{"id":417,"date":"2007-02-05T23:45:39","date_gmt":"2007-02-06T07:45:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp\/2007\/02\/brian_seibert_and_apollinaire\/"},"modified":"2007-02-05T23:45:39","modified_gmt":"2007-02-06T07:45:39","slug":"brian_seibert_and_apollinaire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/2007\/02\/brian_seibert_and_apollinaire.html","title":{"rendered":"Brian Seibert and Apollinaire: Weeping over the lost worlds of &#8220;Liebeslieder Walzer&#8221;; plus, does a ballet corps distil or diffuse?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>[Brian Seibert, contributor to the New Yorker&#8217;s Goings on About Town section, is writing a book on the history of tap. He&#8217;s responding to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/2007\/02\/apollinaire_this_or_thatpickin.html\">my response, <\/a> below, to a couple of nights at the New York City Ballet, one with Terry Teachout for &#8220;Liebeslieder Walzer&#8221; and another for &#8220;Serenade,&#8221; both by Balanchine.]<\/em><br \/>\nI also was there on Thursday and, like Terry, I cried. &#8220;Liebeslieder&#8221; always has that effect on me. I love &#8220;Serenade&#8221; too, though I don&#8217;t know that the corps causes more distillation &#8212; more diffusion maybe; that&#8217;s how drama becomes atmosphere, as you say. A mass is always going to have a different effect from an intertwining of couples. &#8220;Echo and setting&#8221; is right &#8212; the corps is chorus.<br \/>\nBeyond the poetic distillation, detail after gorgeous detail, what I love best about &#8220;Liebeslieder&#8221; is the way that such an intimate dance &#8212; a dance with no corps &#8212; manages to suggest something world-historical. It&#8217;s not specific; I sometimes imagine it as a mix of what was lost in World War I, sometimes as what was destroyed by Hitler. Some lost beauty that appears before us for a moment. That, I think, is what makes me weep.<br \/>\nA lost beauty: &#8220;Liebeslieder&#8221; with that cast of veterans on Thursday night (Darci Kistler, Kyra Nichols, Wendy Whelan, Miranda Weese) also makes me think, &#8220;This is a dance that still lives.&#8221; With just about everything else in the New York City Ballet repertory, I&#8217;m inclined to believe those voices that insist that I, someone who started watching the company only five years ago, came too late. I read the old accounts and I watch the pieces today, and I sit there imagining them done differently in subtle ways that make all the difference. Watching &#8220;Liebeslieder,&#8221; I can&#8217;t really imagine any better.<br \/>\n[<em>Apollinaire:<\/em>] Oooooooooooooohh, I like that idea of a lost European world being glimpsed through this ballet, Brian. Neat!<br \/>\nAlso, I understand what you mean, that a corps would seem to diffuse, rather than distill, the drama. But what interests me is that maybe it doesn&#8217;t always work that way. I may have been confusing two sensations at once: the emotional respite that moments of the corps provide, on the one hand, and the poetic pileup that they enable, on the other.<br \/>\nFor example, with &#8220;Serenade,&#8221; the momentous gestures of the woman who is carried to her death wouldn&#8217;t mean as much if we didn&#8217;t feel what a gail wind this ballet conceives time as. Poetic distillation works by lending the particular a feel of generality, or universal applicability. So it makes sense that a corps would have a poetic function.<br \/>\nThere isn&#8217;t much background in poetry. As in dream, every moment is now. As a visual art, dance may make field\/ground distinctions, but the emotional sense <em>we <\/em>make of it doesn&#8217;t, I don&#8217;t think. The seeming periphera and seeming center shape each other. Otherwise, the most intense or affecting dances would always be the ones without a corps.<br \/>\nBy analogy, in Mozart&#8217;s piano concertos, which are structured like operas, the violins nuance the piano, not just the other way around. It&#8217;s not like the piano says all the important things and then the orchestra simply responds &#8220;Yes&#8217;m.&#8221;<br \/>\nAnyway, I revised my ditty to reflect your feedback. Thank you!<br \/>\nRe: the old NYCB world being better: everyone sure says so, and there are definitely dances I have to squint at to find. But &#8220;Serenade&#8221; on Friday night wasn&#8217;t one of them.<br \/>\nThanks so much for writing, Brian.<br \/>\n<em>[The discussion of &#8220;Serenade,&#8221; &#8220;Liebeslieder,&#8221; and the corps continues with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/2007\/02\/paul_parish_more_on_the_lost_w.html\">Foot contributor Paul Parish&#8217;s<\/a> marvelous essay, and ends with me <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/2007\/02\/apollinaire_chorus_corps_reali.html\">here<\/a>. For more on Balanchine&#8217;s &#8220;Serenade&#8221; (and who can get too much of &#8220;Serenade&#8221;?) here&#8217;s my response to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/2007\/11\/pennsylvania_ballets_romantic.html\">Pennsylvania Ballet&#8217;s interpretation<\/a> at City Center in November 2007.] <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[Brian Seibert, contributor to the New Yorker&#8217;s Goings on About Town section, is writing a book on the history of tap. He&#8217;s responding to my response, below, to a couple of nights at the New York City Ballet, one with Terry Teachout for &#8220;Liebeslieder Walzer&#8221; and another for &#8220;Serenade,&#8221; both by Balanchine.] I also was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-417","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/417\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}