{"id":423,"date":"2010-02-18T14:24:14","date_gmt":"2010-02-18T14:24:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp\/?p=423"},"modified":"2010-02-18T14:24:14","modified_gmt":"2010-02-18T14:24:14","slug":"everything_good_needs_replacin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/2010\/02\/everything_good_needs_replacin\/","title":{"rendered":"Everything good needs replacing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I went to see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.parsonsdance.org\/home.php\">Parsons Dance<\/a> at The Joyce last night with co-AJ blogger <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/realcleararts\/\">Judith Dobrzynski<\/a>, and was immediately brought back to a simpler time when the last Parsons piece, <i>In The End<\/i>, opened with Dave Matthews Band&#8217;s <i>Satellite. <\/p>\n<p><\/i>You know a band&#8217;s popular when even I&#8211;no older siblings, ballet, harp, matching colored socks to turtlenecks, <i>Star Trek<\/i>, <i>Boy Meets World<\/i>, the &#8220;Disney Afternoon&#8221;, Narnia&#8211;had a copy of <i>Under The Table and Dreaming. <\/p>\n<p><\/i><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"UnderTheTableAndDreaming.jpg\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/UnderTheTableAndDreaming.jpg\" class=\"mt-image-center\" style=\"margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;\" height=\"299\" width=\"300\" \/>A quick gander at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.davematthewsband.com\/\">actually not un-cool Dave Matthews Band website<\/a> and the full-page ad for a Citi Field concert in this week&#8217;s <i>Time Out NY <\/i>would seem to prove that &#8220;DMB&#8221; is still touring quite successfully. But do you <i>remember<\/i> how famous they were? Throughout the Parsons piece, I thought about all the bands and songs I was &#8220;obsessed&#8221; with ten, fifteen, years ago.&nbsp; To name a few of the most embarrassing: EV\u018e 6 (&#8220;<font><font class=\"txt_1\">I burn burn like a wicker cabinet&#8221;)<\/font><\/font>, Guster (&#8220;She comes from far away, and gets closer everyday&#8221;), Splender (&#8220;The world seems bigger than both of us, yet it seems so small when I begin to cry&#8221;), and Fastball (&#8220;If you&#8217;re sad then it&#8217;s time you spoke up, too&#8221;).&nbsp; I refuse to include the Gin Blossoms (&#8220;&#8217;cause all I really want&#8217;s to be with you and feel like I matter, too&#8221;)&nbsp; in this list, because I Stand By that obsession. <\/p>\n<p>Sure, plenty of artists who were unbelievably successful in the 90s still are today&#8211;Madonna, Radiohead (against any kind of odds or trends), U2, Pearl Jam (after a break, which is an important point, but perhaps for another blog post), The Beastie Boys (I guess?), Green Day (again, after a break), Weezer, etc.&#8211;but what of Hanson, Spin Doctors, Hootie &amp; the Blowfish, Barenaked Ladies, Meredith Brooks&#8230;I mean, Marcy Playground?<i> Chumbawamba??<\/i> And these are the, for lack of a better word, over-ground bands; we haven&#8217;t even gotten into what will become of &#8220;underground&#8221;&#8211;that is, &#8220;not on Z100&#8221;&#8211;bands like Yeasayer, Frightened Rabbit, and The Dirty Projectors, in ten years. About four people made fun of me for going to a Clientele concert last summer. They were JUST TRENDY! How are they already been doomed to indie rock Splender-dom?<\/p>\n<p>This is perhaps, an apples and oranges situation, but let&#8217;s see how we do:<\/p>\n<p>It seems to me that while you have less chance of a meteoric rise to fame as a classical musician, there is more opportunity for a 40-plus year career than there is in rock and popular music.&nbsp; We can all probably name the, what, 20 (?) rock and pop artists with 40-year careers, while hundreds of classical musicians have achieved this. Sure, less people may have bought a classical musician&#8217;s albums or heard him or her perform live in any given one-month or one-year span, but after decade upon decade of performing all over the world, even to perhaps not-capacity crowds, classical musicians reach a lot of people. They also reach a lot people over multiple generations, whereas if someone under 20 can sing through <i>Heart in a Blender <\/i>with me right now, I&#8217;ll eat my hat. (Wait &#8211; do I even have any under-20 readers?) <\/p>\n<p>But if every musician of any genre was given a genie in a bottle (Christina Aguilera, 1999, 5 weeks at #1 on the Billboard Hot 100), which would they choose? 40 years of consistent fame to a small percentage of the population, or a handful of years of fame to billions and then obscurity? What Would Joshua Bell Do? What Would Chumbawamba Do? And if we think that every musician would choose the long-term fame option, then why are so many so eager to do all the press and get all the exposure they can right in this moment, without so much as a glance toward longevity? <\/p>\n<p>You discuss, because I have to go download &#8220;Sex and Candy&#8221; now. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I went to see Parsons Dance at The Joyce last night with co-AJ blogger Judith Dobrzynski, and was immediately brought back to a simpler time when the last Parsons piece, In The End, opened with Dave Matthews Band&#8217;s Satellite. You know a band&#8217;s popular when even I&#8211;no older siblings, ballet, harp, matching colored socks to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-423","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=423"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/423\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}