{"id":980,"date":"2005-01-07T11:25:23","date_gmt":"2005-01-07T19:25:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2005\/01\/tortured_testimony\/"},"modified":"2005-01-07T11:25:23","modified_gmt":"2005-01-07T19:25:23","slug":"tortured_testimony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2005\/01\/tortured_testimony.html","title":{"rendered":"TORTURED TESTIMONY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>The front-page headline says: <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/01\/07\/politics\/07gonzales.html?hp&#038;ex=1105160400&#038;en=a9\n3888e1207bb52c&#038;ei=5094&#038;partner=homepage\" target='new\"'><B><FONT\ncolor=#003399>&#8220;Gonzales Speaks Against Torture During Hearing.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> Well,<br \/>\nas Rummy Boy might say, <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20041201.shtml#93578\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>golly gee willikers<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>. How noble<br \/>\nof Mr. Gonzales. Give that man a medal. Better yet, make that man attorney general. After all, he<br \/>\nsays he understands the difference between being White House counsel, his current job, and being<br \/>\nthe nation&#8217;s top law enforcer. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>If he&#8217;s confirmed, he says he&#8217;ll represent all the people instead of just the president. Well, golly<br \/>\ngee again. Does that also sorta mean by implication that he sorta believed in torture when he<br \/>\nrepped the Maximum Leader and drafted a memorandum calling the Geneva Conventions<br \/>\nirrelevant? And that Georgie Boy sorta believed in torture, too?<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Others besides Straight Up&#8217;s staff of thousands have not been taken in by Gonzales&#8217;s <A\nclass=inline href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20050101.shtml#94099\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>softspeak<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>. Bob Herbert also<br \/>\ncasts a cold eye this morning. &#8220;The Bush administration and Mr. Gonzales are trying to sell the<br \/>\nfiction that they&#8217;ve seen the light,&#8221; he writes in <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/01\/07\/opinion\/07herbert.html\" target='new\"'><B><FONT\ncolor=#003399>&#8220;Promoting Torture&#8217;s Promoter.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> Herbert points to a recent<br \/>\nstory in The Washington Post that the Bush regime is even now making plans to negate the due<br \/>\nprocess of law by possibly imprisoning suspected terrorists for life without ever bringing charges<br \/>\nagainst them in court. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Citing last month&#8217;s ruling by Britain&#8217;s highest court that, as one of the justices wrote, such<br \/>\ndetentions &#8220;call into question the very existence of an ancient liberty of which this country has<br \/>\nuntil now been very proud: freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention,&#8221; Herbert concludes:<br \/>\n&#8220;That&#8217;s a sentiment completely lost on Alberto Gonzales or George W. Bush.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>And as the <A class=inline href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/01\/07\/opinion\/07fri1.html\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>lead editorial<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> in this morning&#8217;s<br \/>\nNew York Times so nicely put it, speaking of Gonzales and his sense of responsibility:<\/P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>Even vows of allegiance to the rule of law were rather peculiar. He said that<br \/>\nas White House counsel, he had represented &#8220;only the White House,&#8221; while as attorney general,<br \/>\nhe &#8220;would have a far broader responsibility: to pursue justice for all the people of our great<br \/>\nnation, to see that the laws are enforced in a fair and impartial manner for all Americans.&#8221; We<br \/>\nthought that was also the obligation of the president and his staff.<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><B>Postscript:<\/B> The Washington Post&#8217;s <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A54607-2005Jan6.html\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>news story<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> this morning is worth<br \/>\nreading for these paragraphs: <\/P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>Gonzales declined to answer many questions and said he could not recall<br \/>\ndetails in relation to many others, prompting complaints from some Democrats on the committee.<br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>&#8220;We&#8217;re looking for you, when we ask you questions, to give us an answer, which you haven&#8217;t<br \/>\ndone yet,&#8221; Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) told Gonzales. &#8220;I love you, but you&#8217;re not very<br \/>\ncandid so far.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Four different senators tried to pin down Gonzales on the August 2002 memo&#8217;s controversial<br \/>\nassertion that a president had the power to authorize torture in unusual circumstances, but<br \/>\nGonzales deflected that, saying it was a &#8220;hypothetical question.&#8221; &#8230;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>At the same time, Gonzales did not rule out reaching such a conclusion in the future. &#8220;I would<br \/>\nhave to know what . . . is the national interest that the president may have to consider,&#8221; he told<br \/>\nSen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.).<\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>The Los Angeles Times <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/la-na-gonzales7jan07,0,1086880.story?c\noll=la-home-headlines\" target='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>news<br \/>\nstory<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> was also worth a read for these grafs:<\/P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>&#8220;What was lacking in this hearing was a fuller measure of accountability,<br \/>\nsomething that has long been lacking from this administration,&#8221; said Vermont Sen. Patrick J.<br \/>\nLeahy, senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. &#8220;The Bush administration&#8217;s torture policy<br \/>\nseems to have been created through spontaneous combustion. No one will take responsibility for<br \/>\nit.&#8221;<br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Pressed by several Democrats about whether he personally agreed with the conclusions of the<br \/>\nmemo, Gonzales demurred, noting that a new opinion on the subject from the Justice Department<br \/>\nissued last week rejected the most controversial aspects of the earlier document &#8212; albeit more<br \/>\nthan two years after it was issued.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>The original memo &#8220;does not represent the views of the executive branch. It has been<br \/>\nreplaced by a new opinion . . . and so as far as I am concerned it is not an issue,&#8221; Gonzales<br \/>\nsaid.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Democrats said he had a legal and moral duty to speak up sooner. &#8220;You never repudiated it.<br \/>\nThat&#8217;s the record. You never repudiated it,&#8221; said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts,<br \/>\nadding that the failure to do so made &#8220;hollow&#8221; the president&#8217;s directive that soldiers act<br \/>\nhumanely.<\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Hollow indeed. The professed right to authorize torture no longer counts because &#8220;it has been<br \/>\nreplaced by a new opinion.&#8221; The regime&#8217;s m.o., as represented by Gonzales, is a triumph of<br \/>\nsomething worse than sophistry &#8212; unmitigated gall.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The front-page headline says: &#8220;Gonzales Speaks Against Torture During Hearing.&#8221; Well, as Rummy Boy might say, golly gee willikers. How noble of Mr. Gonzales. Give that man a medal. Better yet, make that man attorney general. After all, he says he understands the difference between being White House counsel, his current job, and being the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-980","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-fO","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/980","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=980"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/980\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=980"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=980"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=980"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}