{"id":3402,"date":"2025-02-07T00:06:33","date_gmt":"2025-02-07T05:06:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/?p=3402"},"modified":"2025-02-07T00:06:36","modified_gmt":"2025-02-07T05:06:36","slug":"the-erosion-of-the-american-arts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/2025\/02\/the-erosion-of-the-american-arts.html","title":{"rendered":"The Erosion of the American Arts"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"976\" height=\"549\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-2.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3407\" style=\"width:670px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-2.png 976w, https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-2-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/image-2-768x432.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 976px) 100vw, 976px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p><em>The new issue of the online New American Studies Journal is devoted to the challenged fate of the arts. I append an overview of my contribution on \u201cThe Erosion of the American Arts.\u201d To read the whole article, click <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/nasjournal.org\/NASJ\/article\/view\/2091\/1811\">here<\/a><em>. To see the whole issue, click <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/nasjournal.org\/NASJ\/issue\/view\/173\">here<\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The&nbsp;gripping cover story&nbsp;of the 2024 December issue of&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic&nbsp;<\/em>is \u201cHow the Ivy League Broke America.\u201d David Brooks, its distinguished author, characteristically adapts a purview broader, more based in political and cultural memory, than that of other pundits. Here, he applies a fresh historical perspective to our current national crisis, arguing that an exaggerated emphasis on intellectual aptitude, traceable to the educational priorities of Harvard President James Conant (1933\u20131953), fostered a new \u201cmeritocracy\u201d\u2014an American ruling class defective in other human virtues. \u201cIs your IQ the most important thing about you?\u201d Brooks asks. He answers: \u201cNo. I would submit that it\u2019s your desires\u2014what you are interested in, what you love. We want a meritocracy that will help each person identify, nurture, and pursue the ruling passion of their soul.\u201d&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Brooks is addressing the rampaging malaise that all acknowledge\u2014friendlessness and depression; opioid addiction and rage; political and governmental dysfunction. The diagnoses he adduces (packed with social science statistics) are more compelling than the remedies he glimpses. And one obvious source of remediation is hiding in plain sight:&nbsp;<strong>Amid a dozen pages of dense argumentation, Brooks only once drops the word \u201cart.\u201d&nbsp;<\/strong>And yet, it seems to me obvious that a rapid erosion of the American arts as previously experienced\u2014in child-rearing, education, and higher education; in civic identity; in media and social media; and in our daily lives\u2014is a crucial impediment to nurturing \u201cwhat you love\u201d and pursuing \u201cthe ruling passion\u201d of the soul. And I find myself ever more mindful of how fundamentally exposure to the arts has diminished during my own lifetime.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A tidal continuum submerging the arts with entertainment may be traced in stages from silent film to film with sound, then color; to TV with its laugh and applause tracks: to youtube, with its loud and irrelevant ads; to social media and the segmentation of Americans into consumers of political and cultural pabulum. The ease with which entertainment pays commercial dividends, the alacrity with which it can today be produced and acquired, are fatal enticements. At every stage, engagement grows ever more supine.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Are these impediments deeply rooted in the American experience, even within the very ethos of democracy and freedom? Certainly there is an impressive lineage of writings analyzing an American aversion to artists and intellectuals. An enduring philosophical argument against the American arts was launched by Theodor Adorno and the Frankfurt School. Much more recently, positing \u201ca new theory of modernism,\u201d the German sociologist Hartmut Rosa calls the governing dynamic \u201csocial acceleration\u201d \u2013 and his prognoses are grim.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With so much at stake, where does hope lie? Contrary to what might be thought or assumed, it cannot be said that America was never a fit home for the arts. During the Gilded Age, no one pondering issues of shared American identity would consider omitting the arts. In the decades after World War I, the arts were more widely but also more superficially acquired.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In my essay, I emphasize the possibilities for innovation in his own field: orchestras. They were once an American bellwether. Two recent controversies drive home the moment \u2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/2024\/03\/whats-an-orchestra-for-mulling-esa-pekka-salonens-resignation-from-the-san-francisco-symphony.html\">the\u00a0resignation of Esa-Pekka Salonen<\/a>\u00a0as music director of the San Francisco Symphony, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/2024\/04\/the-chicago-symphony-lands-klaus-makela.html\">the\u00a0engagement of Klaus Makela<\/a>\u00a0as music director of the Chicago Symphony. Curating the American musical past, comparable to the efforts of art museums, remains unattempted. A case in point is the Charles Ives Sesquicentenary, ignored by the major US orchestras.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The new issue of the online New American Studies Journal is devoted to the challenged fate of the arts. I append an overview of my contribution on \u201cThe Erosion of the American Arts.\u201d To read the whole article, click here. To see the whole issue, click here. The&nbsp;gripping cover story&nbsp;of the 2024 December issue of&nbsp;The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-3402","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry","8":"has-post-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QLHN-SS","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3402"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3402\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3411,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3402\/revisions\/3411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}