{"id":1390,"date":"2014-06-30T12:01:40","date_gmt":"2014-06-30T19:01:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/?p=1390"},"modified":"2014-06-30T12:01:40","modified_gmt":"2014-06-30T19:01:40","slug":"droit-de-suite-revisited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/06\/droit-de-suite-revisited\/","title":{"rendered":"Droit de Suite revisited"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"We're<\/a>Today at Slate, Whitney Kimball tries to make the case for US adoption of resale royalties for visual artists<\/a>, or droit de suite:<\/p>\n

\n

In what would become the first scandalously record-breaking Sotheby\u2019s art auction in 1973, taxi magnate Robert Scull and his wife famously made a fortune on 50 artworks from their collection, which included Robert Rauschenberg\u2019s painting\u00a0Thaw<\/em>. There, the artist watched as his piece, which he had initially sold for $900, hammered out for a whopping $85,000. As the story goes, Rauschenberg famously shoved Scull and shouted something along the lines of: \u201cI\u2019ve been working my ass off just for you to make that profit!\u201d (The\u00a0exact<\/a>\u00a0quotevaries<\/a>, but you get the drift.) Rauschenberg didn\u2019t see a dime from that auction; unlike authors and composers, American artists get no cut of their future sales.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

\n

This is because\u00a0U.S. copyright law<\/a>\u00a0protects \u201cpublished\u201d works, and a work of art is not \u201cpublished,\u201d simply made and sold\u2014so once a work of art is out of an artist\u2019s hands, the future profits, too, are gone. This system is unique to the art world; in other fields, artists are understood to have the right to a share of the proceeds of their works long after the works are first made. It makes perfect sense, for example, that the Isley Brothers would keep making royalties off \u201cShout,\u201d even though it wasn\u2019t a chart-topper when they released it in 1959 (it didn\u2019t become iconic until it was featured in\u00a0Animal House<\/a><\/em>\u00a0in 1978), or that Joan Didion would keep collecting money off\u00a0Slouching Towards Bethlehem<\/em><\/a>, which was published when she was 34, before her legend was secure. In the music world, a minor scandal arose when Chuck Berry was cheated out of part of his royalty rights for \u201cMaybellene<\/a>.\u201d In the art world, everybody is Chuck Berry. …<\/p>\n

Sure, for most artists, large secondary markets are a best case scenario. But only amultibillion-dollar-a-year industry<\/a>\u00a0would force us to re-examine a kindergartener\u2019s understanding of ethics. Whether artists are successful or unsuccessful, making millions or pennies, they deserve to share in the money their work generates. \u201cThe A.R.T. Act won’t benefit every artist, unfortunately, but this is not an anti-poverty program,\u201d Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), sponsor of the failed 2011 Equity for Visual Artists Act, told me over the phone. \u201cThis is a fairness and equity program. Just because we can’t bring in everybody doesn’t mean we should bring in nobody.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The article misses some key points; droit de suite is more complex than a ‘kindergartener’s understanding of ethics.’<\/p>\n

First, recorded works such as songs, films, and essays, that are reproducible at close to zero marginal cost, are not the same as unique works of visual art – they are distributed by different means, through very different intermediaries, and traded in very different markets. To say that we ought to have similar rules governing contracts for music recordings and paintings because they are both ‘art’ doesn’t make any sense (or, if it does, the author certainly hasn’t made the case here, except by assertion).<\/p>\n

Second, there are effects beyond what Ms Kimball envisions. Suppose the going price for houses similar to mine is currently $250,000, and I put it on the market. Suppose a law is then passed that says I am entitled to a share of any profits the buyer of my house might reap on a subsequent resale. What happens to that $250,000 market price? Of course it would drop, as the new law has reduced the value of this house as an asset. Paintings are no different. If works are being acquired, at least partly in the hope that they will increase in market value, then the initial price will be impacted by a law that decrees the artist is entitled to a share of future retail profits. Now you might think that effect will be large or small. But if you are writing an article about resale royalties, you should at least address the question.<\/p>\n

