{"id":978,"date":"2005-01-06T12:40:39","date_gmt":"2005-01-06T20:40:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2005\/01\/the_pure_malarkey_of_softspeak\/"},"modified":"2005-01-06T12:40:39","modified_gmt":"2005-01-06T20:40:39","slug":"the_pure_malarkey_of_softspeak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2005\/01\/the_pure_malarkey_of_softspeak.html","title":{"rendered":"THE PURE MALARKEY OF <I>SOFTSPEAK<\/i>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Alberto Gonzales has added <I>softspeak<\/I>, a modification of <I>newspeak<\/I>, to the<br \/>\nOrwellian lexicon, although Sen. Joe Biden had another term for it: &#8220;Pure malarkey!&#8221; That&#8217;s how<br \/>\nBiden, fed up with Gonzales&#8217;s lack of candor, characterized the Attorney General nominee&#8217;s<br \/>\ntestimony in this morning&#8217;s <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20050101.shtml#94085\"\ntarget='new\"<b'><FONT color=#003399><STRONG>Senate<br \/>\nhearing<\/B><\/STRONG><\/FONT><\/A>. (A big tip of the hat, too, to Sen. Ted Kennedy for not<br \/>\npussyfooting around.)<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Here&#8217;s how <I>softspeak<\/I> works: Asked by Sen. Pat Leahy whether he believes in holding<br \/>\npolicy makers accountable for their decisions &#8212; in this case military and civilian leaders who<br \/>\ncondoned torture &#8212; Gonzales replied: &#8220;If there&#8217;s an allegation that we&#8217;ve done something wrong,<br \/>\nwe investigate it.&#8221; He then listed a handful of investigations into the torture at Abu Ghraib,<br \/>\nGuantanamo and other military detention camps. What Gonzales failed to say was that, of the<br \/>\n&#8220;requisite half-dozen investigations, none [were] empowered to touch those who devised the<br \/>\npolicies,&#8221; as Mark Danner writes this morning in <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/01\/06\/opinion\/06danner.html?oref=login&#038;hp\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;We Are All Torturers.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/B><\/A><br \/>\n<P><EM>Newspeak<\/EM>, you may recall, is the official language of Oceania and is commonly<br \/>\ndefined as ambiguous and contradictory language that deliberately misleads and manipulates the<br \/>\npublic. Thus <I>softspeak<\/I> may be defined as direct and unambiguous language that<br \/>\nnonetheless deliberately misleads and manipulates the public to draw a false conclusion &#8212; in this<br \/>\ncase, that he and the Bush regime believe in<br \/>\naccountability.<\/P><STRONG>Postscript:<\/STRONG> Now that I&#8217;ve checked the <A\nclass=inline href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2005\/ALLPOLITICS\/01\/06\/gonzales.hearing\/index.html\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>CNN account<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> of the hearing and<br \/>\n<A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/01\/06\/politics\/07gonzalezcnd.html?hp&#038;ex=1105074000&#038;en\n=e1ca8de5de25c484&#038;ei=5094&#038;partner=homepage\" target='new\"'><B><FONT\ncolor=#003399>The New York Times account<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> (as of  2:15 pm ET), I see<br \/>\nthat both ignore Biden&#8217;s great piece of <I>plainspeak<\/I>, which just happened to be the most<br \/>\ngalvanizing moment of the morning session. Both reports read like <EM>softspeak<\/EM> press<br \/>\nreleases.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Alberto Gonzales has added softspeak, a modification of newspeak, to the Orwellian lexicon, although Sen. Joe Biden had another term for it: &#8220;Pure malarkey!&#8221; That&#8217;s how Biden, fed up with Gonzales&#8217;s lack of candor, characterized the Attorney General nominee&#8217;s testimony in this morning&#8217;s Senate hearing. (A big tip of the hat, too, to Sen. Ted [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-978","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-fM","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=978"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/978\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}