{"id":564,"date":"2005-08-27T05:44:15","date_gmt":"2005-08-27T09:44:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp\/2005\/08\/ave_atque_vale\/"},"modified":"2005-08-27T05:44:15","modified_gmt":"2005-08-27T09:44:15","slug":"ave_atque_vale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/2005\/08\/ave_atque_vale\/","title":{"rendered":"AVE ATQUE VALE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NOTES ON SFU FINALE <BR><BR><br \/>\nAnalogous to SEINFELD&#8217;s closer, where creator Larry David reached for sentimental self-hatred and found barely pity. (CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM often pulls this off.) Alan Ball&#8217;s feast of death became a weeper, true sign of a writer who&#8217;s fallen too much in love with his characters and needs to churn out a few more drafts. The most obvious sign was the opening preemie childbirth of Rachel and Nate&#8217;s daughter, dangled as the opening corpse with that ominous hyphen AS THOUGH THEY MIGHT ACTUALLY KILL HER OFF BY THE END OF THE SHOW. Within ten minutes this became preposterous. Killing a preemie might have fulfilled Rachel&#8217;s worst fears and self-loathing, but this was a finale tailored to the M*A*S*H* crowd: if the opening stiff was a cheat, the closing visitation by Nate and his father Nathaniel was out and out clumsy. Rachel had never met Nate&#8217;s father, she would never have been visited by HIS ghost. All the ghosts in this episode tormented their subjects until they turned into hollow Freudian hallucinations. David sees his red-hooded stalker until he boldly confronts him in the mortuary&#8217;s basement workroom, the vivid deathspace, only to discover that his tormentor is HIMSELF. This panders to all this show&#8217;s better ideas: David remains genuinely traumatized by a psychopath who poured gasoline on him and made him, one of TV&#8217;s best-written homosexuals (played by a breeder) suck on a gun. Even after confronting the poor sod in prison, he&#8217;s inexplicably haunted&#8230; even the best shrink would work a couple years work on this alone, not to mention David&#8217;s childhood in a funeral parlor. Confronting this ghost as &#8220;himself&#8221; trivializes the whole thing&#8230; which could have been followed up on with Keith, ex-LAPDer who probably knows from PTS.<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nRuth&#8217;s arc was the most  cliche in a pile of doozies: she camps out at her sister&#8217;s, lets her hair down, and opens a dog babysitting service with Kathy Bates. On the Memorial show Ball was quoted as saying &#8220;Ruth is surprising because she&#8217;s always surprising herself&#8230;,&#8221; which is gobbledy-gook for not thinking her character through. So he turns her into  an Earth Mother who suddenly vaults into the voice of compassionate experience for Claire. Oh please.<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nYou could get with the idea of showing how all the major characters die if only Hollywood weren&#8217;t in one of its WORST OLD-AGE makeup phases these days. HUGE clunker having Keith killed by thieves as a security guard, one of the show&#8217;s most noble characters reduced to a racist cliche. <BR><BR><br \/>\n<B>CONNECTION PROBS PLAGUE BLOGGER OVERSEAS<\/B><BR><BR><br \/>\nBlog Friday moves to Glob Saturday, with extras. <BR><BR><br \/>\n<B>HALE AND FAREWELL<\/B><BR><BR><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/query.nytimes.com\/gst\/abstract.html?res=F40F16FC395A0C768DDDA10894DD404482\" target=\"_blank\">Dr. Conrad Milton Riley<\/A> 1913-2005<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NOTES ON SFU FINALE Analogous to SEINFELD&#8217;s closer, where creator Larry David reached for sentimental self-hatred and found barely pity. (CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM often pulls this off.) Alan Ball&#8217;s feast of death became a weeper, true sign of a writer who&#8217;s fallen too much in love with his characters and needs to churn out a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-564","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=564"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}