{"id":339,"date":"2010-02-03T14:38:19","date_gmt":"2010-02-03T22:38:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp\/2010\/02\/too_big_to_succeed\/"},"modified":"2010-02-03T14:38:19","modified_gmt":"2010-02-03T22:38:19","slug":"too_big_to_succeed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/2010\/02\/too_big_to_succeed\/","title":{"rendered":"Too Big To Succeed?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have appreciated the many comments that my first blog engendered.&nbsp; My initial outline for future postings included &#8220;ranting&#8221; a bit about the systemic issues that make the standard NFP model dysfunctional, and then post some new and emerging models I&#8217;ve discovered.&nbsp; These models range from those currently in action to those still in construction.&nbsp; For artistic entities, the ultimate goal is to understand what one&#8217;s or one&#8217;s organization&#8217;s structural needs are in relation to mission, then either match them with what&#8217;s available, or create something new that works.&nbsp; What&#8217;s happening now is the reverse: we choose the standard NFP and then strive or force our artistic intentions through it.<\/p>\n<p>Although we&#8217;re working now in an environment that is changing at an unprecedented rate, change is elemental to renewal in our craft.&nbsp; Today&#8217;s front-and-center change elements of technological innovation, manifest shifts in demography, and peripatetic audience participation for live events, present challenges that should refresh and energize arts organizations.&nbsp; However, in large organizations, these challenges are perceived mostly as threats, or at the very least, irrelevant to their core operations.&nbsp; Why?&nbsp; The answers are numerous and complex.<\/p>\n<p>One, larger means larger boards and larger administrative staffs to service them.&nbsp; Finding board members who are passionate about an art form, while at the same time understanding the role of boards is extremely difficult.&nbsp; But with the demands of fund raising and high end networking, boards are expanded regardless of these qualities.&nbsp; The result is a governance structure that easily becomes unwieldy and incapable of properly considering any proposal, let alone a dramatic change-oriented one.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Two, larger has often been the result of negative indicators.&nbsp; The size of the administrative staffs in the largest orchestras in American in 1970 was at least one-fifth of the size now.&nbsp; The reasons range from increased competition for audiences and philanthropy to an eroding audience base because of product inflexibility.&nbsp; And the roll up of all of these factors: larger almost always equates with declining earned revenue v. contributed revenue.<\/p>\n<p>Three, because of size, keeping an eye to the mission becomes increasingly difficult, as managing on a day-to-day basis becomes the status quo.&nbsp; When I was with the Philadelphia Orchestra, we used to brag in a macabre fashion that we needed to raise $80,000 every day.&nbsp; With that kind of challenge in one&#8217;s face every day, insuring that an organization&#8217;s mission is achieving success is not front and center.<\/p>\n<p>These large organizations that meet these criteria will fail unless they undertake significant steps to restructure themselves.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have appreciated the many comments that my first blog engendered.&nbsp; My initial outline for future postings included &#8220;ranting&#8221; a bit about the systemic issues that make the standard NFP model dysfunctional, and then post some new and emerging models I&#8217;ve discovered.&nbsp; These models range from those currently in action to those still in construction.&nbsp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-339","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=339"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/339\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=339"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=339"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/state\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}