Third, the author should look at risk and regret. Suppose there are two different schemes by which artists could be rewarded. In regime A, they get little money up front, but are entitled to royalties on resale. In regime B, they get more money up front, but have no rights to resale royalties. If we are in regime B, then of course<\/em> artists who, in the long run, have made it big, will say ‘we really ought to have regime A,’ just as artists who in the long run are not successful will, after the fact<\/em>, prefer regime A to regime B. Resale royalties are a mechanism by which artists bear some of the risk in how the value of their works increases over time. If, in the end, the works have become valuable, they will then say ‘I wish I had taken that risk.’ But it doesn’t make it the best system for all artists in the long run.<\/p>\n

Markets for all creative goods deal with the issue of uncertainty as to the long run value of works. The risks arising from that uncertainty have to be distributed somehow, and the contractual systems we observe are to a large degree the result of efficient risk-bearing (Richard Caves’ Creative Industries<\/em><\/a> is an excellent source on this topic).<\/p>\n

My previous post on the topic (sorry for being repetitive) is here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Today at Slate, Whitney Kimball tries to make the case for US adoption of resale royalties for visual artists, or droit de suite: In what would become the first scandalously record-breaking Sotheby\u2019s art auction in 1973, taxi magnate Robert Scull and his wife famously made a fortune on 50 artworks from their collection, which included […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1392,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1390","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-issues","8":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/auction.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3dIW5-mq","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1074,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/02\/droit-de-suite\/","url_meta":{"origin":1390,"position":0},"title":"Droit de suite","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"February 27, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Legislation is proposed to bring droit de suite - a rule in which some artists receive a share of proceeds from some resales of their art - to the United States. The New York Times reports here, and blog neighbour Lee Rosenbaum analyses the proposal here. I will just deal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"beast of burden","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/auction.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/auction.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/auction.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":4651,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2026\/02\/he-is-beyond-satire\/","url_meta":{"origin":1390,"position":1},"title":"He is beyond satire","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"February 5, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Olga Neuwirth has composed an opera, \u201cMonster\u2019s Paradise\u201d, with a libretto written by her and Elfriede Jelinek. You can see in the photo above, what it\u2019s about. It is premiering at the Hamburg Opera, before going to Zurich and Vienna, and on their website there\u2019s a two-minute video that gives\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2294,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2018\/02\/artists-as-speculators\/","url_meta":{"origin":1390,"position":2},"title":"Artists as speculators","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"February 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"A new working paper from Amy Whitaker and Roman\u00a0Kr\u00e4ussl suggests a new model of finance for visual artists (described by Isaac Kaplan in Artsy here). The abstract of the paper (free download here) is: Using unique historical sales data from the Leo Castelli Gallery, we introduce a novel model of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Hockney's are up three basis points","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/traders.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/traders.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/traders.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/traders.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/traders.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/traders.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1926,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2015\/12\/the-creative-class-wont-save-your-arts-organizations\/","url_meta":{"origin":1390,"position":3},"title":"The creative class won’t save your arts organizations","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"December 22, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Let's talk about Hartford. I've never been to Connecticut, but in the past week I have read two stories about Hartford, and it is interesting to think about the links, if any. First, the symphony is in financial troubles. Dan Haar of the Hartford Courant reports, \"The symphony is bleeding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"The greatest","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/howe.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1162,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2014\/03\/creativity-craft-and-the-quants\/","url_meta":{"origin":1390,"position":4},"title":"Creativity, Craft, and the Quants","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"March 22, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"In the New York Times, Timothy Egan worries we stifle creativity in the search for expert quantitative analysis. He writes, in \"Creativity vs. Quants\": Here\u2019s how\u00a0John Lennon\u00a0wrote \u201cNowhere Man,\u201d as he recalled it in an interview that ran just before he was murdered in 1980: After working five hours trying\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"suppose we begin a cappella?","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/lennon-rubber-soul.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4655,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/2026\/02\/reading-brink-lindseys-the-permanent-problem\/","url_meta":{"origin":1390,"position":5},"title":"Reading Brink Lindsey’s The Permanent Problem","author":"Michael Rushton","date":"February 23, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Brink Lindsey\u00a0takes his title\u00a0from one of my favourite essays, John Maynard Keynes\u2019s \u201cEconomic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren\u201d (which I wrote about\u00a0here). Keynes, in 1930, wondered what lives might be like in\u00a0our\u00a0present. There are three big predictions in the essay, interrelated, of which I would say he got two right, which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "issues"","block_context":{"text":"issues","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/category\/issues\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-2.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/image-2.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1390"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1390\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/worth\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}