{"id":1174,"date":"2018-09-18T17:30:14","date_gmt":"2018-09-18T21:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/?p=1174"},"modified":"2018-09-18T17:30:14","modified_gmt":"2018-09-18T21:30:14","slug":"rachmaninoff-uncorked","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/2018\/09\/rachmaninoff-uncorked.html","title":{"rendered":"Rachmaninoff Uncorked"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Today’s “Wall Street Journal” includes my review of “one of the most searing listening experiences in the history of recorded sound” — the new Marston Records 3-CD set: “Rachmaninoff Plays Symphonic Dances” — which you can sample here. <\/strong><\/a>My review reads:<\/em><\/p>\n

One of the saddest and most paradoxical artistic exiles of the 20th century was Sergei Rachmaninoff, who fled the Russian Revolution and wound up in New York and Los Angeles, in equal measure celebrated and obscure.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Rachmaninoff (1873-1943) left Moscow a composer and conductor of high consequence who also played the piano. Yet in America he barely conducted and his compositional output plummeted. To earn a living, he turned himself into a keyboard virtuoso of singular fame and attainment\u2014a late embodiment of the heroic Romantic piano lineage beginning with Franz Liszt. Offstage, he retained a lonely Russian home and Russian customs. His severe crewcut and gimlet eyes disclosed little to the world at large. His personal poise was awesome and implacable.<\/p>\n

Rachmaninoff\u2019s privacy took other forms. He refused permission to have his concerts broadcast, effectively preventing any documentation of what he sounded like in live performance. Instead, he recorded extensively for RCA. But, absent the oxygen a body of listeners can activate, those readings are as celebrated for their emotional control as for their sovereign interpretive mastery. They enshrine kaleidoscopic miracles of color and texture wedded to a vice-like command of musical structure. But the cap remains on the bottle.<\/p>\n

No longer. A decade ago, a researcher was browsing a collection left by the conductor Eugene Ormandy to the University of Pennsylvania\u2014and read: \u201c33 1\/3:12\/21\/40: Symphonic Dances…Rachmaninoff in person playing the piano.\u201d That is: Ormandy had privately recorded Rachmaninoff playing through his \u201cSymphonic Dances\u201d prior to Ormandy\u2019s premiere performance with the Philadelphia Orchestra in January 1941. This turned out to be no morsel, but 26 minutes of a 35-minute composition. And it\u2019s now embedded in a three-CD Marston set titled \u201cRachmaninoff Plays Symphonic Dances.\u201d The result is one of the most searing listening experiences in the history of recorded sound.<\/p>\n

Most of the best piano recordings are made in concert. They\u2019re not as perfect as studio products, but by and large they\u2019re more spontaneous, more intense, more creative. Vladimir Horowitz, an intimate friend, claimed that only one of Rachmaninoff\u2019s commercial recordings\u2014that of the second movement of his own First Concerto, recorded in 1939-40\u2014gave a fair impression. If you listen to that recording<\/strong><\/a>, you\u2019ll easily ascertain what Horowitz was talking about\u2014the opening solo is untethered.<\/p>\n

As privately imparted to Ormandy, Rachmaninoff\u2019s impromptu solo-piano rendering of his \u201cSymphonic Dances\u201d documents roaring cataracts of sound, massive chording, and pounding accents powered by a demonic thrust the likes of which no studio environment has ever fostered. Rachmaninoff\u2019s humbling presence, re-encountered, is gigantic, cyclopean.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

And there is more: the piece itself; it is Rachmaninoff\u2019s valedictory. Summoning his waning creative energies in this last major work, he fashioned his musical testament. The dances originally bore titles: \u201cMidday,\u201d Twilight,\u201d \u201cMidnight.\u201d These are stations of life. The finale ends in a blaze of glory; near the close, Rachmaninoff inscribed: \u201cAlliluya.\u201d<\/p>\n

But the work\u2019s most poignant moment comes in the first movement coda, which cites and pacifies the \u201cvengeance\u201d motto of the confessional First Symphony, a youthful effusion Rachmaninoff discarded following its disastrous 1897 premiere. It is music as naked as the nostalgic Rachmaninoff of the Second Piano Concerto is decorous: a baring of the soul. The First Symphony was completely unknown in 1940 (only in 1944 was a set of parts discovered). And so Rachmaninoff\u2019s allusion in the \u201cSymphonic Dances\u201d is a soul-baring even more private than his piano-rehearsal with Ormandy. In terms of his creative odyssey\u2014his exile and accommodation in a strange land\u2014it is nothing less than a closing of the circle.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

How does Rachmaninoff himself perform this secret passage, the meaning of which was his alone? Very slowly, lingeringly. Even more affecting is his treatment of the movement\u2019s second subject,<\/strong> a long saxophone melody he invests with a heaving surge and ebb of feeling, imparting a trembling undertow of anguish, of memories faraway and yet unresolved. The second movement waltz, under Rachmaninoff\u2019s fingers, is an essay in macabre shadow-play. The final dance is primal. The work emerges as an iconic leavetaking as bittersweet as any Mahler Abschied.<\/p>\n

I own a 10-volume 1954 edition of \u201cGrove\u2019s Dictionary of Music\u201d that allots to \u201cRakhmaninov\u201d less than a page. It contains the sentence: “The enormous popular success some few of [his] works had in his lifetime is not likely to last, and musicians never regarded it with much favour.\u201d Today that sentiment is as forgettable as Rachmaninoff is imperishable.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The little box containing these Rachmaninoff memories within memories includes other rarities. I cannot imagine a better introduction to this artist at his true worth. It stands as a rebuke to the slickness that often passes for Rachmaninoff interpretation nowadays. More than a lost art, it documents a lost world.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Today’s “Wall Street Journal” includes my review of “one of the most searing listening experiences in the history of recorded sound” — the new Marston Records 3-CD set: “Rachmaninoff Plays Symphonic Dances” — which you can sample here. My review reads: One of the saddest and most paradoxical artistic exiles of the 20th century was […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1174","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry","8":"has-post-thumbnail"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2QLHN-iW","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1174"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1174\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1188,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1174\/revisions\/1188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/uq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}