{"id":1545,"date":"2007-03-06T10:47:29","date_gmt":"2007-03-06T18:47:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2007\/03\/critic_earns_a_rave\/"},"modified":"2007-03-06T10:47:29","modified_gmt":"2007-03-06T18:47:29","slug":"critic_earns_a_rave","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2007\/03\/critic_earns_a_rave.html","title":{"rendered":"Critic Earns a Rave"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Do I hear any bravos for Justin Davidson&#8217;s principled stand against the Vienna Philharmonic? He wrote he would not be attending the orchestra&#8217;s Carnegie Hall concerts this past weekend. For that matter, he added, &#8220;it may be years before I review it again.&#8221; This is no small thing. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pulitzer.org\/year\/2002\/criticism\/bio\/\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>Davidson<\/strong><\/font><\/a> is a Pulitzer Prize-winning music critc with readers in the New York region.<br \/>\nHis piece in Newsday, headlined <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsday.com\/entertainment\/arts\/ny-etvienna5113016mar02,0,1408652.story?coll=ny-arts-headlines\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>&#8220;Vienna is slow to change its tune,&#8221;<\/strong><\/font><\/a> appeared while I was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives\/2007\/02\/gone_south.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>away in Alabama<\/strong><\/font><\/a>.<br \/>\nFurther, Davidson wrote: &#8220;I believe that the Vienna Philharmonic has relinquished its claim to serious consideration as a dynamic cultural organization.&#8221; To feminists who have criticized its exclusion of women that has been obvious for decades, as well as the fact that &#8220;the geological pace of change is not merely a regrettable obstacle in the relentless pursuit of quality. It is the product of a narrowly preservationist, antiquarian philosophy, which fetishizes sound at the expense of spirit.&#8221;<br \/>\nBut Davidson makes the unusual point, so easily overlooked, that the orchestra&#8217;s backward attitude contradicts the most significant aspect of its musical  history:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The composers in the Vienna Philharmonic&#8217;s pantheon were all disturbers of the peace, and they railed against the city&#8217;s recurring fondness for the status quo. Beethoven was a liberal idealist, a radical egalitarian and artistic revolutionary who would have been revolted by the claim that performing his forward-looking, constantly renewable music required an inflexible reverence for custom.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;This idea that the true tradition of the orchestra is one of innovation is very interesting,&#8221; says William Osborne, the Vienna Phil&#8217;s longtime nemesis. &#8220;It was only after the Nazification of the orchestra during World War II that it became associated with conservatism and tradition.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\n(Osborne, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.osborne-conant.org\/Taking-on.htm\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>I wrote long ago<\/strong><\/font><\/a>, was the chief instigator who &#8220;mobilized a tiny, far-flung band of feminists&#8221; that pressured the Vienna Philharmonic to accept its first woman member.)<br \/>\nMeanwhile, this morning&#8217;s headline over Bernard Holland&#8217;s swooning review of the Vienna Philharmonic in The New York Times, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/03\/06\/arts\/music\/06bare.html?ref=arts\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>&#8220;Viennese Boys&#8217; Club, in for the Weekend,&#8221;<\/strong><\/font><\/a> probably won&#8217;t be clipped for the orchestra&#8217;s scrap book.<br \/>\nThe review itself &#8212; with phrases such as  &#8220;overpowering beauty&#8221; and &#8220;Viennese mist of loveliness&#8221; &#8212;  leaves no doubt that Holland adores the sound of the boys&#8217; club. But Holland&#8217;s unctuous disregard of its sexism has begun to crumble &#8212; slightly. He spends three of 11 paragraphs on the orchestra&#8217;s &#8220;lack of women&#8221; and the &#8220;ruckus&#8221; it has caused, even critiquing the orchestra&#8217;s program notes as &#8220;coy&#8221; and &#8220;oozing.&#8221;<br \/>\nHolland is still as condescending as ever about the issue of feminism. And he merely repeats what Osborne has said about the importance of the Vienna Phil&#8217;s reception in America &#8220;for a lot of its prestige and bottom line.&#8221; But for the first time I&#8217;m aware of, he says: &#8220;I think the orchestra&#8217;s embrace of an all-male sound is wrong.&#8221; That&#8217;s a milestone for Holland, his caveat about American do-goodism notwithstanding.<br \/>\n<strong>Postscript:<\/strong> Davidson follows up with his take on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsday.com\/entertainment\/arts\/ny-ffcls5130818mar18,0,4207084.story?coll=ny-arts-headlines\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>race in American orchestras<\/strong><\/font><\/a> and gets a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spectator.org\/dsp_article.asp?art_id=11185\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>snide response<\/strong><\/font><\/a> at the American Spectator.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Do I hear any bravos for Justin Davidson&#8217;s principled stand against the Vienna Philharmonic? He wrote he would not be attending the orchestra&#8217;s Carnegie Hall concerts this past weekend. For that matter, he added, &#8220;it may be years before I review it again.&#8221; This is no small thing. &#8220;Vienna is slow to change its tune,&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1545","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-oV","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1545","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1545"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1545\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}