{"id":778,"date":"2004-08-31T10:56:05","date_gmt":"2004-08-31T17:56:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/08\/reading_michael_moores_lips\/"},"modified":"2004-08-31T10:56:05","modified_gmt":"2004-08-31T17:56:05","slug":"reading_michael_moores_lips","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/08\/reading_michael_moores_lips.html","title":{"rendered":"READING MICHAEL MOORE&#8217;S LIPS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>The attack on <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/08\/31\/politics\/campaign\/31moore.html\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;a disingenuous filmmaker&#8221;<\/FONT><\/B><\/A><br \/>\nappears in the <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/politicselections\/nation\/president\/2004-08-30-mccainfulltex\nt_x.htm\" target='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>prepared text<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> of Sen.<br \/>\nJohn McCain&#8217;s speech last night to the Republican National Convention. Did he miscalculate by<br \/>\nnot knowing, as he claims, that the object of his scorn was in the house? Did<br \/>\nhe&nbsp;not&nbsp;realize&nbsp;his attack would boomerang, as I believe it did, for the TV<br \/>\naudience? <\/P><br \/>\n<P>After&nbsp;Republican delegates erupted in chants of &#8220;Four more years!&#8221; at McCain&#8217;s<br \/>\nmention of the unnamed filmaker, the television cameras caught&nbsp;sight&nbsp;of Michael<br \/>\nMoore in the press gallery. Playing the moment with a quick wit,&nbsp;Moore held up two<br \/>\nfingers and shot back: &#8220;Two more months!&#8221; From where I sat, watching the convention on the<br \/>\ntube at home, it was impossible to hear Moore&#8217;s words over the roar of the delegates. But he<br \/>\nmouthed them too clearly to miss. It was a powerful riposte, more effective for having to read his<br \/>\nlips than actually hearing his words.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Moore was in the press gallery observing the convention for an op-ed column for USA<br \/>\nToday. In Monday&#8217;s column, headlined <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/opinion\/2004-08-30-moore-gopamerica_x.htm\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;The GOP doesn&#8217;t reflect<br \/>\nAmerica,&#8221;<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> he wrote:<\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>Hanging out around the convention, I&#8217;ve encountered a number of the<br \/>\nRepublican faithful who aren&#8217;t delegates. They warm up to me when they don&#8217;t find horns or a tail.<br \/>\nTalking to them, I discover they&#8217;re like many people who call themselves Republicans but aren&#8217;t<br \/>\nreally Republicans. At least not in the radical-right way that George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, John<br \/>\nAshcroft and Co. have defined Republicans. &#8230;<br \/>\n<P>I&#8217;ve often found that if I go down the list of &#8220;liberal&#8221; issues with people who say they&#8217;re<br \/>\nRepublican, they are quite liberal and not in sync with the Republicans who run the country. Most<br \/>\ndon&#8217;t want America to be the world&#8217;s police officer and prefer peace to war. They applaud civil<br \/>\nrights, believe all Americans should have health insurance and think assault weapons should be<br \/>\nbanned. Though they may personally oppose abortion, they usually don&#8217;t think the government has<br \/>\nthe right to tell a women what to do with her body.<\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Moore&#8217;s a smart guy. He probably took his cue from Louis Menand. Remember what Menand<br \/>\nwrote in The New Yorker last week in his dissection of the electorate? Citing Stanford social<br \/>\nscientist Morris Fiornia, as noted here a week ago in <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20040801.shtml#85475\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>WEATHERING THE<br \/>\nSHORTCUTS<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>, Menand wrote that there is no culture war among Americans<br \/>\nat large, despite polls indicating that the public is polarized into a &#8220;red state-blue state&#8221; paradigm.<br \/>\nOpinions on most hot-button issues do not differ significantly between voters in red states and<br \/>\nvoters in blue states.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Here&#8217;s hoping it&#8217;s true &#8212; because if it is, then &#8220;Two more months!&#8221; won&#8217;t be a hope but a<br \/>\nprediction.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>Postscript:<\/STRONG> It&#8217;s&nbsp;odd that Washington Post reporters Mark<br \/>\nLeibovich and Paul Farhi make no mention of Moore&#8217;s riposte in their <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A48292-2004Aug31.html\"><B><FONT\ncolor=#003399>news story<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> about the attention he drew at the<br \/>\nconvention.&nbsp;But if you click on the video attached to their story, &#8220;McCain Criticizes Moore<br \/>\nin Speech,&#8221; and keep watching, you&#8217;ll see it: It&#8217;s unmistakable. <\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The attack on &#8220;a disingenuous filmmaker&#8221; appears in the prepared text of Sen. John McCain&#8217;s speech last night to the Republican National Convention. Did he miscalculate by not knowing, as he claims, that the object of his scorn was in the house? Did he&nbsp;not&nbsp;realize&nbsp;his attack would boomerang, as I believe it did, for the TV [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-778","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-cy","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=778"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/778\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}