{"id":353,"date":"2010-03-25T11:20:12","date_gmt":"2010-03-25T15:20:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp\/2010\/03\/the_nose_the_trojans_and_issue\/"},"modified":"2010-03-25T11:20:12","modified_gmt":"2010-03-25T15:20:12","slug":"the_nose_the_trojans_and_issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/2010\/03\/the_nose_the_trojans_and_issue.html","title":{"rendered":"The Nose, The Trojans, and Issues of Popularity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Leaving aside the problem that William Kentridge&#8217;s spectacular production of <em>The Nose <\/em>at the Metropolitan Opera overwhelms Shostakovich&#8217;s 1928 chamber opera, leaving aside  that one departs the house with the questionable sensation of having seen inspired stagecraft inflicted on a weak work, I merely wish to observe a series of paradoxes.<br \/>\n<em>The Nose <\/em>at the Met, with six performances, is such a hot show you can&#8217;t buy a ticket. An even greater surprise, alas, is that there were swaths of empty seats at Carnegie Hall earlier this month when Valery Gergiev (who also conducted <em>The Nose<\/em>) led his Kirov forces in a gripping two-night traversal of Berlioz&#8217;s underperformed masterpiece <em>The Trojans<\/em>. Gergiev&#8217;s transporting rendition of Berlioz&#8217;s <em>Romeo and Juliet <\/em>at Carnegie in February also failed to fill the house. Neither <em>The Trojans <\/em>nor <em>Romeo<\/em> was staged. (Cf. my <em>Trojans<\/em> blog of March 14.)<br \/>\nLast season the Met gave us Robert LePage&#8217;s staging of Berlioz&#8217;s <em>Damnation of Faust <\/em>&#8211; a production festooned with magic tricks and yet innocent of Faust&#8217;s torments (my review appeared in the <a href=\"http:\/\/josephhorowitz.com\/up_files\/File\/archives\/Doctor%20Atomic.pdf\">Times Literary Supplement<\/a>.) Around the same time, Gergiev led the Kirov Orchestra and Chorus in Prokofiev&#8217;s <em>Alexander Nevsky <\/em>at Fisher Hall &#8211; a performance so right in timbre, so intense in feeling and projection, so searing in affect as to eclipse all memory of the Eisenstein film.<br \/>\nNext season the Met gives us the first two installments of a Lepage <em>Ring<\/em>. The most eager expectations of this heralded event are the most disturbing &#8211; Lepage&#8217;s Nibelheim, Lepage&#8217;s dragon, Lepage&#8217;s Ride of the Valkyries, Lepage&#8217;s Magic Fire. It would be a gauche understatement to suggest that the Ring is no more about those than <em>The Damnation of Faust <\/em>is about its Ride to the Abyss; unlike Berlioz, unlike Shostakovich, Wagner is a psychologist of genius.<br \/>\nNot long ago Gergiev toured a Kirov <em>Ring<\/em> whose inept staging diminished musical and psychological impact both. Those performances would have been stronger in concert. A friend who admires <em>The Nose <\/em>listened at the Met with his eyes shut. With his <em>brain.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Leaving aside the problem that William Kentridge&#8217;s spectacular production of The Nose at the Metropolitan Opera overwhelms Shostakovich&#8217;s 1928 chamber opera, leaving aside that one departs the house with the questionable sensation of having seen inspired stagecraft inflicted on a weak work, I merely wish to observe a series of paradoxes. The Nose at the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-353","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QLHN-5H","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}