{"id":444,"date":"2003-11-05T11:56:54","date_gmt":"2003-11-05T19:56:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2003\/11\/walmart_101\/"},"modified":"2003-11-05T11:56:54","modified_gmt":"2003-11-05T19:56:54","slug":"walmart_101","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2003\/11\/walmart_101.html","title":{"rendered":"WAL-MART 101"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>The last time I looked, way back in May in another life, the question about Wal-Mart was:<br \/>\nSmall-town savior or company gulag? At least that&#8217;s the way I put it. Even the <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20031102.shtml#58729\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>increasingly irritating David Brooks<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> got off a funny<br \/>\nsatire about Wal-Mart&#8217;s lad-magazine ban, &#8220;No Sex Magazines, Please, We&#8217;re Wal-Mart<br \/>\nShoppers,&#8221; although it was, in fact, about the shibboleths of liberal, not<br \/>\nconservative,&nbsp;culture.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>For instance, he teed off beautifully on the social consciousness of Trader Joe&#8217;s, &#8220;the grocery<br \/>\nstore for people who wouldn&#8217;t dream of buying free-range chicken broth from a company that<br \/>\ndidn&#8217;t take a position against offshore oil drilling.&#8221; But, as might have been expected, Brooks was<br \/>\nunfailingly awed by Wal-Mart&#8217;s reputation as &#8220;patriotic, community oriented, family-centered,<br \/>\nrural and religious&#8221; &#8212; and he never once mentioned Wal-Mart&#8217;s spotty record as an<br \/>\nemployer.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Now that <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/11\/05\/national\/05WALM.html?hp\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>Wal-Mart is front-page news again<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> following a recent<br \/>\nnationwide raid on 60 of its stores &#8212; federal agents arrested hundreds of illegal <BR>immigrants<br \/>\nworking as low-paid, night janitors &#8220;forced to work seven days a week&#8221; with no time off, no<br \/>\novertime pay, no workers&#8217; compensation, no health insurance or any other protections &#8212; maybe<br \/>\nBrooks will take another crack at Wal-Mart, only this time with awe for its hypocrisy. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Is it too much to ask the nation&#8217;s (and the world&#8217;s) largest retailer to treat its workers<br \/>\ndecently, let alone obey the law? Wal-Mart has been dogged for a long time by <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.walmartwatch.com\/know\/commentary.cfm?subsection_id=105\"><B><EM><F\nONT color=#003399>stories about shabby treatment of employees<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>. I<br \/>\nreceived hundreds of e-mails from people who worked for Wal-Mart. The main complaints were<br \/>\nthat it discriminated against women employees in compensation and promotion, cheated<br \/>\nemployees out of fully earned wages and violated the rights of disabled people in its hiring<br \/>\npractices.<BR><BR>Trusting soul that I am, I believed them. But just to be sure they were<br \/>\ntelling the truth, I went looking for documented evidence of such claims. It was easy to find. One<br \/>\n2001 class-action lawsuit brought in New York state on behalf of 80,000 employees charged that<br \/>\nWal-Mart systematically avoided paying them earned overtime wages. Similar cases were pending<br \/>\nin other states. A report from The New York Times of Feb. 16, 2003, detailed a lawsuit that<br \/>\ncould become &#8220;the largest employment discrimination class action in American history.&#8221; It alleged<br \/>\ndiscrimination against female Wal-Mart employees, claiming they are paid lower wages than men<br \/>\nand consistently passed over for promotion. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>&#8220;More than 40 lawsuits are pending that accuse Wal-Mart of pressuring or forcing employees<br \/>\nto work unpaid hours off the clock,&#8221; the report noted. Wal-Mart officials derided all these<br \/>\nlawsuits, of course, though a jury in Oregon found Wal-Mart guilty of forcing 400 employees to<br \/>\nwork off the clock. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Similarly, Wal-Mart officials deride the latest allegations. They deny knowing that illegal<br \/>\nimmigrants worked at their stores because the janitors who were arrested had been outsourced,<br \/>\nthat is, hired by subcontractors. Two previous roundups, in 1998 and 2001, appear to have<br \/>\nescaped their memories. Wal-Mart and its subcontractors also seem to have forgotten to pay taxes<br \/>\nfor these workers. But I&#8217;d bet Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott didn&#8217;t forget to collect every penny of the<br \/>\n<A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.walmartworkerscanada.com\/news.php?articleID=00030\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>more than $18 million<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> he was paid in 2002.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The last time I looked, way back in May in another life, the question about Wal-Mart was: Small-town savior or company gulag? At least that&#8217;s the way I put it. Even the increasingly irritating David Brooks got off a funny satire about Wal-Mart&#8217;s lad-magazine ban, &#8220;No Sex Magazines, Please, We&#8217;re Wal-Mart Shoppers,&#8221; although it was, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-444","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-7a","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/444\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}