{"id":28,"date":"2008-05-29T14:07:14","date_gmt":"2008-05-29T14:07:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp\/?p=28"},"modified":"2008-05-29T14:07:14","modified_gmt":"2008-05-29T14:07:14","slug":"laughter_and_music","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/2008\/05\/laughter_and_music\/","title":{"rendered":"Laughter and Music"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\"><span class=\"mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image\" style=\"display: inline;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"solomon2.gif\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/solomon2.gif\" class=\"mt-image-left\" style=\"margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;\" height=\"167\" width=\"191\" \/><\/span>by guest blogger <a href=\"http:\/\/www.automaticheartbreak.com\/\">Corey Dargel<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The late Robert Solomon was a professor of philosophy at the University of Texas.&nbsp; He had a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=82EV4KBIsNk\">very fun cameo<\/a> in the animated film <i>Waking Life<\/i>.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Solomon created a lecture series called <i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.teach12.com\/ttcx\/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=4123&amp;pc=Professor140\">Philosophy and the Intelligence of Emotions.<\/a><\/i> One of the lectures was titled &#8220;Laughter and Music.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Solomon argued that laughter has very little to do with what&#8217;s funny and what&#8217;s not funny.&nbsp; Rather, he believed that laughter is a bonding mechanism; its primary purpose is to create a feeling of connection between members of a certain group.&nbsp; That&#8217;s why people are more likely to laugh at a movie when they&#8217;re watching it with a group of people than when they&#8217;re watching it alone.&nbsp; That&#8217;s also why racially oriented jokes, for example, are funny to some people and offensive (or at least unfunny) to others.<\/p>\n<p>Solomon believes that music, like laughter, is primarily a bonding mechanism.&nbsp; Just as people&#8217;s senses of humor depend on the groups they associate with, so do people&#8217;s feelings about music depend on the context in which they experience it.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>To be sure, music and laughter can still have a bonding effect on someone who listens alone to a recording.&nbsp; Even in that isolated context, there&#8217;s a sense of connection with the artists who made the recording and\/or with other people who have listened to the recording.<\/p>\n<p>If you ask someone why a piece of music is &#8220;sad,&#8221; they tend to give one of the following answers:<\/p>\n<p>1) A piece of music is sad because it arouses sadness in the listener.<\/p>\n<p>2) A piece of music is sad because it was sadness that the author or composer was expressing when he or she composed it.<\/p>\n<p>But, alas, it&#8217;s not that simple.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Music that comforts some people can be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/online\/blogs\/goingson\/2008\/05\/futility-music.html\">used to torture other people<\/a>.&nbsp; Conversely, I would bet that we&#8217;ve all had the experience of listening to a really depressing piece of music and yet feeling euphoric while listening to it.&nbsp; Also, the first time people hear a piece of music can sometimes set up a<br \/>\npowerful association that recurs on every subsequent hearing.<\/p>\n<p>According to Solomon, recent research<br \/>\nsuggests that adolescence is a special age of life when people are<br \/>\nparticularly receptive to different kinds of music.&nbsp; Perhaps what they hear during that<br \/>\ntime is something they carry with them, something that sets the<br \/>\npatterns of musical meaning for the rest of their lives.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by guest blogger Corey Dargel The late Robert Solomon was a professor of philosophy at the University of Texas.&nbsp; He had a very fun cameo in the animated film Waking Life.&nbsp; Solomon created a lecture series called Philosophy and the Intelligence of Emotions. One of the lectures was titled &#8220;Laughter and Music.&#8221; Solomon argued that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-28","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}