{"id":670,"date":"2004-05-04T10:00:35","date_gmt":"2004-05-04T17:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/05\/pen_sends_a_letter\/"},"modified":"2004-05-04T10:00:35","modified_gmt":"2004-05-04T17:00:35","slug":"pen_sends_a_letter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/05\/pen_sends_a_letter.html","title":{"rendered":"PEN SENDS A LETTER"},"content":{"rendered":"

The PEN American
\nCenter<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> has called for the current occupant of the White House “to
\nabandon Patriot Act politics” and lead “an open, bipartisan evaluation of individual provisions of
\nthe Act that are scheduled to end by 2005, including Section 215, which opens records of
\nindividual reading activities to government scrutiny.”<\/P>
\n

Good luck.<\/P>
\n

Section 215, in case you don’t remember, amended and greatly expanded the scope of the
\n1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>. The FBI now
\nhas the right to examine “any tangible things” — to quote the law — including bookstore and
\nlibrary records, PEN said in a press release issued Monday. <\/P>
\n

Under Title II, Section 215, of the USA Patriot Act<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>, investigators can seek
\nrecords even of individuals not suspected of terrorism. It also has a gag provision that prevents
\ninstitutions from disclosing that their records have been examined. <\/P>
\n

“Like many sectors of the literary community,” PEN “fears that such sweeping authority
\nthreatens the privacy necessary for law-abiding citizens and residents to explore controversial
\ninformation and ideas.”<\/P>
\n

The PEN American Center is an association of more than is 2,600 writers and editors. It is
\nthe largest of nearly 130 PEN Centers worldwide that compose International PEN, which has
\npromoted literature and protected freedom of
\nexpression<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> for more than 80 years.<\/P>
\n

The sunset provisions of the Patriot Act, says Larry Siems, the director of PEN’s Freedom to
\nWrite and International Programs, “were built in to ensure that Congress would look carefully
\nboth at how the elements of the law are working to thwart terrorism and whether particular
\nprovisions are compromising essential liberties.”<\/P>
\n

PEN has sent a letter to the White House “endorsing strong, targeted measures to confront
\nterrorism and prevent terrorist attacks,” but also “pressing for refinements and improvements to
\nthe Patriot Act and other post-9\/11 security measures to protect privacy, ensure public access to
\ngovernment information, and comply with international law and human rights covenants.”<\/P>
\n

The letter, co-signed by PEN American Center President Salman Rushdie, asks the current
\noccupant of the White House to “protect and promote a critical and open review of the sunset
\nprovisions, one that acknowledges the shared commitment of all participants to the security and
\nsafety of U.S. citizens, residents, and interests and that allows for changes born of wisdom and
\nexperience.”<\/P>
\n

The Maximum Leader is doubtless all ears. Here is Attorney General Ashcroft’s
\nview<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> of the USA Patriot Act. Read it at your own risk.
<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The PEN American Center has called for the current occupant of the White House “to abandon Patriot Act politics” and lead “an open, bipartisan evaluation of individual provisions of the Act that are scheduled to end by 2005, including Section 215, which opens records of individual reading activities to government scrutiny.” Good luck. Section 215, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-670","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-aO","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=670"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/670\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}