![\"neilharpists.jpg\"](\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/neilharpists.jpg\")
<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n“It’s so internal!” my friend Amanda says with admiration The insides of Greenberg’s dancers are not at risk: they inhabit Meanwhile, the arms are socially aware–grace notes of affect, as are the flowers in the hair of boys and girls alike. Fragility Only the gaze enters the world <\/font>naked<\/font>–shed of inwardness. Or it tries to, anyway. Eyes askew in the head and head askew on the spine as You know those people who find fault with one lover after Greenberg homes in on this poignant paradox, which, he discovers, life shares with dance. His subject is invariably an inner life that we can only approach via surfaces–an inner life made up<\/i>, in fact, <\/i>of surfaces, the detritus of the everyday. <\/font> <\/span><\/p>\n “Really Queer Dance with Harps” may be no more inward than previous dances–as usual, each dancer is alone with others, never touching (until the goofy coda) and never acknowledging anyone in any conventional sense, and as usual the dancers share a family of gestures that means something particular to each of them. But here those family members are especially individual. (The eight highly trained, <\/font>wonderfully idiosyncratic <\/font> dancers are Ellen Barnaby, Nicholas Duran, Johnni Durango, Christine Elmo, Paige Martin, Luke Miller, Antonio Ramos, and Colin Stilwell.) <\/font><\/p>\n Until recently, Greenberg devised his choreography on his “Really Queer Dance with Harps” is low key and in no hurry. The In this, it’s <\/font>like life, too. <\/span> <\/span> <\/p>\n For more, here’s the <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Photo by Julia Cervantes for Dance Theater Workshop. “It’s so internal!” my friend Amanda says with admiration about Neil Greenberg’s “Really Queer Dance with Harps,” which premiered a couple of weeks ago at Dance Theater Workshop. One move–a series of changements on half-point–reminded her of a schizophrenic she’d seen outside a hospital in Rome jangling his insides with stiff little jumps. The insides […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-549","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<\/o:p><\/p>\n
\nabout Neil Greenberg’s “Really Queer Dance with Harps,<\/span><\/em>” <\/span><\/i>which premiered a couple
\nof weeks ago at Dance Theater Workshop. One move–a series of changements <\/i>on half-point–reminded her
\nof a schizophrenic she’d seen outside a hospital in Rome jangling his insides with
\nstiff little jumps. <\/font><\/p>\n
\na whorl of trunk as sturdy as a tree’s. <\/span>But
\ntheir bare galumphing feet–smacking the floor exactly as you’re taught not to <\/i>in ballet class–<\/font>resound with social ineptitude and a
\nrough flamboyance<\/font>. They call to mind Frankenstein’s
\nmonster (on a good day).
<\/font><\/p>\n
\nand delicacy, self-declaration and tribal identification, flutter on the
\nbody’s periphery as if the soul and its accessories were butterflies. In
\none of “Really Queer Dance’s” several distinct phrases, one hand grazes
\nthe vulnerable crease in the hip where an angel forced Jacob to testify, while the other reaches overhead like a weather vane or the paw of a disco queen feeling out the
\nscene. <\/font><\/p>\n
\nif the effort caused all sorts of distortions, the dancers peer
\nat the wall of darkness that separates us from them without recognition, or seduction, in
\nthe look.<\/font><\/p>\n
\nanother for years on end without it ever occurring to them that the problem
\nmight lie with their conception of love? Well, the dance equivalent is the false notion that dance is the most unmediated of arts, the
\nleast artful of arts, a quasi-art that delivers its truths straight. People who
\ninsist they really do like dance, it’s only a matter of finding the right<\/i> dance, are often seeking sheer physicality! sheer feeling! sheer
\npleasure!<\/i> <\/span>But precisely because dance
\nis <\/i>physical, which, yes, is tangled
\nup in our minds with pleasure and feeling, it can’t only be physical, emotional,
\npleasurable, or it wouldn’t be art, it would just be body, feeling, sensation. On the other hand, it has no choice but to present even introspection on the surface. All it has is surface, which does double duty as inside and out.
<\/font><\/p>\n
\nown body, videotaping himself improvising, then editing what he saw for his
\ndancers’ consumption. For “Really Queer Dance with Harps” and its companion on
\nthe program, the equally glorious though short “Quartet with Three Gay Men,” he
\ndecided to have the dancers invent most of the phrases. The effect is to
\nintensify the scene’s <\/font>casual-seeming, non-syncopated character. The phrases
\nseem more than ever like floating id\u00e9es
\nfixes<\/i>, snagging on a person like a plastic bag on a rosebush. Sometimes they become assimilated into her style of being, and
\nsometimes they don’t. <\/font><\/p>\n
\nmovement has more feeling and lusciousness than the Cunningham vocabulary it
\ngrew out of. (At this juncture, too many of Cunningham’s dancers treat steps as if
\nthey were a task assigned them, above which they can smile at each other unbothered. Cunningham should ask them to commit all<\/i> of themselves to what they’re doing.)
\nAnd three golden harpists massage <\/font>Zeena Parkins’ mercurial music into <\/font>their heart-shaped harps to call to mind the heart. But the dance does share Cunningham’s aversion
\nto the conventional dramatic arc–and the present he lets you sink into and pull back
\nfrom again and again. <\/font><\/p>\n
<\/font><\/p>\n
\nesteemed Roslyn Sulcas’ excellent review<\/a> for the New York Times and my friend Nancy Dalva’s Danceviewtimes post<\/a>. For the full monty of previews and views, try Dance Theater Workshop’s web site <\/a>(which has failed to include this blog as well as danceviewtimes, for example, on
\nits blog roll. Sigh. Why even have a blog roll if it’s so strictly self-serving?) <\/span> <\/span>
<\/i><\/font><\/p>\n