June 18, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Last night Mecklenburg County (where Charlotte, NC is) commissioners voted to approve a referendum on increasing the sales tax by a quarter of a cent, some of which would be dedicated to culture: 7.5% of the proceeds to the Arts & Science Council and 5% of the proceeds to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"I admit only having been to the airport","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/charlotte-north-carolina.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/charlotte-north-carolina.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/charlotte-north-carolina.jpeg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":696,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2013\/04\/internet-sales-should-be-taxed\/","url_meta":{"origin":2514,"position":3},"title":"Internet sales should be taxed","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"April 21, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"The Washington Post reports that the Senate is soon to vote on the issue of sales taxes on goods sold over the internet: The Senate is planning to vote on a bill as soon as Monday that would give states the authority to collect sales taxes on all Internet purchases,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"new shoes!","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/package_from_zappos-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1170,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/03\/taxing-music-downloads\/","url_meta":{"origin":2514,"position":4},"title":"Taxing Music Downloads","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"March 24, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Europeans have been able to avoid high home-country tax rates on downloads of songs and books by purchasing through Luxembourg. The UK wants to put a stop to that. The Guardian reports: George Osborne's latest\u00a0budget\u00a0could spell an end to 99p song\u00a0downloads\u00a0by closing a tax loophole that meant consumers were paying\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"get your downloads here","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Luxembourg.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":3667,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2024\/12\/on-indirect-support-for-the-arts\/","url_meta":{"origin":2514,"position":5},"title":"On “indirect” support for the arts","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"December 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Thomas Wolf has\u00a0posted a short piece\u00a0on the history of the National Endowment for the Arts, whether it is likely to survive the coming second Trump administration, and the tax deduction for charitable contributions. I\u2019m going to focus on that last bit\u2026 People who itemize their income tax deductions can claim\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/image-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/image-3.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/image-3.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/image-3.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2514"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2514\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2518,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2514\/revisions\/2518"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}