{"id":625,"date":"2006-06-02T12:01:56","date_gmt":"2006-06-02T16:01:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp\/2006\/06\/brain_or_brawn_month_you_were\/"},"modified":"2006-06-02T12:01:56","modified_gmt":"2006-06-02T16:01:56","slug":"brain_or_brawn_month_you_were","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/2006\/06\/brain_or_brawn_month_you_were\/","title":{"rendered":"BRAIN OR BRAWN, MONTH YOU WERE BORN&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>III.<BR><BR><br \/>\nI agree&#8211;&#8220;gender&#8221; has become a buzzword, especially in academia, and in gay circles. So, were you trying to address the idea that men have no role models and how men relate to feminism? Because I don&#8217;t recall reading anything like that. In fact, I was startled how little feminism came up when discussing men. It did more so in that last chapter&#8230;maybe I just don&#8217;t remember it, or maybe it&#8217;s because &#8220;feminism&#8221; wasn&#8217;t so mainstream before the mid-70s. I can understand skipping the gay stuff, but then feminism must be repeated for every person discussed. The pages and pages of Springsteen stuff was a mini-bio of him and his relationship with his father through song. I saw nothing applicable to the subject of &#8220;how rock and roll changed gender in America.&#8221; And if Springsteen is the only modern living feminist male rocker you could think of to write about, that&#8217;s really sad. Same with all the pages on Townsend and the Who&#8211;there was barely a hint of anything to do with gender or feminism. It just wasn&#8217;t clear enough.<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nI think you also missed on a great opportunity with Sleater-Kinney. I know you mentioned them in passing, but I think they are just as important as PJ Harvey (who should have had several pages devoted to her) if you&#8217;re discussing modern female rockers. I&#8217;ve seen them several times, and I don&#8217;t even like their music that much. Their show is amazing, and it&#8217;s because they are using bands like the Who as a template. Carrie Brownstein rocks the fuck out like she&#8217;s Townsend, and has said pretty much that he&#8217;s her role model. When &#8220;In the Woods&#8221; came out, Carrie admitted that she&#8217;s always been a huge classic rock fan, and saw no issue with that and her feminism. Some of those interviews may be worth searching for. I know one was in Seattle&#8217;s free paper.<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nI think that using Elvis&#8217;s songs as a way to judge what he thought of women is ridiculous. Did he even pick his own songs? He sang them because he was paid to sing them&#8230;maybe he liked them, maybe he believed in them, who knows? He didn&#8217;t write them, so there is no proof they are from his heart. The songs can mean just as much to an Elvis impersonator. It&#8217;s just as impersonal.<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nSo really your book isn&#8217;t about gender, it&#8217;s about the treatment of women in rock n&#8217; roll? Feminism in rock? That seems to jive with the content better than &#8220;gender,&#8221; which is so general.<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nI don&#8217;t mean to say that I didn&#8217;t like it or don&#8217;t appreciate it as a gift. \ud83d\ude42 I certainly learned a lot from it. I just didn&#8217;t learn what I thought I&#8217;d learn&#8230;<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\n&#8211;SM of <a href=\"heresyourwater.com\/blog\" target=\"_blank\">heresyourwater.com\/blog<\/A><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>III. I agree&#8211;&#8220;gender&#8221; has become a buzzword, especially in academia, and in gay circles. So, were you trying to address the idea that men have no role models and how men relate to feminism? Because I don&#8217;t recall reading anything like that. In fact, I was startled how little feminism came up when discussing men. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-625","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/625\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}