{"id":1861,"date":"2011-05-08T09:42:26","date_gmt":"2011-05-08T16:42:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2011\/05\/not_ready_for_his_close-up\/"},"modified":"2011-05-08T09:42:26","modified_gmt":"2011-05-08T16:42:26","slug":"not_ready_for_his_close-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2011\/05\/not_ready_for_his_close-up.html","title":{"rendered":"NYT: Bin Laden Not Ready for His Close-Up"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Isn&#8217;t editorializing in a news story supposed to be out of bounds at <em>The New York Times?<\/em> Here&#8217;s the third graf of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/05\/08\/world\/asia\/08binladen.html?_r=1&#038;ref=global-home&#038;pagewanted=all\">Bin Laden&#8217;s Secret Life in a Diminished World<\/a>, which (with a headline describing his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/images\/2011\/05\/08\/nytfrontpage\/scan.jpg\">Shrunken<\/strong> World<\/a>) dominates the print edition of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/images\/2011\/05\/08\/nytfrontpage\/scan.jpg\">today&#8217;s front page<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Videos seized from Bin Laden&#8217;s compound and released by the Obama administration on Saturday showed him wrapped in an old blanket watching himself on TV, <strong><em>like an aging actor imagining a comeback<\/em><\/strong> [emphasis added]. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>You&#8217;d think a news editor would have killed the offending phrase. But you&#8217;d be wrong. It would have been very easy to do, and it would not have subtracted an iota of fact.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Videos seized from Bin Laden&#8217;s compound and released by the Obama administration on Saturday showed him wrapped in an old blanket watching himself on TV. <strike>like an aging actor imagining a comeback<\/strike>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>See how simple that was? And how much better it reads?<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nWe&#8217;re also told in the same paragraph, &#8220;A senior intelligence official said other videos showed him practicing and <em><strong>flubbing his lines<\/strong><\/em> in front of a camera.&#8221;<br \/>\nHow does the NYT know that this kinda sorta aging actor imagining a comeback flubbed his lines? Well, because the intelligence official said so. And we know American senior intelligence officials can be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0511\/54162.html#ixzz1LIXRsv75\">depended upon to tell the truth<\/a>.<br \/>\nBut, hey, the three reporters who wrote the story had no choice. They had to depend on that official because he heard the tapes, and they didn&#8217;t. As we learn in the 18th paragraph (in a <em>by-the-way<\/em> aside, no less), all the videos released by the White House &#8220;were provided without sound.&#8221; You read that right.<br \/>\nFor all I know, the videos really do show what the unnamed intelligence official says. It&#8217;s worth noting, however &#8212; as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/05\/08\/world\/asia\/08intel.html?ref=world\">a more forthright story<\/a> on page 10 of the NYT print edition points out &#8212; the White House released the videos not just &#8220;to promote an intelligence triumph but also to try to further diminish the legacy and appeal of Bin Laden.&#8221;<br \/>\nAnd belittling remarks inserted into a front-page news story where they don&#8217;t belong will certainly help. Robert Fisk&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/opinion\/commentators\/fisk\/robert-fisk-the-alqaida-leader-knew-he-was-a-failure-now-us-has-turned-him-into-martyr-2279180.html\">column tells the tale<\/a> as it should be told:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Bin Laden got his just deserts &#8212; those who live by the sword tend to die by the sword &#8212; but did he get the &#8220;justice&#8221; that President Obama talked about? Many Arabs &#8212; and this theme was taken up by the Arab press, which spoke of his &#8220;execution&#8221; &#8212; thought he should have been captured, taken to the international court in The Hague and tried.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>He makes no bones about Bin Laden&#8217;s diminished status. &#8220;[N]eedless to say, he was a has-been,&#8221; Fisk writes. But remember, he&#8217;s voicing an <em>opinion<\/em>. And besides, &#8220;the real problem,&#8221; as he puts it,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>is that the West, which has constantly preached to the Arab world that legality and non-violence was the way forward in the Middle East, has taught a different lesson to the people of the region: that executing your opponents is perfectly acceptable.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Postscript:<\/strong> And now &#8230; the feature flick: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=DB0ftf53JYs\">video of a has-been<\/a>. Here are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2011\/05\/07\/world\/asia\/20110507-binladen-videos.html\">all five<\/a>.<br \/>\n<strong>PPS:<\/strong> May  9 &#8212; The phrase &#8220;like an aging actor imagining a comeback&#8221; appears to have gained traction. It was used this morning by NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Today&#8221; show to describe the video of Bin Laden watching himself on the tube. Why am I not surprised?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Isn&#8217;t editorializing in a news story supposed to be out of bounds at The New York Times? Here&#8217;s the third graf of Bin Laden&#8217;s Secret Life in a Diminished World, which (with a headline describing his Shrunken World) dominates the print edition of today&#8217;s front page: Videos seized from Bin Laden&#8217;s compound and released by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1861","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-u1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1861"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1861\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}