{"id":875,"date":"2004-10-08T08:50:55","date_gmt":"2004-10-08T15:50:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/10\/something_fishy\/"},"modified":"2004-10-08T08:50:55","modified_gmt":"2004-10-08T15:50:55","slug":"something_fishy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/10\/something_fishy.html","title":{"rendered":"SOMETHING FISHY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>I&#8217;m beginning to feel like <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.fortunecity.com\/tinpan\/newbonham\/6\/johnny.htm\" target='new\"'><B><FONT\ncolor=#003399>Johnny One-Note<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>: Here&#8217;s a revealing footnote to the<br \/>\ndefinitive WMD report by the CIA&#8217;s Iraq Survey Group. It sketches how technical experts who<br \/>\ndoubted that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons were silenced by the Bush gang. Although it<br \/>\nappeared in August 2003 at <A class=inline href=\"http:\/\/www.worldnetdaily.com\/\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>WorldNetDaily<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>, it came to a<br \/>\nStraight Up reader&#8217;s attention only yesterday. &#8220;I understand its substance to be correct,&#8221; he<br \/>\nadds.<\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>WASHINGTON &#8212; A former Energy Department intelligence chief who<br \/>\nagreed with the White House claim that Iraq had reconstituted its defunct nuclear-arms program<br \/>\nwas awarded a total of $20,500 in bonuses during the build-up to the war, WorldNetDaily has<br \/>\nlearned.<br \/>\n<P>Thomas Rider, as acting director of Energy&#8217;s intelligence office, overruled senior intelligence<br \/>\nofficers on his staff in voting for the position at a National Foreign Intelligence Board meeting at<br \/>\nCIA headquarters last September. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>His officers argued at a pre-briefing at Energy headquarters that there was no hard evidence<br \/>\nto support the alarming Iraq nuclear charge, and asked to join State Department&#8217;s dissenting<br \/>\nopinion, Energy officials say. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Rider ordered them to &#8220;shut up and sit down,&#8221; according to sources familiar with the meeting.<br \/>\n<\/P><br \/>\n<P>As a result, State was the intelligence community&#8217;s lone dissenter in the key National<br \/>\nIntelligence Estimate on Iraq&#8217;s alleged weapons of mass destruction, something the Bush<br \/>\nadministration is quick to remind critics of its prewar intelligence. So far no banned weapons have<br \/>\nbeen found in Iraq to confirm its charges. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>The secret 90-page report, prepared Oct. 1 [and used to justify preemptive war in Iraq], was<br \/>\nrushed to sway members of Congress ahead of a key vote on granting the White House<br \/>\nwar-making authority. It also formed the underlying evidence for the White House&#8217;s decision to<br \/>\ngo to war. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham gave Rider a $13,000 performance bonus after the NIE<br \/>\nreport was released and just before the war, department sources say. He had received an<br \/>\nadditional $7,500 before the report. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>&#8220;That&#8217;s a hell of a lot of money for an intelligence director who had no experience or<br \/>\nbackground in intelligence, and who&#8217;d only been running the office for nine months,&#8221; said one<br \/>\nsource who requested anonymity. &#8220;Something&#8217;s fishy.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Rider declined to talk about the payments.<\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>A <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.worldnetdaily.com\/news\/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33948\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>report by Paul Sperry<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>, also for<br \/>\nWorldNetDaily.com, notes: &#8220;Rider, a long-time human resources bureaucrat, served nine months<br \/>\nas acting director of [the Department of] Energy&#8217;s intelligence office. He stepped down in<br \/>\nFebruary, the month before the war. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>&#8220;Energy officials say Rider rubber-stamped the administration&#8217;s conclusion that Baghdad was<br \/>\nreactivating a nuclear weapons program over the objections of Energy&#8217;s nuclear weapons research<br \/>\nlabs and senior members of his own staff.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>And from <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A16133-2004Oct7.html\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>this morning&#8217;s Washington Post<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>:<br \/>\n&#8220;David Kay, who preceded [Charles A.] Duelfer as the chief U.S. weapons inspector, said the<br \/>\nlatest&nbsp;[WMD] report clearly shows that Hussein was not a threat to the United States.<br \/>\n&#8216;Look, Saddam was delusional,&#8217; Kay said on NBC&#8217;s &#8216;Today&#8217; show Thursday. &#8216;He had a lot of<br \/>\nintent. He didn&#8217;t have capabilities. Intent without capabilities is not an imminent threat.'&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Have a look at the <A class=inline href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/6196962\/\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>Kay interview<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>. (Scroll down and<br \/>\nclick on the <B>Kay&#8217;s views<\/B> video.) It&#8217;s a must-see, especially as a prelude to tonight&#8217;s<br \/>\nsecond presidential debate.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m beginning to feel like Johnny One-Note: Here&#8217;s a revealing footnote to the definitive WMD report by the CIA&#8217;s Iraq Survey Group. It sketches how technical experts who doubted that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons were silenced by the Bush gang. Although it appeared in August 2003 at WorldNetDaily, it came to a Straight Up [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-875","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-e7","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=875"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/875\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}