{"id":1619,"date":"2008-01-10T09:45:59","date_gmt":"2008-01-10T17:45:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2008\/01\/uh_just_asking\/"},"modified":"2008-01-10T09:45:59","modified_gmt":"2008-01-10T17:45:59","slug":"uh_just_asking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2008\/01\/uh_just_asking.html","title":{"rendered":"Uh, Just Asking"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Does it matter to the pols running for prez? Does it matter to the people voting for the pols? Let&#8217;s see whether the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rferl.org\/featuresarticle\/2008\/01\/B8ED0DBA-62A6-4782-866E-6DD5317B5163.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>latest estimate<\/strong><\/font><\/a> of the civilian death toll in Iraq makes the agenda.<br \/>\nDoubtful. Why should it?  It&#8217;s old news. It&#8217;s all about the first three years of the war. We&#8217;re well past that. We&#8217;re going on &#8230; what? &#8230; five years?<br \/>\nBesides, the number of the dead &#8212; 151,000 between 2003 and 2006, according to the World Health Organization &#8212; doesn&#8217;t even come close to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/10\/10\/AR2006101001442.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>655,000<\/strong><\/font><\/a> estimated earlier by researchers from Johns Hopkins.<br \/>\nYes, the numbers are all over the lot, depending on the source and methodology. Here&#8217;s a count of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iraqbodycount.org\/database\/\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>documented deaths<\/strong><\/font><\/a> based on actual reports, not on estimates. As of today, it&#8217;s <i>only<\/i> 80,419 to 87,834. Ahhh &#8230; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives\/2007\/10\/are_we_still_co.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>whatever<\/strong><\/font><\/a>.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/jan-herman\/uh-just-asking_b_80944.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>(Crossposted at HuffPo)<\/strong><\/font><\/a><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/graphics8.nytimes.com\/images\/2008\/01\/12\/magazine\/13wwln-lede.graphic.300.539.jpg\" class=inline target=new\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt title=\"WHAT COUNTS [Source: CNN Research Poll. Chart by Charles M. Blow. Via NYT]\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/What%20Counts%20190.jpg\" width=190 align=right border=0 \/><\/a><strong>Postscript:<\/strong> Jan. 13 &#8212; Here&#8217;s the lede in Noah Feldman&#8217;s article this morning, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/01\/13\/magazine\/13wwln-lede-t.html?_r=1&#038;ref=magazine&#038;oref=slogin\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>&#8220;Vanishing Act,&#8221;<\/strong><\/font><\/a> in the Sunday NYT magazine:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What if the United States were at war during a presidential election &#8212; and none of the candidates wanted to talk about it? Iraq has become the great disappearing issue of the early primary season, and if nothing fundamental changes on the ground there &#8212; a probable result of current policy &#8212; the war may disappear even more completely in the new year.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I don&#8217;t agree with Feldman&#8217;s general posture on Iraq war policy or with his analysis, which strike me as compromised by his establishmentarian point of view. But I like what he&#8217;s getting at, as shown by the <a href=\"http:\/\/graphics8.nytimes.com\/images\/2008\/01\/12\/magazine\/13wwln-lede.graphic.300.539.jpg\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>chart<\/strong><\/font><\/a> that accompanies his article. And while I don&#8217;t like what the chart shows, I like the fact that it answers some of what I asked.<br \/>\nI also appreciate his reference to the Tommy Lee Jones flick <a href=\"http:\/\/wip.warnerbros.com\/inthevalleyofelah\/\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>&#8220;In the Valley of Elah.&#8221;<\/strong><\/font><\/a> I thought it was the best movie of 2007. As Feldman indicates, it was ignored by moviegoers. Worse, in my opinion, it was shunned by the critics. I kept looking for it on their &#8220;10 best&#8221; lists. Couldn&#8217;t find it.<br \/>\nIt was not among the picks of the <a href=\"http:\/\/davekehr.com\/?p=280\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>National Society of Film Critics<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.afi.com\/tvevents\/afiawards07\/default.aspx\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>American Film Institute<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nyfcc.com\/awards.php?year=2007\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>New York Film Critics Circle<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lafca.net\/news.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>Los Angeles Film Critics Assoc.<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, or the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagofilmcritics.org\/index.php?\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>Chicago Film Critics Assoc.<\/strong><\/font><\/a> It did not make <a href=\"http:\/\/rogerebert.suntimes.com\/apps\/pbcs.dll\/article?AID=\/20071220\/COMMENTARY\/176124809\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>Roger Ebert&#8217;s list<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, Village Voice critic <a href=\"http:\/\/www.villagevoice.com\/film\/0801,hoberman,78740,20.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>J. Hoberman&#8217;s list<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, or Newsweek critic <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/id\/80798\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>David Ansen&#8217;s list<\/strong><\/font><\/a>. And it was ignored by all three NY Times critics, failing to make <a href=\"http:\/\/movies.nytimes.com\/gst\/movies\/critics_picks.html?st=sc&#038;critic=Manohla%20Dargis\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>Manohla Dargis&#8217;s list<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/movies.nytimes.com\/gst\/movies\/critics_picks.html?st=sc&#038;critic=A.%20O.%20Scott\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>A.O. Scott&#8217;s list<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, or <a href=\"http:\/\/movies.nytimes.com\/gst\/movies\/critics_picks.html?st=sc&#038;critic=Stephen%20Holden\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>Stephen Holden&#8217;s list<\/strong><\/font><\/a>.<br \/>\nOh yeah &#8230; it did make Time critic <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/specials\/2007\/top10\/article\/0,30583,1686204_1686244_1692273,00.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>   Richard Schickel&#8217;s list<\/strong><\/font><\/a> and his colleague <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/specials\/2007\/top10\/article\/0,30583,1686204_1686244_1692016,00.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>Richard Corliss&#8217;s list<\/strong><\/font><\/a>. They both ranked it No. 8,  which I have to say is like pinning the tail on the donkey.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Does it matter to the pols running for prez? Does it matter to the people voting for the pols? Let&#8217;s see whether the 655,000 estimated earlier by researchers from Johns Hopkins. Yes, the numbers are all over the lot, depending on the source and methodology. Here&#8217;s a count of whatever.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1619","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-q7","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1619"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1619\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}