{"id":372,"date":"2003-09-24T11:31:00","date_gmt":"2003-09-24T18:31:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2003\/09\/dr_pangloss_and_the_iron_fist\/"},"modified":"2003-09-24T11:31:00","modified_gmt":"2003-09-24T18:31:00","slug":"dr_pangloss_and_the_iron_fist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2003\/09\/dr_pangloss_and_the_iron_fist.html","title":{"rendered":"DR. PANGLOSS AND  THE IRON FIST"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Now I get it. George W. Bush had a secret speech writer to help him with yesterday&#8217;s address to the U.N. &#8212; none other than the infallible, ineffable Dr. Pangloss. The New York Times suggested as much this morning in its <A href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/09\/24\/opinion\/24WED1.html\"><STRONG><EM><FONT color=#003399>lead editorial<\/FONT><\/EM><\/STRONG><\/A>, describing&nbsp;the address&nbsp;on the surface at least as &#8220;a Panglossian report on how&nbsp;well things were going in Iraq.&#8221; <EM>(Free registration required.)<\/EM><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Anybody mildly familiar with 18th-century French literature knows that after Candide&#8217;s tutor Dr. Pangloss is left for dead &nbsp;&#8212; having been whipped, hanged and dissected &#8212; he still believes in the chief tenet of his philosophy: &#8220;Everything in this world happens for the best.&#8221; Which is pretty much what Bush wants us to believe. Taking us for Candide stand-ins, he aimed his address &#8220;more at a domestic audience than the world community,&#8221; as the Times editorial put it, &#8220;given how sunny a picture he painted of a situation in which the administration is finding almost nothing as easy as it had hoped.&#8221; <\/P><br \/>\n<P>In my quick take yesterday on <A href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives20030921.shtml#53410\"><STRONG><EM><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;Shrub&#8217;s Folly,&#8221;<\/FONT><\/EM><\/STRONG><\/A> I noted how much time he spent on the subject of sex slavery, a subject we hadn&#8217;t much heard about from him before. Here&#8217;s <A\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2003\/09\/24\/international\/24SEX.html\"><STRONG><EM><FONT color=#003399>why he did it:<\/FONT><\/EM><\/STRONG><\/A>&nbsp; &#8220;By elevating an effort to halt human trafficking to near the top of his agenda &#8230;&nbsp;President Bush&nbsp;was trying to put a softer face on American foreign policy and emphasize his stance to a domestic coalition that includes the religious right, his advisers and other said.&#8221; <EM>(Free registration<br \/>\nrequired.)<\/EM><\/P><br \/>\n<P>It&#8217;s commendable of him, don&#8217;t you think? Christian organizations and conservative human rights advocates have long focused on the issue, as have liberals and feminists. Maybe with his new-found focus on the international trade in sex slavery, President Bush can bring democracy to Iraq, solve the problems of the Middle East, disarm North Korea,&nbsp;catch Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, find more jobs, turn around the U.S. economy, neutralize his political<br \/>\nopposition at home and win a second term. Failing that, he can always take up &#8220;cultivating his garden,&#8221;&nbsp;where Dr. Pangloss left off.<\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now I get it. George W. Bush had a secret speech writer to help him with yesterday&#8217;s address to the U.N. &#8212; none other than the infallible, ineffable Dr. Pangloss. The New York Times suggested as much this morning in its lead editorial, describing&nbsp;the address&nbsp;on the surface at least as &#8220;a Panglossian report on how&nbsp;well [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-372","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-60","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}