{"id":856,"date":"2004-10-14T10:06:13","date_gmt":"2004-10-14T17:06:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/10\/debating_what_they_forgot\/"},"modified":"2004-10-14T10:06:13","modified_gmt":"2004-10-14T17:06:13","slug":"debating_what_they_forgot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/10\/debating_what_they_forgot.html","title":{"rendered":"DEBATING WHAT THEY FORGOT"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>In last night&#8217;s third debate, which was supposed to be about domestic issues, I didn&#8217;t hear a<br \/>\nsingle mention of oil. Not one word about those three little letters.&nbsp;Yet oil &#8212; supply, cost<br \/>\nand dwindling geological reserves &#8212; is the greatest domestic crisis we are likely to face in this<br \/>\ndecade: Greater than the deficit, jobs, taxes, health care, social security, you name it. Even greater<br \/>\nthan all of them combined.<br \/>\n<P>I&#8217;m not making this up. David Owen is. In a fascinating article in the current New Yorker,<br \/>\n&#8220;Green Manhattan&#8221; (unfortunately not online), which makes the counterintuitive case that our big<br \/>\ncities are more energy efficient and friendlier to the environment than our sprawling suburbs,<br \/>\nOwen quotes a warning from <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/tg\/detail\/-\/0393058573\/qid=1097763761\/sr=1-1\/ref=\nsr_1_1\/103-6861453-4660622?v=glance&#038;s=books\" target='new\"'><B><FONT\ncolor=#003399>&#8220;Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil,&#8221;<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> by David<br \/>\nGoodstein, a professor at the California Institute of Technology.<br \/>\n<P>With roughly half the planet&#8217;s total petroleum supply already consumed, according to<br \/>\nGoodstein&#8217;s book, &#8220;the world will soon start to run out of conventionally produced, cheap oil,&#8221;<br \/>\nand we&#8217;ve got less than 10 years to&nbsp;solve the problem. As&nbsp;Owen writes, the<br \/>\n&#8220;devastating global petroleum crisis will begin not when we have pumped the last barrel out of the<br \/>\nground but when we have reached the halfway point, because at that moment, for the first time in<br \/>\nhistory, the line representing supply will fall through the line representing demand,&#8221; and &#8220;we will<br \/>\nprobably pass that point within the current decade, if we haven&#8217;t passed it already.&#8221;<br \/>\n<P>The result is that &#8220;various well-established laws of economics are about to assert themselves,<br \/>\nwith disastrous repercussions for almost <I>everything<\/I>.&#8221; (Italics added.) And here&#8217;s<br \/>\nGoodstein&#8217;s capper: &#8220;Civilization as we know it will come to an end sometime in this century<br \/>\nunless we can find a way to live without fossil fuels.&#8221;&nbsp;Does that need<br \/>\nrepeating?&nbsp;&nbsp;I think it does: &#8220;Civilization as we know it will come to an end sometime<br \/>\nin this century unless we can find a way to live without fossil fuels.&#8221;&nbsp; If that seems far away<br \/>\nto you, how about this?&nbsp;We&#8217;ll be starting down that road by 2015.<br \/>\n<P>So I leave it to my preferred overnight arbiters&nbsp; <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/10\/14\/politics\/campaign\/14teevee.html?oref=login\"\ntarget='new\"<<b'><STRONG><FONT color=#003399>Alessandra<br \/>\nStanley<\/B><\/FONT><\/STRONG><\/A> and <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A31374-2004Oct14.html\"\ntarget='new\"'><STRONG><FONT color=#003399>Tom<br \/>\nShales<\/B><\/FONT><\/STRONG><\/A> and <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/jameswolcott.com\/archives\/2004\/10\/streaking.php\" target='new\"'><B><FONT\ncolor=#003399>Jame Wolcott<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> to say who won and who lost the third debate.<br \/>\nI&#8217;ll also quote Wolcott,&nbsp;even though I think he gives Kerry too much credit, because his<br \/>\ncomments are the sharpest and because I hope he&#8217;s right.<br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>Bush is now down 3-zip. Blank looks, a trace of drool, bad jokes that hit a wall of flopsweat,<br \/>\nweaselling out on Roe v. Wade and minimum wage, a lot of kerfluffling to fill out his time &#8212; Bush<br \/>\nbombed badly and only avoided disaster because Kerry was too scripted. But Kerry knocked the<br \/>\nassault-weapons issue into the seats and handled the Social Security issue convincingly &#8212; his<br \/>\npoise and knowledgeability carried the night, as I think the polls will reflect. (CNN just came in at<br \/>\n<A class=inline href='http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2004\/ALLPOLITICS\/10\/14\/snap.poll\/index.html\"'\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>Kerry 52, Bush 39<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>, to the<br \/>\nsurprise of their knucklehead pundits.)<\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>As far as I could tell, however, both candidates came in last by failing to address the looming<br \/>\noil crisis. The moderator Bob Shieffer is partly to blame for not asking the question. But if they<br \/>\nhad wanted to deal with the subject they could have. Both had no trouble ignoring any question<br \/>\nthey felt like, simply by replying with boilerplate about some other subject. Both did that so often<br \/>\nit didn&#8217;t matter what question was asked. In pundit parlance that&#8217;s called &#8220;pivoting.&#8221; In the real<br \/>\nworld it&#8217;s called bullshit.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In last night&#8217;s third debate, which was supposed to be about domestic issues, I didn&#8217;t hear a single mention of oil. Not one word about those three little letters.&nbsp;Yet oil &#8212; supply, cost and dwindling geological reserves &#8212; is the greatest domestic crisis we are likely to face in this decade: Greater than the deficit, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-856","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-dO","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=856"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/856\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}