{"id":775,"date":"2004-08-25T01:30:27","date_gmt":"2004-08-25T08:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/08\/now_for_some_more_scienceficti\/"},"modified":"2021-11-06T10:26:43","modified_gmt":"2021-11-06T14:26:43","slug":"now_for_some_more_scienceficti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/08\/now_for_some_more_scienceficti.html","title":{"rendered":"NOW FOR SOME MORE SCIENCE-FICTION REALITY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By Jan Herman<\/p>\n<p>Remember the\u00a0mysterious black barge anchored in the Hudson River between the\u00a0Manhattan and Jersey shores during our <a class=\"inline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20031201.shtml#64294\" target=\"new&quot;\" rel=\"noopener\"><b><span style=\"color: #003399;\">Code Orange New Year<\/span><\/b><\/a> eight\u00a0months ago? Well,\u00a0the barge is\u00a0back. Make that two of them. And just in time for the\u00a0National Republican Convention at Madison Square Garden, which will be protected by &#8220;the\u00a0largest armada of land, air and maritime forces ever assembled to provide security at a national\u00a0political gathering.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Our Upper West Side spotter, who checked the barges out yesterday with her binoculars,\u00a0wonders whether they&#8217;re platforms for guided-missile launchers to protect the city from an\u00a0airborne attack. The last time they appeared in the river we never did solve the barge mystery.\u00a0This morning&#8217;s <a class=\"inline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/08\/25\/politics\/campaign\/25threat.html\" target=\"new&quot;\" rel=\"noopener\"><b><span style=\"color: #003399;\">report on convention security<\/span><\/b><\/a> in\u00a0The New York Times makes no mention of missile launchers stationed in the Hudson. It does say\u00a0that 26 police launches will patrol the city&#8217;s waterways and that seven surveillance helicopters will\u00a0be patrolling the skies.<\/p>\n<p>I guess we should also mention the 181 bomb-sniffing dogs to be put on the streets and\u00a0subways,\u00a0in additon\u00a0to plainclothes detectives who will &#8220;eyeball&#8221; other riders, along\u00a0with 10,000 police officers to be stationed around Madison Square Garden itself, including\u00a0&#8220;special heavily armed &#8216;Hercules&#8217; antiterror squads, snipers and phalanxes of officers set up around\u00a0the arena to search buses and trucks.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And let&#8217;s not forget: The police will have on hand a bit of high-tech sonic weaponry just in\u00a0case noisy demonstrators need to be brought into line. As reported by the Associated Press, it was\u00a0unveiled last week as part of\u00a0 <a class=\"inline\" href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=694&amp;u=\/ap\/20040819\/ap_on_el_pr\/gop_con\nvention_protest_12&amp;printer=1\" target=\"new&quot;\" rel=\"noopener\"><b><span style=\"color: #003399;\">&#8220;a mini-arsenal of\u00a0devices and counterterrorism equipment.&#8221;<\/span><\/b><\/a> Called the LRAD (for Long Range\u00a0Acoustic Device),\u00a0the\u00a0weapon\u00a0was &#8220;developed for the military and [is] capable\u00a0of blasting warnings, orders or anything else at an ear-splitting 150 decibels.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The police plan to mount two LRADS on Humvees posted outside the arena. &#8220;It would mark\u00a0the first time the instrument &#8212; which can beam sounds for 300 yards or more &#8212; has been used by\u00a0a civilian force.&#8221; This does not go down well with Bill Dobbs of <a class=\"inline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.unitedforpeace.org\/\" target=\"new&quot;\" rel=\"noopener\"><b><span style=\"color: #003399;\">United for\u00a0Peace and Justice<\/span><\/b><\/a>, which has planned a massive antiwar demonstration on the\u00a0eve of the convention. He called the sound system &#8220;a potential Big Brother nightmare.&#8221; Police\u00a0&#8220;are trying to use technology and machinery to control every aspect of life on the street,&#8221; he said,\u00a0&#8220;rather than relax a little and let a part of democratic society unfold.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Compared with infrasound, however, the LRAD is a light tap on the shoulder. Imagine the\u00a0authorities\u00a0getting hold of one of French robotics scientist Vladimir Gavreau&#8217;s &#8220;police\u00a0whistle,&#8221; sometimes called a &#8220;sound cannon.&#8221; It&#8217;s an infrasonic device so lethal there is reportedly\u00a0no known defense against it. By lowering the frequency of sound below 15 cycles per second &#8212;\u00a0so low that the sound can&#8217;t be humanly heard &#8212; such a device is capable of spreading death and\u00a0destruction from a source that is impossible to detect without special equipment.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At a very specific pitch, infrasound explodes matter,&#8221; <a class=\"inline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.borderlands.com\/archives\/arch\/gavreaus.htm\" target=\"new&quot;\" rel=\"noopener\"><b><span style=\"color: #003399;\">Gerry Vassilatos writes<\/span><\/b><\/a> about Gavreau&#8217;s experiments from\u00a0the 1930s to the 1970s. &#8220;At others, infrasound incapacitates and kills. Organisms rupture in its\u00a0blast.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Years ago, as far back as the 1960s, the author William S. Burroughs wrote about using\u00a0sound as a weapon. In a wide-ranging <a class=\"inline\" href=\"http:\/\/gorgeaway.blogspot.com\/\" target=\"new&quot;\" rel=\"noopener\"><b><span style=\"color: #003399;\">1984 interview<\/span><\/b><\/a>, he noted: &#8220;It is\u00a0no exaggeration to say that all important research is now top secret, until someone lets a rat out\u00a0of the bag. Infrasound, for example.