{"id":1555,"date":"2007-03-18T10:41:33","date_gmt":"2007-03-18T17:41:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2007\/03\/lessons_four_years_after_what\/"},"modified":"2007-03-18T10:41:33","modified_gmt":"2007-03-18T17:41:33","slug":"lessons_four_years_after_what","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2007\/03\/lessons_four_years_after_what.html","title":{"rendered":"Lessons Four Years After? What Lessons?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A friend who deals in matters of national security writes: &#8220;All the major newspapers seem to have a common, inexplicable blind spot in discussing the war in Iraq, which I find very disturbing because it obfuscates the fundamental failures, their nature, and their cause.&#8221;\u00a0The most recent example is today&#8217;s editorial, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/03\/17\/AR2007031700950.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>&#8220;Lessons of War,&#8221;<\/strong><\/font><\/a> in The Washington Post:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Clearly we were insufficiently skeptical of intelligence reports. It would almost be comforting if Mr. Bush had &#8220;lied the nation into war,&#8221; as is frequently charged. The best postwar journalism instead suggests that the president and his administration exaggerated, cherry-picked and simplified <strong>but fundamentally believed &#8212; as did the CIA &#8212; the catastrophically wrong case that then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell presented to the United Nations<\/strong> [emphasis added].<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In fact, &#8220;many high-level, very experienced career\u00a0CIA people not only did not believe the stuff, but knew it was wrong,&#8221; my correspondent notes.\u00a0&#8220;The same is true at State and the Pentagon.\u00a0The believers were the political appointees &#8212; the agency or department\u00a0bosses and therefore their unimpeachable mouthpieces, the bosses&#8217;\u00a0immediate staffs, and the upward-bound opportunists.\u00a0Why should <strong>but fundamentally believed<\/strong> even be in the sentence?\u00a0The core failure at CIA, State, and Defense is that the facts were side-tracked and those who knew them and would\u00a0speak them\u00a0were muzzled.&#8221;<br \/>\nAmen, brother.<br \/>\n<strong>Postscript:<\/strong> Furthermore, &#8220;take Powell&#8217;s function as a mouthpiece:  An Army four star who does not even suspect that the &#8216;mobile bio-weapons labs&#8217; might be just hydrogen generators for inflating artillery weather balloons &#8212; if anything at all? Even though our own Army has them?  Even when the intelligence source is Curveball and only Curveball &#8212; whom the CIA knew at the time to be a fabricator? I often wonder whether the editors read their own papers.&#8221;<br \/>\nWorse, do the editors read their own papers and either 1) not care or 2) choose, for any number of reasons, to act as mouthpieces themselves?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A friend who deals in matters of national security writes: &#8220;All the major newspapers seem to have a common, inexplicable blind spot in discussing the war in Iraq, which I find very disturbing because it obfuscates the fundamental failures, their nature, and their cause.&#8221;\u00a0The most recent example is today&#8217;s editorial,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1555","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-p5","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1555\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}