{"id":536,"date":"2004-01-29T10:41:07","date_gmt":"2004-01-29T18:41:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/01\/they_call_this_fair_play\/"},"modified":"2004-01-29T10:41:07","modified_gmt":"2004-01-29T18:41:07","slug":"they_call_this_fair_play","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/01\/they_call_this_fair_play.html","title":{"rendered":"THEY CALL THIS FAIR PLAY"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>CBS won&#8217;t budge. More than 340,000 emails and phone calls <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20040118.shtml#67290\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>since Friday<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> have had no effect.&nbsp;The network<br \/>\nis&nbsp;still refusing to run moveon.org&#8217;s 30-second ad &#8220;Child&#8217;s Pay&#8221; during the Super Bowl on<br \/>\nSunday.&nbsp;Yet it&#8217;s&nbsp;&#8220;allowing the Bush White House to run an advocacy ad of its own,&#8221;<br \/>\nmoveon.org says. Apparently that&#8217;s the CBS version of fair play.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><A href=\"http:\/\/www.moveon.org\/cbs\/ad\"><IMG height=80\nsrc=\"http:\/\/anon.moveon.speedera.net\/images\/cbs-button-long.gif\" width=144\nborder=0><\/A><\/P><br \/>\n<P>&#8220;The First Amendment doesn&#8217;t mean a whole lot&#8221; when CBS flouts its &#8220;constitutional<br \/>\nobligation to air opposing points of view,&#8221; Moveon.org adds.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Meantime,&nbsp;CBS is charging an average of <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/01\/29\/business\/29adcol.html\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>$2.3 million for 30-second Super Bowl spots<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>. Who&#8217;s<br \/>\npaying for the privilege? The usual suspects: Budweiser, FedEx, General Motors, I.B.M., Procter<br \/>\n&#038; Gamble, Pepsico, Walt Disney, Sony Pictures, Lay&#8217;s potato chips, Cialis and Levitra<br \/>\nerectile-dysfunction drugs.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Full disclosure: We didn&#8217;t call CBS for comment. We&#8217;re playing by its rules. And doncha just<br \/>\nlove <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A58609-2004Jan28.html\"><B><EM><F\nONT color=#003399>this photo<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>? (Enlarge it!)<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>Postscript:<\/STRONG>&nbsp;A reader&nbsp;wants to<br \/>\nknow,&nbsp;Is&nbsp;CBS&nbsp;really flouting&nbsp;its constitutional obligation or merely<br \/>\nacting within its right&nbsp;to air what it wants?&nbsp;Good question. I&nbsp;doubt<br \/>\nthat&nbsp;CBS is&nbsp;violating the letter of the law, or its&nbsp;legal advisers aren&#8217;t worth a<br \/>\ndime. But I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s certainly violating the spirit of the law.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CBS won&#8217;t budge. More than 340,000 emails and phone calls since Friday have had no effect.&nbsp;The network is&nbsp;still refusing to run moveon.org&#8217;s 30-second ad &#8220;Child&#8217;s Pay&#8221; during the Super Bowl on Sunday.&nbsp;Yet it&#8217;s&nbsp;&#8220;allowing the Bush White House to run an advocacy ad of its own,&#8221; moveon.org says. Apparently that&#8217;s the CBS version of fair play. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-536","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-8E","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/536\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}