&#8221; How does infrasound work? Burroughs explained in\u00a0layman&#8217;s terms:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>As everyone knows, sound is a succession of waves in which the air is\u00a0alternatively compressed and decompressed. Fast vibrations either go right through solid objects\u00a0or bounce off them, usually doing relatively little harm even when very powerful. But slow\u00a0vibration, below the hearing level, can create a sort of pendulum action, a reverberation in solid\u00a0objects that quickly builds up to intolerable intensity.\u00a0To study this phenomenon the [Gavreau] team built a giant whistle, hooked to a compressed\u00a0air hose. Then they turned on the air. Professor Gavreau says: &#8220;Luckily, we were able to turn it\u00a0off quickly. All of us were sick for hours. Everything in us was vibrating: stomach, heart, lungs.\u00a0All the people in the other laboratories were sick too. They were very angry with\u00a0us.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Gavreau discovered that the wave length &#8220;most dangerous to human life&#8221; is 7 Hertz (sevencycles per second). Some of the invisible injuries to Gavreau and his team were more persistent.\u00a0According to another account, they &#8220;were dangerously ill for days, their internal organs wracked\u00a0with painful spasms as a result of their body cavities having resonated at the deadly frequency.&#8221;\u00a0They had only just escaped being &#8220;torn apart&#8221; by their own experiment.\u00a0What&#8217;s\u00a0more,\u00a0&#8220;the entire test building was shaken and nearly destroyed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Claims like that are hard to believe. But others go further. In one test, reportedly &#8220;involving a\u00a0device less than a cubic metre in volume,&#8221; Gavreau&#8217;s team &#8220;caused a large, fan-shaped portion of\u00a0Marseilles to shake. Later, a mounted and remotely controlled version [of the device] was said to\u00a0have &#8216;burst heavy battlements and tank interiors open with a hideous effortlessness.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And Burroughs notes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>In developing a military weapon, scientists intend to revert to a policeman&#8217;s\u00a0whistle form, perhaps as big as eighteen feet across, mount it on a truck and blow it with a fan\u00a0turned by a small airplane engine. This weapon, they say, will give forth an all-destroying 10,000\u00a0acoustic watts. It could kill a man five miles away. There is one snag: at present, the machine is as\u00a0dangerous to its operators as to the enemy.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>That wouldn&#8217;t deter suicide infrasounders. But we&#8217;re grateful for the snag.\u00a0In any\u00a0case,\u00a0he was talking about the situation in 1984. What has been developed since? For a\u00a0more recent, extended essay on infrasound weaponry, see <a class=\"inline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.forteantimes.com\/articles\/153_sonicweapons.shtml\" target=\"new&quot;\" rel=\"noopener\"><b><span style=\"color: #003399;\">&#8220;Sonic Doom,&#8221;<\/span><\/b><\/a>\u00a0an article by Jack Sergeant and David\u00a0Sutton in the Fortean Times. They debunk the effectiveness of such weapons.<\/p>\n<p>Although Vassilatos writes that &#8220;infrasound does not lose its intensity when travelling very\u00a0long distances across the ground&#8221; and remains &#8220;at the same intensity as when released,&#8221; Sergeant\u00a0and Sutton contradict him. They write:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The main difficulty lies in propagating the sound waves over distance to their\u00a0intended target, a possibility hampered by the tendency of low-frequency waves to expand in all\u00a0directions, thus losing focused power, and of high-frequency waves to enter a &#8220;shocked state&#8221;\u00a0where energy is lost to the air.\u00a0So sonic weapons, even those employing ultrasound and infrasound, would only work over\u00a0very short distances and, rather than resulting in the kinds of psychological or physical effects\u00a0claimed by conspiracy-heads or military nuts, would probably just cause serious and permanent\u00a0hearing damage.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Their conclusion? &#8220;Sonic weapons, despite the oft-repeated claims, would most likely be\u00a0large, cumbersome, close-range devices resulting in ruptured eardrums.&#8221; Who is correct? Whom\u00a0to believe? We don&#8217;t know. But we&#8217;d hate like hell to find out at the National Republican\u00a0Convention.<\/p>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Jan Herman Remember the\u00a0mysterious black barge anchored in the Hudson River between the\u00a0Manhattan and Jersey shores during our Code Orange New Year eight\u00a0months ago? Well,\u00a0the barge is\u00a0back. Make that two of them. And just in time for the\u00a0National Republican Convention at Madison Square Garden, which will be protected by &#8220;the\u00a0largest armada of land, air [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-775","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-cv","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=775"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48706,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775\/revisions\/48706"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=775"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=775"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=775"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}