{"id":715,"date":"2004-06-08T09:03:07","date_gmt":"2004-06-08T16:03:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/06\/back_from_reaganville\/"},"modified":"2004-06-08T09:03:07","modified_gmt":"2004-06-08T16:03:07","slug":"back_from_reaganville","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/06\/back_from_reaganville.html","title":{"rendered":"BACK FROM REAGANVILLE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>So you doubted the White House bonehead, Rummy boy, chief crony Cheney and the rest of<br \/>\nthe gang had&nbsp;dirty hands? You believed the use of torture on Iraqi prisoners was the<br \/>\nlow-level notion of &#8220;a few bad apples&#8221; and not the systematic plan of higher-ups? You didn&#8217;t (or<br \/>\ncouldn&#8217;t) believe the rule of law as we&#8217;ve known it is being corrupted by authoritarian zealots?<br \/>\n<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Well, The Wall Street Journal had a frontpage exclusive Monday that demolishes those pretty<br \/>\nlittle myths. It began: &#8220;Bush administration lawyers contended last year that the president wasn&#8217;t<br \/>\nbound by laws prohibiting torture and that government agents who might torture prisoners at his<br \/>\ndirection couldn&#8217;t be prosecuted by the Justice Department.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>WSJ reporter Jess Bravin uncovered a classified report &#8212; drafted just&nbsp;two weeks<br \/>\nbefore the Iraq invasion commenced &#8212; arguing that &#8220;the president, despite domestic and<br \/>\ninternational laws constraining the use of torture, has the authority as commander in chief to<br \/>\napprove almost any physical or psychological actions during interrogation, up to and including<br \/>\ntorture,&#8221;<BR><BR>It&#8217;s too bad the WSJ is not available online except by subscription. In the<br \/>\nsecond graf, the story revealed that &#8220;[t]he advice was part of a classified report on interrogation<br \/>\nmethods prepared for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after commanders at Guantanamo Bay,<br \/>\nCuba, complained in late 2002 that with conventional methods they weren&#8217;t getting enough<br \/>\ninformation from prisoners.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>The third graf continued:<\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>The report outlined U.S. laws and international treaties forbidding torture, and<br \/>\nwhy those restrictions might be overcome by national-security considerations or legal<br \/>\ntechnicalities. In a March 6, 2003, draft of the report reviewed by The Wall Street Journal,<br \/>\npassages were deleted as was an attachment listing specific interrogation techniques and whether<br \/>\nMr. Rumsfeld himself or other officials must grant permission before they could be used. The<br \/>\ncomplete draft document was classified &#8220;secret&#8221; by Mr. Rumsfeld and scheduled for<br \/>\ndeclassification in 2013.<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>I see this morning&#8217;s Washington Post (burying its acknowledgment of&nbsp;the Journal) has<br \/>\na <A href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A23373-2004Jun7.html\"\ntarget='new\"' clas=\"inline\"><B><EM><FONT color=#003399>frontpage<br \/>\nfollow<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> that advances the story. It reveals that&nbsp;an even earlier<br \/>\nmemo from the Justice Department &#8220;offered justification for [the] use of torture&#8221; and was the<br \/>\nbasis for the March 2003 report. The Post&#8217;s story begins:<\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>In August 2002, the Justice Department advised the White House that<br \/>\ntorturing al Qaeda terrorists in captivity abroad &#8220;may be justified,&#8221; and that international laws<br \/>\nagainst torture &#8220;may be unconstitutional if applied to interrogations&#8221; conducted in President<br \/>\nBush&#8217;s war on terrorism, according to a newly obtained memo.<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>This morning&#8217;s New York Times also has a <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/06\/08\/politics\/08ABUS.html?hp\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>frontpage follow<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> acknowledging the Journal. It<br \/>\nbegins:<\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>A team of administration lawyers concluded in a March 2003 legal<br \/>\nmemorandum that President Bush was not bound by either an international treaty prohibiting<br \/>\ntorture or by a federal antitorture law because he had the authority as commander in chief to<br \/>\napprove any technique needed to protect the nation&#8217;s security.<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>The Post&nbsp;notes: &#8220;The documents, which address treatment of al Qaeda and Taliban<br \/>\ndetainees, were not written to apply to detainees held in Iraq.&#8221; But read&nbsp;the<br \/>\nreports&nbsp;and tell me if you still believe the pretty little myths. <\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So you doubted the White House bonehead, Rummy boy, chief crony Cheney and the rest of the gang had&nbsp;dirty hands? You believed the use of torture on Iraqi prisoners was the low-level notion of &#8220;a few bad apples&#8221; and not the systematic plan of higher-ups? You didn&#8217;t (or couldn&#8217;t) believe the rule of law as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-715","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-bx","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/715\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}