{"id":25,"date":"2008-05-25T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-25T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp\/?p=25"},"modified":"2008-05-25T13:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-05-25T13:00:00","slug":"purposeless_purposefulness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/2008\/05\/purposeless_purposefulness\/","title":{"rendered":"Purposeless Purposefulness"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\">by guest blogger, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.automaticheartbreak.com\/\">Corey Dargel<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Greetings, everyone, and thank you to Molly for the invitation to drive this thing while she&#8217;s away.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll shift into third gear immediately by raising an issue that has caused much internal conflict for me, as a composer\/performer and especially as a writer of songs &#8212; my desire to balance personal expression with multiplicity of meaning.&nbsp; This conflict of mine was recently reinvigorated by a performance of <a href=\"http:\/\/seangriffin.org\/\">Sean Griffin<\/a>&#8216;s piece, <i>Buffalo&nbsp;&#8217;70<\/i>, at the final concert of the 2008 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.matafestival.org\/Mfestival08.html\">MATA Festival<\/a> in Brooklyn, NY.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image\" style=\"display: inline;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Buffalo70.gif\" src=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/Buffalo70.gif\" class=\"mt-image-center\" style=\"margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;\" height=\"265\" width=\"400\" \/><\/span><i>Buffalo &#8217;70<\/i><br \/>\nis a fine piece of music.&nbsp; It is intricate, funny, smart, theatrical,<br \/>\nand thoroughly engaging.&nbsp; The performers at the MATA concert &#8212; a<br \/>\ncombination of musicians from the New York-based ensembles <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newspeakmusic.org\/\">Newspeak<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eitherormusic.org\/\">Either\/Or<\/a> &#8212; executed the piece with precision and conviction, and the audience responded very positively.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, Griffin said some things about the piece that drastically restricted my experience of it.&nbsp; In the program notes, he writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[<i>Buffalo &#8217;70<\/i>] is a musical question about an encounter between John Cage and Julius Eastman&#8230; I hope to dramatize a shift in aesthetics and political strategies employed by composers at the time.&nbsp; My intention is to have this work speak to the broader cultural shifts in expression and identity in the political landscape of the late 1970s and the return to a more brutally conservative America in the 1980s. <\/p>\n<p>In 1970, composer\/performer Julius Eastman was performing sections of John Cage&#8217;s <i>Song Books<\/i> and included gay references in his realization of the work. Although allowed by the score itself, Cage became angry and famously objected with a violent outburst&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Before the performance, Griffin spoke briefly to the concert audience.&nbsp; He clarified his intent by announcing that Julius Eastman was his favorite composer and that <i>Buffalo &#8217;70<\/i> is comprised of a number of John Cage&#8217;s pieces all realized with deliberate inappropriateness.&nbsp; He also put forward a dubious theory that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stylusmagazine.com\/articles\/weekly_article\/john-cage-crises-of-authenticity.htm\">Cage&#8217;s outburst<\/a> somehow led to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mjleach.com\/eastman.htm\">Eastman&#8217;s tragic personal unravelling<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Knowing that <i>Buffalo &#8217;70<\/i> was, at least in part, a disparaging parody of John Cage&#8217;s music all but erased its potential for multiple interpretations.&nbsp; This constriction of meaning is, I think, one of the things that upset Cage about Eastman&#8217;s performance of <i>Song Books<\/i>.&nbsp; And Cage was not the only one who was upset.&nbsp; The conductor of that performance, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.semensemble.org\/pk.html\">Petr Kotik<\/a>, described Eastman&#8217;s behavior as &#8220;sabotage.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>All of this got me thinking: It may be that Cage represents the epitome of one kind of high-modernism &#8212; the desire to create works of art in which the personal identities and emotions of the artists are completely absent.&nbsp; The opposite of that, I suppose, would be art as purely a vehicle for self-expression, or what I like to call &#8220;art as therapy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Is the incorporation into &#8220;fine art&#8221; of identity politics and self-expression the kind of &#8220;cultural shift in expression and identity&#8221; that Griffin is referring to in his program notes?&nbsp; Is the &#8220;more brutally conservative America&#8221; a reference to the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s during which Senator Helms et al attacked artists who received government funding to create so-called blasphemous works of art?&nbsp; That is what I assume Griffin is talking about. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s another side to that argument.&nbsp; The mentality of art-as-self-expression, combined with the politically correct, uncritical acceptance of identity politics in art, has led to plenty of overly sentimental vanity projects.&nbsp; This is another kind of &#8220;brutally conservative&#8221; approach to making art which is just as lamentable as the reactionary philistinism of Helms and company.<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by guest blogger, Corey Dargel Greetings, everyone, and thank you to Molly for the invitation to drive this thing while she&#8217;s away.&nbsp; I&#8217;ll shift into third gear immediately by raising an issue that has caused much internal conflict for me, as a composer\/performer and especially as a writer of songs &#8212; my desire to balance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-25","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/gap\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}