{"id":6922,"date":"2015-09-04T21:54:04","date_gmt":"2015-09-05T04:54:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/?p=6922"},"modified":"2015-09-05T00:21:20","modified_gmt":"2015-09-05T07:21:20","slug":"other-matters-plain-english","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/2015\/09\/other-matters-plain-english\/","title":{"rendered":"Other Matters: Plain English"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[contextly_auto_sidebar id=&#8221;6w9o1TO3rhKj9GpgVBH5IwAp90KeTldy&#8221;]<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/That-.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/That-.jpg\" alt=\"That\" width=\"200\" height=\"101\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-6923\" \/><\/a>In the English language, the word \u00e2\u20ac\u0153that\u00e2\u20ac\u009d used as a conjunction can illuminate meaning and make for easier comprehension. Yet, today more and more editors and speakers eliminate the word, and clarity suffers. Here are examples from September 4 news accounts, the first from a newspaper business section, the second from a wire service. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>VoloMetrix says its algorithms are designed to avoid scooping up non-work-related data, and in reports it defaults to group-related data on employees, not personally identifiable information&#8212;<em>Seattle Times<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If \u00e2\u20ac\u0153that\u00e2\u20ac\u009d followed \u00e2\u20ac\u0153says\u00e2\u20ac\u009d in the first line and followed \u00e2\u20ac\u0153and\u00e2\u20ac\u009d in the second, the meaning would be clearer. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>He confirmed the family had wanted to go to Canada but now only wants to return to Kobane to bury their dead.&#8212;<em>Agence France-Presse<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The sentence is not technically wrong, but if \u00e2\u20ac\u0153that\u00e2\u20ac\u009d followed \u00e2\u20ac\u0153confirmed\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, the reading would be smoother. As it is, the eye stumbles momentarily.<\/p>\n<p>Here is another example, hypothetical but common:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The senator said today his candidacy was in good shape.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153today\u00e2\u20ac\u009d could refer to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153said\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or to his candidacy. If \u00e2\u20ac\u0153that&#8217; followed \u00e2\u20ac\u0153said\u00e2\u20ac\u009d there would be no doubt. It would also make the sentence a bit less awkward.<\/p>\n<p>That\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s that.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[contextly_auto_sidebar id=&#8221;6w9o1TO3rhKj9GpgVBH5IwAp90KeTldy&#8221;] In the English language, the word \u00e2\u20ac\u0153that\u00e2\u20ac\u009d used as a conjunction can illuminate meaning and make for easier comprehension. Yet, today more and more editors and speakers eliminate the word, and clarity suffers. Here are examples from September 4 news accounts, the first from a newspaper business section, the second from a wire [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-6922","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry","8":"has-post-thumbnail"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6922"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6922\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/rifftides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}