{"id":605,"date":"2004-04-12T12:40:53","date_gmt":"2004-04-12T19:40:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/04\/blogger_stardust\/"},"modified":"2004-04-12T12:40:53","modified_gmt":"2004-04-12T19:40:53","slug":"blogger_stardust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/04\/blogger_stardust.html","title":{"rendered":"BLOGGER STARDUST"},"content":{"rendered":"

A friend asked (this is true): “How’s the blogging life?” My reply: “Underpaid and overrated.”
\nThe overraters tend to be johnnys-come-lately who believe they’ve had a revelation when, in fact,
\nall they’ve done is plugged in. The underpayers are everyone else — in other words, the readers.
\nThe truth is that, like much else on the Web, blogs would dry up if readers had to pay for them.
\n<\/P>
\n

They might dry up anyway. Blogs are said to be proliferating and their influence spreading.
\nYeah, like stardust. I’ve noticed lately that even at no charge some of the best blogs have already
\ngone silent. For instance, the literary MobyLives<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> went into hibernation many months ago.
\nEarlier this year, on Jan. 5, readers were told that “Moby is almost done resting.” It’s still not
\nback. <\/P>
\n

One of the savviest and earliest of the personal culture commentators was Marc Weisblott.
\nHis Weisblogg<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> always seemed to me ahead of the curve
\nin style and subject. Then he quit. Why? “I gave up the blog with grander heights in mind,”
\nhe says, “specifically a project where the blog will be sponsored and have a print mag affiliation —
\nand, of course, those have been slow to reveal themselves … a meeting a month ago and then …
\nwell, waiting.” <\/P>
\n

My question prompted him to bring back his URL, I’m glad to report. Weisblott says he’s
\n“dipping back into the action, but meanwhile reconstituting some of [his] past efforts.” So
\ngo look. Here’s an innaresting<\/EM> rumination, chosen at random, on the “friendship recession”<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> noticed by The Wall Street
\nJournal in 2002.<\/P>
\n

Postscript:<\/STRONG> From a reader: “Golly, a man in a snit — and
\nGoddamit!, well done & good for you and whatever slim justice there is in these mean times! But
\nI feel exempt from the general firestorm, as you’re the only blogger I read.  Still, a
\nlittle inconsistency in the argument — Paul Krugman is nothing more than a paid blogger, as was
\nEdmund Wilson, or Malcolm Cowley, or Mencken and other assorted smarties. You guys
\ndo the work for us dummies. I mean, I didn’t have to be a whale to get a fix on ‘Moby Dick,’ but I
\ndo praise Big Herm for the effort in my behalf, and he helped a lot. <\/P>
\n

“Furthermore, as an advocate of Chaos Theory, these are glad and pleasurable days. The
\ndisintegration of the Bush cheap-jack-C.B-DeMille-plaster-board-and-plastic-executive stockade
\nis lousy special effects but wonderful spectacle. May it prevail, although instead of Vic
\nMature and Hedy Lemarr we have a cast from Todd Browning’s ‘Freaks.’ Strictly Republic
\nStudios, but great entertainment. He Is Risen!”<\/P>
\n

The reader signs himself “The Baptist John” to distinguish himself no doubt from the Bible
\nguy.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A friend asked (this is true): “How’s the blogging life?” My reply: “Underpaid and overrated.” The overraters tend to be johnnys-come-lately who believe they’ve had a revelation when, in fact, all they’ve done is plugged in. The underpayers are everyone else — in other words, the readers. The truth is that, like much else on […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-605","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-9L","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=605"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/605\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}