{"id":1650,"date":"2008-06-13T13:49:25","date_gmt":"2008-06-13T20:49:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2008\/06\/you_be_the_judge\/"},"modified":"2008-06-13T13:49:25","modified_gmt":"2008-06-13T20:49:25","slug":"you_be_the_judge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2008\/06\/you_be_the_judge.html","title":{"rendered":"You Be the Judge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which lede do you like?<br \/>\n<strong>1.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB121327909961067937.html?mod=todays_us_page_one\">Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Supreme Court ruled that foreign prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay may challenge their detention before a federal judge, a historic decision that rebuffs the Bush administration&#8217;s years-long effort to curtail the legal rights of terrorism suspects.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>2.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/06\/13\/washington\/13scotus.html?_r=1&#038;ref=todayspaper&#038;oref=slogin\">Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered its third consecutive rebuff to the Bush administration&#8217;s handling of the detainees at Guant\u00e1namo Bay, ruling 5 to 4 that the prisoners there have a constitutional right to go to federal court to challenge their continued detention.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>3.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/06\/12\/AR2008061201695.html\">Robert Barnes in The Washington Post:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A deeply divided Supreme Court yesterday ruled that terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay have a right to seek their release in federal court, delivering a historic rebuke to the Bush administration and Congress for policies that the majority said compromised, in the name of national security, the Constitution&#8217;s guarantee of liberty.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>4.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/printedition\/front\/la-na-scotus13-2008jun13,0,3585112.story\">David Savage in the Los Angeles Times:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected for the third time President Bush&#8217;s policy of holding foreign prisoners under exclusive control of the military at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, ruling that the men have a right to seek their freedom before a federal judge.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I like <strong>1<\/strong> and <strong>4<\/strong>. <em>(Oops, I meant  <strong>1<\/strong> and <strong>3<\/strong>.)<\/em><br \/>\nBut Keith Olbermann offered the <em>pi&#232;ce de r&#233;sistance<\/em>, namely Jonathan Turley, on &#8220;Countdown&#8221;:<br \/>\n<center><iframe loading=\"lazy\" height=\"339\" width=\"425\" src=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/22425001\/vp\/25130375#25130375\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/center><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which lede do you like? 1. Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal: The Supreme Court ruled that foreign prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay may challenge their detention before a federal judge, a historic decision that rebuffs the Bush administration&#8217;s years-long effort to curtail the legal rights of terrorism suspects. 2. Linda Greenhouse in The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1650","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-qC","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1650\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}