{"id":737,"date":"2004-05-27T10:18:42","date_gmt":"2004-05-27T17:18:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/05\/unfinished_business_2\/"},"modified":"2004-05-27T10:18:42","modified_gmt":"2004-05-27T17:18:42","slug":"unfinished_business_2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/05\/unfinished_business_2.html","title":{"rendered":"UNFINISHED BUSINESS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Before taking a few days off for the long Memorial Day weekend, we feel an obligation to<br \/>\naddress some unfinished business: a recent email exchange with blogger Steve Sailer involving the<br \/>\nitem <A class=inline href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20040501.shtml#7811\"\ntarget='new\"'><B><EM><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;Scraping Bottom&#8221;<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A><br \/>\n(May 10), which followed up on an earlier item, <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20040501.shtml#77699\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>&#8220;The Spectrum from Blue to Red&#8221;<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> (May 5). If<br \/>\nposting the exchange smacks of a little too much inside baseball, we apologize. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>&#8212;&#8211; Original Message &#8212;&#8211; <BR>From: SteveSlr@aol.com <BR>To:<br \/>\njherman@artsjournal.com <BR>Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 8:01 PM<BR>Subject:<br \/>\n&#8220;Anti-Semitic slur&#8221;?<\/P><br \/>\n<P>You posted:<br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><I>SCRAPING BOTTOM<\/I><\/P><br \/>\n<P><I>Thanks to anti-liberal columnist and blogger Steve Sailer for clarifying the chart that<br \/>\ncorrelated state-by-state average IQs and income with the votes for Bush or Gore in the 2000<br \/>\npresidential election. When we posted the item &#8220;The Spectrum from Blue to Red,&#8221; we wrote:<br \/>\n&#8220;The chart that explains it all for you&#8221; (an homage to Christopher Durang&#8217;s outrageous satire,<br \/>\n&#8220;Sister Mary Explains It All For You,&#8221; which drove conservatives nuts). We also wrote that the<br \/>\nchart &#8220;could be a joke,&#8221; but &#8220;if so, it&#8217;s a good one. No worse, certainly, than the outcome&#8221; of the<br \/>\nelection.<\/I><\/P><br \/>\n<P><I>The trouble with Sailer&#8217;s clarification is that he gets to the bottom of things by scraping<br \/>\nbottom with an anti-Semitic slur when he writes that &#8220;anyone familiar with the topic would<br \/>\nquickly recognize the fallaciousness of the data. The 113 [IQ] figure for Connecticut is way too<br \/>\nhigh. That&#8217;s about what Connecticut would be if it was all-Jewish.&#8221;<\/I><\/P><br \/>\n<P><I>posted by janherman @ Monday, May 10, 2004 | Permanent<br \/>\nlink\/<\/I><\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Dear Sir or Madam:<\/P><br \/>\n<P>You accused me of making an anti-Semitic slur, which is a very serious accusation, by<br \/>\nmentioning that the average IQ of Ashkenazi Jews in America is around 113.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Considering that you slurred Republicans by publishing fraudulent IQ data, I&#8217;d be fascinated<br \/>\nto learn the logic by which you arrived at the conclusion that I slurred Jews by mentioning<br \/>\naccurate data. I&#8217;m familiar with about ten different estimates of American Jewish IQs published in<br \/>\nrefereed scientific journals. They range from 107.5 to 118. The scientist who is currently working<br \/>\nthe most on this topic told me that 113 is the best estimate. All the real world correlates of IQ &#8212;<br \/>\neducational level, income, scientific and literary accomplishments, etc. &#8212; are roughly in line with<br \/>\nthat figure.<BR><BR>You seem to be implying that Jews are less intelligent. Besides apologizing<br \/>\nto me, you should apologize for making an anti-Semitic slur.<BR><BR>Steve Sailer<\/P><br \/>\n<P>&#8212;&#8211; Original Message &#8212;&#8211; <BR>From: jherman@artsjournal.com<BR>To:<br \/>\nSteveSlr@aol.com <BR>Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 7:42 PM<BR>Subject: Re: &#8220;Anti-Semitic<br \/>\nslur&#8221;?<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Dear Mr. Sailer &#8212;<BR><BR>You just don&#8217;t get it. What was the point of singling out the<br \/>\nJews as a group? It doesn&#8217;t matter what their collective IQ is, high or low. They as a group had<br \/>\nnothing to do with the issue you&#8217;re so riled up about. By singling them out in the way you did<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re trying to paint them as some sort of &#8220;other,&#8221; something separate and alien, which is at the<br \/>\nroot of anti-Semitism. There also seemed to me an implicit ridicule. Why didn&#8217;t you name some<br \/>\nother group? Why choose the Jews? Further, in harping on how I fell for a hoax, you conveniently<br \/>\nignored what I wrote in my original post of the chart: &#8220;This could be a joke. If so, it&#8217;s a good one.<br \/>\nNo worse, certainly, than the outcome of the 2000 election.&#8221;<BR><BR>Sincerely,<BR>Jan<br \/>\nHerman<\/P><br \/>\n<P><B>Footnote:<\/B> Sailer never mentioned &#8220;Ashkenazi&#8221; Jews in his original blog. Even if he<br \/>\nhad, singling them out among Jews in general because of some actual study, worthy or not (which<br \/>\nalso went unmentioned), would not have mitigated the offense.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Before taking a few days off for the long Memorial Day weekend, we feel an obligation to address some unfinished business: a recent email exchange with blogger Steve Sailer involving the item &#8220;Scraping Bottom&#8221; (May 10), which followed up on an earlier item, &#8220;The Spectrum from Blue to Red&#8221; (May 5). If posting the exchange [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-737","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-bT","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/737\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}