{"id":68,"date":"2009-09-13T17:26:22","date_gmt":"2009-09-13T17:26:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp\/?p=68"},"modified":"2009-09-13T17:26:22","modified_gmt":"2009-09-13T17:26:22","slug":"my_fall_puzzle_art_food_fangs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/2009\/09\/my_fall_puzzle_art_food_fangs.html","title":{"rendered":"Has &#8216;Project Runway&#8217; Jumped the Sharkskin?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1.25em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 0.8em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1.56em\"><strong>And Other Crucial Parts of the Culture Puzzle<\/strong><\/font><\/font><\/font><\/font><\/p>\n<p><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1.25em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 0.8em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1em\"><strong><\/strong><\/font><\/font><\/font><\/font><\/p>\n<p><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1.25em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 0.8em\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1em\"><strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/Project%20Runway%2C%20Lifetime.jpg\"><font style=\"FONT-SIZE: 1.56em\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"MARGIN: 0px 0px 20px 20px; FLOAT: right\" class=\"mt-image-right\" alt=\"Project Runway, Lifetime\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/assets_c\/2009\/09\/Project%20Runway,%20Lifetime-thumb-300x447-9985.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"447\" \/><\/font><\/a>I&#8217;ve never been a fan <\/strong>of purely reactive writing. Most of it banishes those errant ideas and&nbsp;images that have no obvious connection to the fake trend or genuine outrage of the moment, but are nonetheless a writer&#8217;s best reason to write<\/font>.<\/font><\/font><\/font><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a puzzle, then, to find novel ways to react &#8220;new&#8221; to the daily cultural-political flood. Maybe the task can be accomplished in pieces. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Jigsaw Part 1: Bloodsuckers<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m afraid that our favorite TV &#8220;crossover&#8221; shows are withering. You know, crossovers, the programs that appeal to all shapes and sizes, the ones that full professors pretend to feel guilty about watching. Every season has &#8217;em, but in television as in life, nothing good remains firm. Everything droops.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s not even a Dorian Gray attic to imagine on the inevitably jowly&nbsp;<em>Desperate Housewives <\/em>premiere<em>. <\/em>Ellen on <em>Idol<\/em>? <em>So You <\/em>Still <em>Think You Can Dance?<\/em> As one of my outraged Facebook friends said when I moaned about the early dismissal of <em>Project Runway&#8217;s<\/em> two most creative contestants, &#8220;Please, they&#8217;re being asked to choose from Macy&#8217;s Wall of Accessories.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So what&#8217;s wrong with Macy&#8217;s? My late mother sold makeup in the Herald Square store, once to Joan Crawford &#8212; shades of <em>The Women<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a plug. The whole show has been a multipronged plug, but now that all the compensatory elements of surprise and conflict and joy of looking have evaporated, there&#8217;s no hiding it. Didn&#8217;t someone know that you can&#8217;t move a sewing circus out of New York, New York and expect it to retain even faux credibility? Plus, that pathetic model &#8220;competition&#8221; appended to the main hour is like&nbsp;throwing a sweater set onto the runway after&nbsp;the wedding-dress finale. So I have moved to that favorite-show middle ground where I won&#8217;t lose sleep if I miss an episode &#8212; which every studio knows is the beginning of the end.<\/p>\n<p>Yes,<em>&nbsp;Project Runway<\/em> has jumped the sharkskin. <\/p>\n<p>\n<span style=\"DISPLAY: inline\" class=\"mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/True%20Blood%2C%20God%20Hates%20Fangs.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"MARGIN: 0px 0px 20px 20px; FLOAT: right\" class=\"mt-image-right\" alt=\"True Blood, God Hates Fangs\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/assets_c\/2009\/09\/True%20Blood,%20God%20Hates%20Fangs-thumb-300x425-9987.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"425\" \/><\/a><\/span>Faithful readers may be able to guess which crossover shows I look forward to on Sunday nights. Yes, they&#8217;re both about bloodsuckers. <em>True Blood <\/em>is first-class progressive trash, and you needn&#8217;t even remember its axiomatic trope that Fangs = Fags to find the bloody soap simultaneously comforting and refreshing.&nbsp;I&#8217;m about to grill a&nbsp;New York steak, bleu, to prepare for the season finale. Maybe I&#8217;ll shed a red tear&nbsp;afterward.<\/p>\n<p>To introduce <em>Mad Men&#8217;s <\/em>third season, the promotion machinery fastened on its period wall-ovens and&nbsp;stovetops, ignoring utterly the show&#8217;s &#8212; paradoxically faulty &#8212; critique of advertising&#8217;s hold on culture. Why faulty? The luscious vintage sets and outfits ignite the very hunger for product that the storylines half-heartedly propose is merely a symptom of mass manipulation.<\/p>\n<p>\n<p>How else would I have noticed that the white Eva Zeisel dinnerware used in some Midcentury Manse looked not like the designer&#8217;s vintage Tomorrow&#8217;s Classic (genuine article below), but instead were newly bought examples of the&nbsp;smart hybrid&nbsp;sold by&nbsp;Crate &amp; Barrel?<\/p>\n<p>\n<span style=\"DISPLAY: inline\" class=\"mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px; FLOAT: left\" class=\"mt-image-left\" alt=\"Eva Zeisel Tomorrow's Classic dinnerware\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/assets_c\/2009\/09\/Eva%20Zeisel%20Tomorrow's%20Classic%20dinnerware-thumb-150x112-9989.jpg\" width=\"150\" height=\"112\" \/><\/span><\/p>\n<p>I ate that steak, by the way,&nbsp;on sleek plates designed in the early &#8217;50s by Glidden Parker. The same dishes were used&nbsp;by Lucy and&nbsp;Rickey during their first year as America&#8217;s escape valve &#8212; probably not my own particular plates, but you never can really know where aged objects have been.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Next Piece of the Puzzle: Why Bill Viola Is Mah Hero<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>For an automatic alert when there is a new Out There post, email <st1:personname w:st=\"on\"><a href=\"mailto:jiweinste@aol.com\"><font color=\"#ab0404\">jiweinste@aol.com<\/font><\/a><\/st1:personname>.<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>. <\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And Other Crucial Parts of the Culture Puzzle I&#8217;ve never been a fan of purely reactive writing. Most of it banishes those errant ideas and&nbsp;images that have no obvious connection to the fake trend or genuine outrage of the moment, but are nonetheless a writer&#8217;s best reason to write. It&#8217;s a puzzle, then, to find [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[72,85,124,16,20,125,14,123],"class_list":{"0":"post-68","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"tag-advertising","8":"tag-american-idol","9":"tag-fashion","10":"tag-gay","11":"tag-project-runway","12":"tag-true-blood","13":"tag-tv","14":"tag-vampire","15":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/outthere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}