{"id":416,"date":"2010-02-09T18:19:55","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T18:19:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp\/?p=416"},"modified":"2010-02-09T18:19:55","modified_gmt":"2010-02-09T18:19:55","slug":"no_time_for_losers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/2010\/02\/no_time_for_losers\/","title":{"rendered":"No time for losers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I got into an actual fight with someone about a year ago on the subject of whether or not baseball was a niche. My pro-niche argument was that every industry could be defined as niche to some extent. Yes, some niches are bigger than others, but there are many people in the world who have never heard of baseball, there are even more people in the world who could not name one baseball team, even more than that who could not name one current player, and certainly more than that who could not recite any one team&#8217;s starting line-up. Unsurprisingly, I was trying to make the point that baseball, like classical music, could certainly expand its fan-base through educational outreach, creative marketing and smart PR. <\/p>\n<p>Music, football, winter sports: it&#8217;s an important couple of weeks for special events in a lot of niche-to-some-extent industries. The Grammys last Sunday (congrats to David Lang and Harmonia Mundi for their <a href=\"http:\/\/itunes.apple.com\/us\/album\/lang-little-match-girl-passion\/id315033914\"><i>the little match girl passion<\/i><\/a> win), the Super Bowl on Sunday (My Google Story today: <i>how to get rid of heartburn, Fantastic Mr. Fox DVD release, gay judge Prop 8, Google Super Bowl Ad<\/i> &#8211; none of which have led to crib-building&#8230;yet), and my Personal Favorite Niche-to-some-extent Special Event of All Time, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vancouver2010.com\/\">Winter Olympics<\/a>, which start on Friday. Once a year, or every two years, in the case of the Olympics, people outside of a genre&#8217;s niche turn to it and pay attention for an afternoon, an evening, a week, or a couple weeks. In all the cases I can think of&#8211;the Final Four, the World Series, the Kentucky Derby, the Grammys, The Academy Awards, so on, so forth&#8211;that thing people turn to is a competition framed by some kind of spectacle. <\/p>\n<p>Classical music doesn&#8217;t have one singular event on which the world-at-large can focus. Before you crack your knuckles and start filling out the Comment field, The Grammys don&#8217;t count, because the classical portion isn&#8217;t even televised and we all barely care, let alone any version of the aforementioned world-at-large. Come to think of it, dance doesn&#8217;t have a special event either (though the popularity of TV shows like <i>So You Think You Can Dance<\/i> et al. is something, and again, those shows are competitions with spectacle). New York theater has The Tonys, though it&#8217;s glaringly obvious to anyone paying attention that &#8220;Broadway&#8221; does not equal &#8220;all New York theater.&#8221;&nbsp; I was actually surprised to see a competition <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/02\/09\/arts\/music\/09june.html?src=twt&amp;twt=nytimesmusic\">covered in <i>The New York Times <\/i>yesterday<\/a> (the George London Foundation awards, by Vivien Schweitzer). But even with that kind of mainstream coverage, who can tell what competitions like that mean for singers, or for the opera industry at large? Vivien opens her review with, <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Various music competitions and programs offer promising young singers a<br \/>\nmeans to be heard above the fray. One important contest is the George<br \/>\nLondon Foundation awards competition, named for the renowned American<br \/>\nbass-baritone, which recognized singers like Joyce DiDonato and <a href=\"http:\/\/topics.nytimes.com\/top\/reference\/timestopics\/people\/f\/renee_fleming\/index.html?inline=nyt-per\" title=\"More articles about Renee Fleming.\">Ren\u00e9e Fleming<\/a> early in their careers.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230;but even I, who work in the industry, still don&#8217;t know how these competitions really help careers, or who&#8217;s really paying attention in the industry or outside it. This has nothing to do with the review, but with how we construct, produce and promote classical competitions. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s funny, isn&#8217;t it, that classical musicians are so often compared to athletes in their discipline, their Whomever-given talent and physical attributes, and their commitment to a singular pursuit, often from young ages. But somehow classical music skipped the one thing that brings public interest to all those other things: the competition. Are musicians just not competitive? We know they are. Are we in administration positions&#8211;those who would organize such an event&#8211;just not competitive? Possibly. Many people working in arts administration are, after all, failed (i.e. not competitive enough?) musicians. But clearly our industry is filled with competition: prodigies snatching up Julliard spots, orchestra musicians moving up and down seats, judges determining various degrees of&#8230;&#8221;skill&#8221; and &#8220;artistry&#8221;(?), soloists vying for various orchestral tours and prestigious dates, managers poaching musicians from other agencies, presenters demanding exclusivity&#8230;the list goes on and on.&nbsp; Somehow, though, this competition is neither public nor positive enough to attract more mainstream attention. Does anyone really know the difference between a first and second chair violinist in an orchestra? I certainly don&#8217;t, and this is my job. Would an orchestra ever make that internal competition public through local press or webisodes? Absolutely not, but why not? <\/p>\n<p>I watched the Super Bowl at home in Connecticut this weekend with my dad, sister, aunt and grandmother. At one point during the game, my aunt, who lives in Columbus, Ohio, asked if I ever went to Ohio to see my artists. &#8220;Not really,&#8221; I said. &#8220;Is that because Ohio doesn&#8217;t have good enough arts?&#8221; she asked. &#8220;Not at all, actually: The Cleveland Orchestra is probably the best orchestra in the country.&#8221; Her face lit up, &#8220;<i>Really? <\/i>The best in the <i>country? <\/i>I&#8217;ll have to go see them!&#8221; She&#8217;s lived in Ohio my entire life and never had any desire to see the Cleveland Orchestra before learning that they might be The Best. She didn&#8217;t even ask what &#8220;the best&#8221; meant in this case! The superlative itself was good enough reason to drive two hours to see them. Similarly, friends are constantly asking me if Hilary is &#8220;the best violinist in the world,&#8221; and I always brush it off with something ridiculous like, &#8220;Well, she&#8217;s very good&#8230;&#8221; But that&#8217;s what the Olympics etc. tell us (insert joke about The<i> World<\/i> Series being an exclusively North American event __here__), and that&#8217;s what we want to know. Who can run the fastest? Who can jump the farthest? It&#8217;s quite silly, actually, but it&#8217;s what we crave. <\/p>\n<p>Is there&#8217;s some way to garner the same excitement that sports have in<br \/>\nwhat is essentially a wholesome battle of skill without losing the<br \/>\ninherent nuance of the performing arts?&nbsp; If so, what would it look like? Is there a mainstream awareness benefit to being able to say every year that this is the Best Orchestra in the World, the Best Violinist in the World, the Best Pianist in the World, (the Best Classical Music Publicist in the World?&#8230;just kidding), or would that be considered (yet) another attempt to market for the sake of marketing, with no true value attached?<br \/><font face=\"Book Antiqua\"><span style=\"font-size: 12px;\"><\/span><\/font><br \/>\n<!--EndFragment--><font face=\"Book Antiqua\"><span style=\"font-size: 12px;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/font><br \/>\n<!--EndFragment--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I got into an actual fight with someone about a year ago on the subject of whether or not baseball was a niche. My pro-niche argument was that every industry could be defined as niche to some extent. Yes, some niches are bigger than others, but there are many people in the world who have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-416","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/416\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/lifesapitch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}