{"id":617,"date":"2004-04-12T09:48:55","date_gmt":"2004-04-12T16:48:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/04\/stone_gets_tough_on_fidel\/"},"modified":"2004-04-12T09:48:55","modified_gmt":"2004-04-12T16:48:55","slug":"stone_gets_tough_on_fidel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/04\/stone_gets_tough_on_fidel.html","title":{"rendered":"STONE GETS TOUGH  ON FIDEL"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Oliver Stone&#8217;s <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.hbo.com\/docs\/programs\/looking_fidel\/index.html?ntrack_para1=latest4_more\"\n><B><EM><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;Looking for Fidel,&#8221;<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> to premiere<br \/>\nWednesday on HBO, is called the follow-up in tough mode to &#8220;Commandante,&#8221; his previous<br \/>\nsoftball portrait of the Cuban leader. This time, instead of tossing bouqets at Castro in a loving<br \/>\n(some said fawning) approach to El Commandante, Stone reportedly confronts him about his<br \/>\nvicious crackdown on political dissidents and the shocking execution of three Cuban ferry<br \/>\nhijackers who were barely out of their teens.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>According to the <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.hbo.com\/docs\/programs\/looking_fidel\/synopsis.html\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>HBO synopsis<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> of &#8220;Looking for Fidel,&#8221; Stone<br \/>\ninterviewed key players besides Castro, including &#8220;prisoners accused of hijacking, leading<br \/>\ndissidents, wives of prisoners and human rights advocates. &#8230; In one extraordinary roundtable,<br \/>\nStone brings together Castro, several accused hijackers, prosecutors and defense attorneys &#8230;&#8221;<br \/>\nThat ought to be interesting. Even Cubans who idolized Castro were thunderstruck by the three<br \/>\nexecutions and reportedly felt they were the ultimate, unconscionable betrayal of the<br \/>\nCuban&nbsp;revolution.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>The AP&#8217;s <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.newsday.com\/news\/local\/wire\/ny-bc-ny--apontv-lookingfor0410apr10,0,60330\n32.story?coll=ny-ap-regional-wire\"><B><EM><FONT color=#003399>Frazier Moore<br \/>\nwrites<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> that HBO viewers &#8220;were spared &#8216;Comandante&#8217; when the<br \/>\nnetwork yanked it before its scheduled airdate a year ago.&#8221; That film &#8220;was undone last spring&#8221;<br \/>\nbecause of the crackdown and executions. &#8220;No less a defect,&#8221; Frazier adds, &#8220;&#8216;Comandante'&#8221; was a<br \/>\nbarely coherent vanity production placing the filmmaker at its core while dabbling with the<br \/>\nquestion: Who&#8217;s that old fellow with the beard beside Oliver Stone?&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Moore says &#8220;Looking for Fidel&#8221; is &#8220;a much more balanced portrait&#8221; though &#8220;hampered by<br \/>\nstylishly fidgety camera work and choppy editing.&#8221; <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/04\/11\/movies\/11MITC.html\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>Elvis Mitchell<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>&nbsp;of&nbsp;The New York<br \/>\nTimes,&nbsp;who has also seen both films, writes that &#8220;Fidel&#8221; is &#8220;much grimmer&#8221; than<br \/>\n&#8220;Commandante&#8221; and is &#8220;charged with intensity.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Stone told Mitchell that this time he did his homework. He noted, however, that he did not<br \/>\nintend the follow-up &#8220;to be a document, like an Amnesty International inquiry into each and every<br \/>\nprisoner. But,&#8221; Stone said, &#8220;I did film the dissidents, to hear what they had to say. &#8216;Fidel&#8217; is more<br \/>\nnarrow in focus; I tried to get him angry this time.&#8221; And was he successful in provoking El<br \/>\nCommandante? &#8220;Yes,&#8221; Stone said, &#8220;he was defensive.&#8221; In the first film, the director also concedes:<br \/>\n&#8220;Perhaps I was pandering, perhaps I was softballing him with the questions, as some people<br \/>\nsay.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>For more background have a look at <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20031109.shtml#59512\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>VERGING ON CUBA<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>, an item from last November<br \/>\nabout a panel discussion by novelists Russell Banks and William Kennedy, who had recently spent<br \/>\ntime with Castro; New Yorker writer John Lee Anderson, who lived in Havana for a year;<br \/>\nCuban-American novelist Achy Obejas; Norman Pearlstein, editor-in-chief of Time Inc.; Terry<br \/>\nMcCoy, editor of <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/0821228021\/qid%3D1068483358\/sr%3Dka-1\/\nref%3Dpd%5Fka%5F1\/103-9140836-8675042\"><B><EM><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;Cuba on<br \/>\nthe Verge: An Island in Transition,&#8221;<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>&nbsp;and others with a longtime<br \/>\ninterest in Cuba.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>What struck me then as most revealing was 1) what Banks had to say about the cohering<br \/>\nforce of Cuba&#8217;s national mythology, comparing its strength&nbsp;to Israel&#8217;s and that of the United<br \/>\nStates, and 2) Obejas&#8217;s conclusion that, regardless of whether or when Castro goes or who<br \/>\nreplaces him, the greatest influence on daily life in Cuba will depend on American politics more<br \/>\nthan its own.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oliver Stone&#8217;s &#8220;Looking for Fidel,&#8221; to premiere Wednesday on HBO, is called the follow-up in tough mode to &#8220;Commandante,&#8221; his previous softball portrait of the Cuban leader. This time, instead of tossing bouqets at Castro in a loving (some said fawning) approach to El Commandante, Stone reportedly confronts him about his vicious crackdown on political [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-617","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-9X","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/617\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}