{"id":671,"date":"2004-04-30T09:34:01","date_gmt":"2004-04-30T16:34:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/04\/scribble_scribble\/"},"modified":"2004-04-30T09:34:01","modified_gmt":"2004-04-30T16:34:01","slug":"scribble_scribble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/04\/scribble_scribble.html","title":{"rendered":"SCRIBBLE, SCRIBBLE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Is someone at CNN reading us (and taking notes)? You decide.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>CNN flashed these words across the tube on Thursday morning: &#8220;not under oath,&#8221; &#8220;no<br \/>\nstenographer,&#8221; &#8220;no transcript,&#8221; &#8220;no recording.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Straight Up on Wednesday morning in <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20040401.shtml#77133\"><STRONG><EM><\nFONT color=#003399>LIP SERVICE<\/FONT><\/EM><\/STRONG><\/A>: &#8220;Not under oath. Not<br \/>\nin public. No recording. No transcript. Two note takers only.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Both of us were referring, of course, to the ventriloquist and his dummy&#8217;s performance for the<br \/>\n9\/11 commission.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Thanks to <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/04\/30\/politics\/30WATC.html\"><STRONG><FONT\ncolor=#003399><EM>Alessandra Stanley,<\/EM><\/FONT><\/STRONG> <\/A>whose TV Watch<br \/>\nreports we love, for pointing out CNN&#8217;s bulletins. Her eye for detail and her salty comments are<br \/>\nalways rewarding.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Stanley&#8217;s&nbsp;lede this morning:<\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>If an important meeting takes place in the Oval Office and there are no<br \/>\ntelevision cameras to record it, did the meeting matter?<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>And her conclusion:<br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>[T]he nonvisual event was so anathema to television that at one point, the<br \/>\nCNN anchor Daryn Kagan said it seemed as if &#8220;the event took place in the 18th<br \/>\ncentury.&#8221;<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>By the way, it&#8217;s now unclear how many note takers there actually were. Reports have varied.<br \/>\nIt turns out that all the commissioners were at least <I>allowed<\/I> to take notes. We don&#8217;t<br \/>\nknow, however, what they may have scribbled down. &#8220;Their <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/04\/30\/politics\/30BUSH.html?hp\"><STRONG><EM><FON\nT color=#003399>notebooks were taken from them<\/FONT><\/EM><\/STRONG><\/A> before<br \/>\nthey left the session,&#8221; The New York Times reports, &#8220;with the White House saying they would be<br \/>\nreturned after being reviewed for classified information.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>A reminder from yesterday:<\/STRONG> If you want to see the&nbsp;dummy at<br \/>\nhis most inarticulate, just go to <A href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>CNN.com<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> and click the <B>video<\/B> link (on the<br \/>\nright) next to the headline <B>&#8220;Bush 9\/11 session &#8216;marvelous&#8217;.&#8221;<\/B> It&#8217;s absolutely hilarious.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Is someone at CNN reading us (and taking notes)? You decide. CNN flashed these words across the tube on Thursday morning: &#8220;not under oath,&#8221; &#8220;no stenographer,&#8221; &#8220;no transcript,&#8221; &#8220;no recording.&#8221; Straight Up on Wednesday morning in < FONT color=#003399>LIP SERVICE: &#8220;Not under oath. Not in public. No recording. No transcript. Two note takers only.&#8221; Both [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-671","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-aP","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/671\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}