{"id":744,"date":"2009-06-01T18:42:29","date_gmt":"2009-06-01T17:42:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp\/2009\/06\/judgement_day.html"},"modified":"2009-06-01T18:42:29","modified_gmt":"2009-06-01T17:42:29","slug":"judgement_day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/2009\/06\/judgement_day.html","title":{"rendered":"Judgement day"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Blogs are notorious for elevating the minutiae of the blogger&#8217;s life into distended posts. Well, grab a couple of matchsticks for your eyelids, Gladys, because minutiae don&#8217;t come much more minute than this.<br \/>\nThe scene is a checkout queue in my local supermarket. The time is a quiet weekday morning. So quiet, in fact, that few of the lines are open, and the gent in front of me has a full family load of goods ambling towards the till. He asks for help packing his purchases: none is forthcoming. I offer to help: he refuses. I, foolishly, think he&#8217;s merely being polite (pointless self-denial is the British way), so I offer again. He declines again, rather more forcefully. &#8216;It wasn&#8217;t an aggressive offer of help, you know,&#8217; I say, taken aback. &#8216;Look, I&#8217;ve  said no three times now,&#8217; he snaps. &#8216;Just leave it.&#8217;<br \/>\nWell, I warned you it was minutiae. But there is a point, honest: as I stood there, baffled, oddly chastened and waiting for him to deal with pastas and salads and fancy biscuits, I reflected on how audiences read acting. We go to the theatre and we confidently assign meanings to human behaviour. Sometimes those meanings are diagnostic (he&#8217;s angry; she&#8217;s grieving), sometimes they involve a moral judgement (naughty man; nice lady). But although my neighbour and I might disagree about these readings, there is usually a good steer from the performer or production to help us assess the character.<br \/>\nWithout context, I realised, we flounder. I had no idea why the man in the queue responded so sharply. Was he painfully shy or furiously self-sufficient? Did he feel that his alpha-masculinity, already severely compromised by shuffling celery on a Thursday morning, was placed under even greater threat when another guy offered assistance? Would he have responded differently to a female shopper? Was he planning to poison his wife with a toxic tagine, and fear that he&#8217;d been rumbled? How could I begin to guess?<br \/>\nOr, even more troubling, was I failing to read my <em>own<\/em> behaviour correctly? Maybe I didn&#8217;t seem friendly at all, but pushy, or even creepy. Was this a scene about an angry boor spurning a good samaritan, or about a reserved man fending off a meddling loon? Without some establishing scenes involving friends, family, authority figures or a Greek chorus hanging around the frozen goods, it was impossible to know how to read the encounter.<br \/>\nSo far, so Thursday. But critics tend to describe characters and performances with just a phrase or a single epithet: recently, I find, I&#8217;ve gone for harried, gorgon, &#8216;a shambles of dubious potential&#8217;, &#8216;droll-dimpled&#8217; [&#8216;were his dimples really droll?&#8217; asked my editor. Yes, indeedy], &#8216;unglamorous voluptuary&#8217; and, I&#8217;m afraid to confess, &#8216;a cock with a quiff.&#8217; The last was cut, but on grounds of taste rather than its unimpeachable accuracy. All seemed spot-on to me &#8211; but how would I sum up the man in the queue? How would I describe myself? How much confidence do we have in our character readings?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Blogs are notorious for elevating the minutiae of the blogger&#8217;s life into distended posts. Well, grab a couple of matchsticks for your eyelids, Gladys, because minutiae don&#8217;t come much more minute than this. The scene is a checkout queue in my local supermarket. The time is a quiet weekday morning. So quiet, in fact, that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-744","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=744"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/744\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/performancemonkey\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}