{"id":477,"date":"2005-03-10T01:55:37","date_gmt":"2005-03-10T06:55:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp\/2005\/03\/trade_bites_industry\/"},"modified":"2005-03-10T01:55:37","modified_gmt":"2005-03-10T06:55:37","slug":"trade_bites_industry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/2005\/03\/trade_bites_industry\/","title":{"rendered":"TRADE BITES INDUSTRY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>from Billboard&#8217;s new blog, <a href=\"http:\/\/billboard.blogs.com\/billboardpostplay\/\" target=\"_blank\">PostPlay<\/A>:<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nThe RIAA&#8217;s False Mathematics<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nHere&#8217;s another great post by Barry Rotholtz on The Big Picture.  He takes a look at the paid subscription models like Rhapsody and Napster-To-Go and shows that the actual P2P losses to the industry are much much smaller than the RIAA trumpets&#8230;If you rationally analyze the &#8216;unlimited downloads for a fixed monthly fee&#8217; business model, you get pretty convincing evidence that the maximum damages are only around $10 a month per person. &#8220;Here&#8217;s a little secret the RIAA would rather not have you know: Musicians make most of their money performing and touring &#8212; not selling CDs or downloads&#8230;.The industry can scapegoat P2P for all their woes, but a closer analysis of the math demonstrates the claim is illusory. (Mis)management is the primary sources of the industry problems.&#8221; (via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.paidcontent.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">PaidContent.org<\/A>)<br \/>\n<BR><BR><br \/>\nAlso, a new favorite: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lostremote.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Lost Remote<\/A>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>from Billboard&#8217;s new blog, PostPlay: The RIAA&#8217;s False Mathematics Here&#8217;s another great post by Barry Rotholtz on The Big Picture. He takes a look at the paid subscription models like Rhapsody and Napster-To-Go and shows that the actual P2P losses to the industry are much much smaller than the RIAA trumpets&#8230;If you rationally analyze the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-477","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=477"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/riley\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}