{"id":1286,"date":"2005-10-16T10:14:28","date_gmt":"2005-10-16T17:14:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2005\/10\/getting_crucial\/"},"modified":"2005-10-16T10:14:28","modified_gmt":"2005-10-16T17:14:28","slug":"getting_crucial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2005\/10\/getting_crucial.html","title":{"rendered":"GETTING CRUCIAL"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We weren&#8217;t the only ones who noticed. We just noticed sooner. So our question is: Is Frank Rich reading us? If so, there&#8217;s no crime in that. Hi Frank. We like the idea.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.jameswjohnson.com\/movies\/bushman_win.htm\" class=inline target=new\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Here's a really distasteful video\" src=\"http:\/\/buckfush.com\/images\/ABushManVideo.jpg\" width=140 align=right border=0><\/a> Deep in   <a href=\"http:\/\/select.nytimes.com\/2005\/10\/16\/opinion\/16rich.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=003399>his column today<\/strong><\/font><\/a> about the grand jury investigation of the Valerie Plame case was this crucial sentence:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Deep in a Wall Street Journal account of Judy Miller&#8217;s grand jury appearance was this crucial sentence: &#8220;Lawyers familiar with the investigation believe that at least part of the outcome likely hangs on the inner workings of what has been dubbed the White House Iraq Group.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Deep in  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/archives\/2005\/10\/big_day_at_the.html\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>our item last Wednesday<\/strong><\/font><\/a> &#8212; OK, not so deep, only in the second graf &#8212; we referred to this crucial sentence:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Lawyers familiar with the investigation believe that at least part of the outcome likely hangs on the inner workings of what has been dubbed the White House Iraq Group.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The crucial sentence first appeared &#8212; in the 11th graf, to be precise &#8212; in a story that ran under the headline <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/public\/article\/SB112907415441266084-VDsI1ez92Qlr0_XPP5IbwfiUKHI_20051111.html?mod=blogs\" class=inline target=new\"><strong><font color=#003399>&#8220;Focus of CIA Leak Probe Appears to Widen.&#8221;<\/strong><\/font><\/a> It was published last Wednesday on page 3 of The Journal&#8217;s main news section and &#8212; credit where due &#8212; was reported by John D. McKinnon, Joe Hagan and Anne Marie Squeo.<br \/>\nIt&#8217;s possible, of course, (even probable) that Rich was not reading us but was merely reading the Journal that day. So give the man a blog. If he had one, chances are he&#8217;d have noticed the crucial sentence then and posted it himself.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We weren&#8217;t the only ones who noticed. We just noticed sooner. So our question is: Is Frank Rich reading us? If so, there&#8217;s no crime in that. Hi Frank. We like the idea.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1286","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-kK","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1286\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}