{"id":514,"date":"2004-02-08T12:11:03","date_gmt":"2004-02-08T20:11:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2004\/02\/a_truly_lousy_interview\/"},"modified":"2004-02-08T12:11:03","modified_gmt":"2004-02-08T20:11:03","slug":"a_truly_lousy_interview","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2004\/02\/a_truly_lousy_interview.html","title":{"rendered":"A TRULY LOUSY INTERVIEW"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>This morning&#8217;s &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; on NBC should have been called &#8220;Meet the President.&#8221; If<br \/>\nonly Tim Russert had said: &#8220;Yes, Mr. President, but you didn&#8217;t answer the question.&#8221; The first<br \/>\nexchange&nbsp;set the tone for all the rest:<\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><STRONG>Russert:<\/STRONG> On Friday, you announced a committee,<br \/>\ncommission to look into intelligence failures regarding the Iraq war and our entire intelligence<br \/>\ncommunity. You have been reluctant to do that for some time. Why?<br \/>\n<P><STRONG>President Bush:<\/STRONG> Well, first let me kind of step back and talk about<br \/>\nintelligence in general, if I might. Intelligence is a vital part of fighting and winning the war against<br \/>\nthe terrorists. It is because the war against terrorists is a war against individuals who hide in caves<br \/>\nin remote parts of the world, individuals who have these kind of shadowy networks, individuals<br \/>\nwho deal with rogue nations. So, we need a good intelligence system. We need really good<br \/>\nintelligence.<\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>The answer went on at more than twice that length but never got around to addressing the<br \/>\nactual question. <A href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/4179618\/\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>Read the transcript.<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>&nbsp;Similarly, other canned<br \/>\nreplies begged the questions and went on and on at length but with so few specifics and so little<br \/>\nvariation they should have come stamped with a generic product label: &#8220;Oval Office house<br \/>\nbrand.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Some peculiar answers were simply the testimony of a confused mind, all claims to the<br \/>\ncontrary notwithstanding.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><STRONG>Russert: <\/STRONG>But can you launch a preemptive war<br \/>\nwithout iron clad, absolute intelligence that he had weapons of mass destruction?<br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=textBodyBlack><B><STRONG>President Bush: <\/STRONG><\/B>Let me take a step<br \/>\nback for a second and&nbsp;there is no such thing necessarily in a dictatorial regime of iron-clad<br \/>\nabsolutely solid evidence.&nbsp; The evidence I had was the best possible evidence that he had a<br \/>\nweapon.<\/P><br \/>\n<P class=textBodyBlack><B><STRONG>Russert: <\/STRONG><\/B>But it may have been<br \/>\nwrong.<\/P><br \/>\n<P class=textBodyBlack><B><STRONG>President Bush: <\/STRONG><\/B>Well, but what<br \/>\nwasn&#8217;t wrong was the fact that he had the ability to make a weapon.&nbsp;That wasn&#8217;t<br \/>\nright.<\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=textBodyBlack>Huh? Let&#8217;s just call it the war context of no context, which&nbsp;our<br \/>\nMaximum Leader&nbsp;kept insisting on. He cocked his head like a bantam rooster and moved<br \/>\nhis lips like a sock puppet. This is considered &#8220;presidential&#8221;? <\/P><br \/>\n<P class=textBodyBlack>Equally rotten, the news media&nbsp;are <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2004\/US\/02\/08\/sprj.nirq.bush\/index.html\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>treating the interview as news<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>&nbsp;instead<br \/>\nof&nbsp;<A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.safesearching.com\/billmaher\/video\/01-30-04.ram\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>the joke it in fact is<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>. This pretense &#8212; that the<br \/>\npresident actually said something of value &#8212; is one more confirmation that the United States is<br \/>\nbeing turned into a Banana Republic.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><B>Postscript:<\/B> Glad to see <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.opinionjournal.com\/columnists\/pnoonan\/\"><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399><B>Peggy Noonan&#8217;s commentary<\/B>:<\/FONT><\/EM> <\/A>&#8220;The president<br \/>\nseemed tired, unsure and often bumbling. His answers were repetitive, and when he tried to clarify<br \/>\nthem he tended to make them worse. He did not seem prepared. He seemed in some way<br \/>\ndisconnected from the event.&#8221; She also noticed something very important about the transcript of<br \/>\nthe interview: &#8220;It reads better than it played.&#8221; I was struck by that myself. The transcript almost<br \/>\nmakes him seem coherent.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>It&#8217;s also nice to see that somebody besides me thought Tim Russert did a lousy job. Here&#8217;s <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/thenation.com\/capitalgames\/index.mhtml?bid=3&#038;pid=1245\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>David Corn<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> in The Nation: &#8220;In his Oval Office,<br \/>\nhour-long session with Bush, he repeatedly let Bush slide or elide. The few tough queries<br \/>\nproduced the predictable replies from Bush. And then Russert did not come back with the obvious<br \/>\nfollow-ups. &#8230; Instead, Russert allowed Bush to dish out the all-too familiar, White<br \/>\nHouse-approved rhetoric. It pains me to say, he was more enabler than interrogator.&#8221;<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This morning&#8217;s &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; on NBC should have been called &#8220;Meet the President.&#8221; If only Tim Russert had said: &#8220;Yes, Mr. President, but you didn&#8217;t answer the question.&#8221; The first exchange&nbsp;set the tone for all the rest: Russert: On Friday, you announced a committee, commission to look into intelligence failures regarding the Iraq war [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-514","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-8i","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=514"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/514\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}