{"id":340,"date":"2010-02-09T13:34:19","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T21:34:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp\/2010\/02\/so_what_constitutes_artistic_s\/"},"modified":"2010-02-09T13:34:19","modified_gmt":"2010-02-09T21:34:19","slug":"so_what_constitutes_artistic_s","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/2010\/02\/so_what_constitutes_artistic_s\/","title":{"rendered":"Does Sustainability Mean Artistic Success?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My recent post, Too Big to Succeed, generated some discussion about what constitutes success.&nbsp; I believe organizations would likely define success as implementation of their mission at the highest level permitted by their finances.&nbsp; Does this make sense?&nbsp; Yes, of course, but it&nbsp; obfuscates the delicate relationships within the production of the artistic product, its relationship to money and organizational size. <\/p>\n<p>We have become accustomed to a certain kind of thinking, that in order to perform or exhibit a challenging contemporary work, it must be balanced by something equally traditional or standard.&nbsp; As soon as a decision is made to premiere a play by a new, but promising playwright, the decision is made to program an <i>Our Town<\/i>.&nbsp; Or in the musical world, why is every contemporary work paired with one by Beethoven. There&#8217;s something inherently wrong about this commonly-accepted equation.<\/p>\n<p>I would argue that artistic success is the true fulfillment of an organization&#8217;s mission and that in fulfilling it, its honesty and power can, and should attract needed financial support. However, a necessary condition to this equation is that the organization must appropriately size itself. Unfortunately, as I stated in my previous blog, it appears that there is a point in an organization&#8217;s growth when pragmatic thinking overwhelms this line of action and implementation.&nbsp; Growth in the NFP arts sector has meant, almost without exception, growth in size, not growth in depth. Internally-focused organizational forces drive growth in size, and are usually explained as mission-driven to reach a wider audience. Unfortunately the result of this development is a standardized way of planning and action that is inculcated into all facets of the arts world.&nbsp; Only the rarest arts administration textbook or resource does not reflect and support this line of thinking.&nbsp; It&#8217;s called <u>sustainability<\/u>.<\/p>\n<p>My concern: because determination of artistic quality is so difficult, and so PC super-charged, funders and others who determine arts sector thinking gravitate to sustainability as a definition of success.<\/p>\n<p>Isn&#8217;t it time we start to ask the really tough questions. Isn&#8217;t it time we started to value the quality of the artistic expression, not the &#8220;art&#8221; of sustainability? <\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; <br \/>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My recent post, Too Big to Succeed, generated some discussion about what constitutes success.&nbsp; I believe organizations would likely define success as implementation of their mission at the highest level permitted by their finances.&nbsp; Does this make sense?&nbsp; Yes, of course, but it&nbsp; obfuscates the delicate relationships within the production of the artistic product, its [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-340","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}