{"id":434,"date":"2003-10-29T12:04:28","date_gmt":"2003-10-29T20:04:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2003\/10\/ring_around_the_rose_garden\/"},"modified":"2003-10-29T12:04:28","modified_gmt":"2003-10-29T20:04:28","slug":"ring_around_the_rose_garden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2003\/10\/ring_around_the_rose_garden.html","title":{"rendered":"RING AROUND THE ROSE GARDEN"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Does the president know what the meaning of &#8220;is&#8221; is? I&#8217;m not talking about Slick Willie. I<br \/>\nmean Gee Dubya Shrub, whose evasions &#8212; a mixture of half-lies and outright lies &#8212; were on<br \/>\ndisplay again yesterday in his Rose Garden press conference. (Here&#8217;s the <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A29127-2003Oct28.html\"><B><EM><F\nONT color=#003399>entire transcript<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>.) <\/P><br \/>\n<P><A href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/10\/29\/politics\/29BANN.html\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>His attempt to blame the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln<br \/>\nsailors<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> for the &#8220;Mission Accomplished&#8221; banner, a White House<br \/>\ncreation that provided the TV backdrop for his triumphal May 1 speech declaring victory in Iraq<br \/>\n&#8212; oops, the end of major combat operations &#8212; is only the most laughable and makes him sound<br \/>\nlike one of those French weasels his minions used to blame for not supporting him. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Here are some equally ludicrous&nbsp;statements&nbsp;from his press conference.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>QUESTION:<\/STRONG> <I>Will you acknowledge now that you were<br \/>\npremature in making those remarks [about the end&nbsp;of combat]?<\/I><br \/>\n<BR><STRONG>ANSWER:<\/STRONG> <I>I think you ought to look at my speech. I said<br \/>\nIraq&#8217;s a dangerous place, got hard work to do, there&#8217;s still more to be done. &#8230; But my statement<br \/>\nwas a clear statement, basically recognizing that this phase of the war for Iraq was over, and there<br \/>\nwas a lot of dangerous work. And it&#8217;s proved to be right. It is dangerous in Iraq.<\/I><\/P><br \/>\n<P>If anybody asks him, he&#8217;ll also predict that the sun will set this evening.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>Q:<\/STRONG> <I>If there are foreign terrorists involved, why aren&#8217;t Syria and<br \/>\nIran being held accountable?<\/I> <BR><STRONG>A:<\/STRONG> <I>Yes, well, we&#8217;re working<br \/>\nclosely with those countries to let them know that we expect them to enforce borders, prevent<br \/>\npeople from coming across borders if, in fact, we catch them doing that.<\/I><\/P><br \/>\n<P>It wasn&#8217;t enough to say we&#8217;d let them know. He had to let us know, in typical pol&#8217;s jargon<br \/>\n&#8220;we&#8217;re working closely with them.&#8221; I&#8217;d bet that collaboration is news to Syria and<br \/>\nIran.&nbsp;As&nbsp;revealed today, in fact, <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=E4RFWYOCRTHD4CRBAEKSFEY\n?type=topNews&#038;storyID=3713945\"><B><EM><FONT color=#003399>Iran won&#8217;t&nbsp;share<br \/>\nAl Qaeda intelligence with the U.S. government<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> and pooh-poohed<br \/>\ncharges that terrorists were slipping into Iraq across its borders. &#8220;We don&#8217;t have any relations with<br \/>\nAmerican security services so there is no reason to do anything on this issue,&#8221; an Iranian<br \/>\nspokesman said. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Will someone on the White House staff please inform the president, since he doesn&#8217;t read the<br \/>\nnews?<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>Q:<\/STRONG> <I>In recent weeks, you and your White House team have<br \/>\nmade a concerted effort to put a positive spin on progress in Iraq.<\/I> [The reporter then referred<br \/>\nto Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld&#8217;s leaked &#8220;slog&#8221; memo casting doubt on the progress.]<br \/>\n<EM>And people out there don&#8217;t believe that the administration is leveling with them about the<br \/>\ndifficulty and scope of the problem in Iraq.<\/EM><BR><STRONG>A:<\/STRONG> <I>I can&#8217;t<br \/>\nput it more plainly; Iraq is a dangerous place. That&#8217;s leveling. It is a dangerous place.<\/I><\/P><br \/>\n<P>If that&#8217;s leveling, the Flat Earth Society has a place reserved for him.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>Q:<\/STRONG> <I>Are you considering the possibility of possibly adding more<br \/>\nU.S. troops to the forces already on the ground there to help restore<br \/>\norder?<\/I><BR><STRONG>A:<\/STRONG> <I>Yeah, that&#8217;s a decision by John Abizaid. He<br \/>\nmakes that &#8212; General Abizaid makes the decision as to whether he needs more troops.<br \/>\n&#8230;<\/I><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Will someone on the White House staff please remind the president he is the<br \/>\ncommander-in-chief?&nbsp;Recently he made sure to tell the press that he was, so it could spread<br \/>\nthe word to us, but it seems he&#8217;s forgotten.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>To another question asking &#8220;Can you promise a year from now that you will have reduced the<br \/>\nnumber of troops in Iraq,&#8221; he replied that it was &#8220;a trick question, so I won&#8217;t answer it.&#8221; I say a<br \/>\ntrick question deserves at least a trick answer. Or something like the statement he made on<br \/>\nMonday that the increased violence in Iraq was a sign of progress. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>As one commentary noted: <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/10\/29\/politics\/29ASSE.html\"><B><EM><FONT\ncolor=#003399>&#8220;That formulation left even some Republicans<br \/>\nwincing.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> Considering the <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=E4RFWYOCRTHD4CRBAEKSFEY\n?type=topNews&#038;storyID=3713643\"><B><EM><FONT color=#003399>new death-toll<br \/>\nmilestone reached today in Iraq<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A>, they should be doing more than<br \/>\nthat.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Half of the Arab world is laughing at the upside-down notion that the attacks are the result of<br \/>\nU.S. success just as we used to laugh at Iraqi propaganda. &#8220;<A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/10\/29\/international\/middleeast\/29ARAB.html\"><B><EM><\nFONT color=#003399>Remember how Saddam Hussein talked<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A> about<br \/>\nwinning the mother of all battles?&#8221; Muhsen Awaji, a Saudi Islamist lawyer, told a New York<br \/>\nTimes reporter. &#8220;It is the same disease.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG>POSTSCRIPT:<\/STRONG> As if to prove parallel universes do exist, here&#8217;s a<br \/>\nLos Angeles Times reporter&#8217;s take on the press conference: <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/custom\/showcase\/la-na-bushstyle29oct29.story\"><B><EM><br \/>\n<FONT color=#003399>Jocular Bush Keeps It Light for Most<br \/>\nPart<\/FONT><\/EM><\/B><\/A><EM><FONT color=#003399>.<\/FONT><\/EM><\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Does the president know what the meaning of &#8220;is&#8221; is? I&#8217;m not talking about Slick Willie. I mean Gee Dubya Shrub, whose evasions &#8212; a mixture of half-lies and outright lies &#8212; were on display again yesterday in his Rose Garden press conference. (Here&#8217;s the entire transcript.) His attempt to blame the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-434","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-70","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}