{"id":1076,"date":"2005-04-05T12:09:03","date_gmt":"2005-04-05T19:09:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp\/2005\/04\/a_mark_green_b_dear_leader_and\/"},"modified":"2005-04-05T12:09:03","modified_gmt":"2005-04-05T19:09:03","slug":"a_mark_green_b_dear_leader_and","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/2005\/04\/a_mark_green_b_dear_leader_and.html","title":{"rendered":"A)  MARK GREEN, B) DEAR LEADER, AND C) MSM"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>Like a lot of Democrats, I get messages from Mark Green, the former public advocate for<br \/>\nNew York City and the president of the <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.newdemocracyproject.org\" target='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>New<br \/>\nDemocracy Project<\/FONT><\/B><\/A>.<IMG\nsrc=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/images\/mark%20green.jpg\" width=140 align=left\nborder=0><\/A><\/A> As much as I agree with his low opinion of our Dear Leader, I can&#8217;t help<br \/>\nnoticing: Green&#8217;s latest message delivered the same old, same old, and did double duty as a promo<br \/>\nfor his and Eric Alterman&#8217;s <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/0670032735\/qid=1112673348\/sr=2-2\/ref=pd_\nbbs_b_2_2\/102-4832371-2578569\" target='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;The Book on<br \/>\nBush: How George W. (Mis)leads America.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> <\/P><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>May I quote? Dear Leader &#8220;a) remains incorrigibly prone to deception and b) major media<br \/>\nessentially look the other way.&#8221; Where have we heard that before? Green, left, does elaborate<br \/>\nnicely here:<\/P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>We have an administration feeling so brazen and immune that it derisively<br \/>\ndismisses reporter Ron Suskind as &#8220;reality-based,&#8221; with an aide explaining, &#8220;We&#8217;re an empire now,<br \/>\nand when we act, we create our own reality. And while you&#8217;re studying that reality &#8212; judiciously,<br \/>\nas you will &#8212; we&#8217;ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that&#8217;s how<br \/>\nthings will sort out. We&#8217;re history&#8217;s actors &#8230; and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we<br \/>\ndo.&#8221;<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Listening to the White House spiel is like being worked over by an old &#8220;I&#8217;m Chevy Chase and<br \/>\nyou&#8217;re not&#8221; routine. Worse, according to Green&#8217;s a and b of it:<\/P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>The mainstream media cannot or will not point out Bush&#8217;s inaccuracies and<br \/>\ndishonesty as frequently as he practices them. Why? Because a) President Bush knows that our<br \/>\nnews outlets are afraid of the pain that conservative bloggers, talk show hosts and even the White<br \/>\nHouse can inflict by impugning their impartial reputations, and b) the media likes to report the<br \/>\nfirst three letters of what&#8217;s news &#8212; i.e. what&#8217;s new &#8212; and Bush&#8217;s untruthful recidivism is old<br \/>\nstuff.<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>So what does Green do? &#8220;I watch Jon Stewart&#8217;s &#8220;Daily Show&#8221; every night,&#8221; he writes. Fine.<br \/>\nBut as good as the Stewart show is, the idea of Mark Green glued to the tube to catch it every<br \/>\nnight is a little scary. You have to wonder whether someone who claims to be a serious politican<br \/>\ncould be making better use of his time.<br \/>\n<P>Besides, the truth is that the radical press and blogosphere depend on the best of the<br \/>\nmainstream media for accurate information. There are times, in fact, when nobody is more<br \/>\nforceful in denouncing Dear Leader&#8217;s regime than the editorial page of the most mainstream<br \/>\nnewspaper of all, The New York Times.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Last Friday&#8217;s lead editorial, <A class=inline\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/04\/01\/opinion\/01fri2.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials\n%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fEditorials\" target='new\"'><B><FONT color=#003399>&#8220;A Profile in<br \/>\nTimidity,&#8221;<\/FONT><\/B><\/A> was a case in point. &#8220;After more than a year&#8217;s dithering,&#8221; it said,<br \/>\nthe president&#8217;s commission on intelligence gathering produced &#8220;a big dose of political spin that<br \/>\npleased the White House but provided little enlightenment for the public.&#8221; The commission was<br \/>\nbipartisan and toothless, yielding &#8220;nothing about the central issue &#8212; how the Bush administration<br \/>\nhandled the intelligence reports on Iraq&#8217;s weapons programs and presented them to the public to<br \/>\nwin support for the invasion of Iraq&#8221;:<\/P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>All we get is an excuse: the panel was &#8220;not authorized&#8221; to look at this<br \/>\nquestion, so it didn&#8217;t bother. The report says the panel &#8220;interviewed a host of current and former<br \/>\npolicy makers&#8221; about the intelligence on Iraq, but did not &#8220;review how policy makers<br \/>\nsubsequently used that information.&#8221; (We can just see it &#8212; an investigator holding up his hand and<br \/>\ndeclaiming: &#8220;Stop right there, Mr. Secretary! We&#8217;re not authorized to know what you<br \/>\ndid.&#8221;)<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>Yes, the commission said Dear Leader&#8217;s regime was &#8220;dead wrong&#8221; about WMD because<br \/>\nintelligence analysis &#8220;was driven by a predetermined conclusion&#8221; that Saddam was a threat. Yes, it<br \/>\nsaid &#8220;it is hard to deny that intelligence analysts worked in an environment that did not encourage<br \/>\nskepticism about the conventional wisdom.&#8221; (Love that double negative.)<\/P><br \/>\n<P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE>But it utterly ignored the way President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney,<br \/>\nDefense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his team, and Condoleezza Rice, as national security<br \/>\nadviser, created that environment by deciding what the facts were and saying so, repeatedly. &#8230;[<br \/>\nAnd] it loyally maintains the fiction that Mr. Bush was just given bum information by incompetent<br \/>\nintelligence agents.<\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>If the commission&#8217;s report had any value &#8212; apart from serving as a reminder that the Senate<br \/>\nIntelligence Committee is still working on its own investigation (don&#8217;t hold your breath for<br \/>\nrevelations) &#8212; the Times concluded, &#8220;it shows us what the 9\/11 panel&#8217;s report might have looked<br \/>\nlike if Mr. Bush had succeeded in making Henry Kissinger chairman.&#8221;<\/P><br \/>\n<P>That editorial may not be as funny as &#8220;The Daily Show,&#8221; but it&#8217;s as strong as anything Jon<br \/>\nStewart has to say. I bet he&#8217;d agree, and so would Henry.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Like a lot of Democrats, I get messages from Mark Green, the former public advocate for New York City and the president of the New Democracy Project. As much as I agree with his low opinion of our Dear Leader, I can&#8217;t help noticing: Green&#8217;s latest message delivered the same old, same old, and did [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1076","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbvgEs-hm","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1076\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/herman\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}