{"id":375,"date":"2006-10-31T15:01:07","date_gmt":"2006-10-31T23:01:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp\/2006\/10\/reader_amy_reusch_asks_arent_a\/"},"modified":"2006-10-31T15:01:07","modified_gmt":"2006-10-31T23:01:07","slug":"reader_amy_reusch_asks_arent_a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/2006\/10\/reader_amy_reusch_asks_arent_a.html","title":{"rendered":"Reader Amy Reusch asks: aren&#8217;t all ballets by now-dead choreographers &#8220;covers&#8221;? Apollinaire answers."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Reader and dance videographer Amy Reusch sent me this comment last night in response to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/2006\/10\/apollinaire_call_out_to_choreo.html\">my call out to choreographers for a night of Dylan dance &#8220;covers.&#8221;<\/a><br \/>\n<em>Regarding &#8220;covers,&#8221; I think that&#8217;s pretty much all we see in the ballet world when we watch the work of a dead choreographer. I mean, aren&#8217;t we seeing a cover when we watch &#8220;Swan Lake&#8221;? Is the Paris Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Jewels&#8221; close enough to the original not to be considered a cover? Perhaps. But &#8220;La Sylphide&#8221; is definitely Bournonville&#8217;s cover of Taglioni, right?<\/em><br \/>\n<strong>Apollinaire responds: <\/strong><br \/>\nYes! I think we could consider any piece of repertory that has survived its original cast a &#8220;cover.&#8221;<br \/>\nThe advantage to the term is, it&#8217;s playful: &#8220;Cover&#8221; allows the current rendition of the dance some breathing room from the past and emphasizes the dancers&#8217; interpretive powers. At the same time, the tag reminds us that all of this play started somewhere.<br \/>\nWith 20th century repertory, that <em>somewhere <\/em>is usually well documented: there are specific steps to do. For older repertory, there&#8217;s a spirit to honor&#8211;though its exact nature is open to interpretation. Some interpretations, whatever the circumstances, will be wretched&#8211;file under &#8220;Dylan-Tharp musical.&#8221;<br \/>\n<strong>Amy writes:<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>I wouldn&#8217;t mind a Dylan Fest&#8211;like the Stravinsky Festival?&#8211; except I&#8217;m generally not fond of choreography to lyrics. <\/em><br \/>\n<strong>Apollinaire responds: <\/strong><br \/>\nBut, Amy! What about Balanchine&#8217;s &#8221;Liebeslieder Waltzer&#8221; or &#8220;Who Cares?,&#8221; with Gershwin tunes shadowed by Gershwin lyrics? What about all those Mark Morris dances? For example: &#8220;New Love Song Waltzes,&#8221; to the same Brahms love songs as Balanchine&#8217;s &#8220;Liebeslieder&#8221;; &#8220;Gloria,&#8221; to Vivaldi&#8217;s praise song to God; the country-western romp &#8220;Going Away Party.&#8221;<br \/>\nYou&#8217;re right, though: dances to song are hard to pull off, particularly in pop, with its intelligible and thus dominating lyrics. I&#8217;ve seen my share of fiascos.<br \/>\nSongs actually behave the same way as a lot of dances. More than telling a story, they set up a situation or lay down an emotional landscape. A dance to a song can do that too, but it needs to acknowledge the song&#8217;s occasion, or you get Twyla Tharp&#8217;s &#8220;The Times They Are A-Changin&#8217;.&#8221;<br \/>\nIn &#8220;Like a Rolling Stone,&#8221; one of the two dozen songs in &#8220;The Times They Are,&#8221; the vengeful singer exults in the downfall of a hipster-princess who used to &#8220;Let other people\/Get [her]\/Kicks for [her].&#8221; Or, if you prefer, the singer really wants to know&#8211;because it&#8217;s his question, too&#8211; &#8220;How does it feel?\/To be on your own\/With no direction home\/A complete unknown\/Like a rolling stone.&#8221;<br \/>\nIn any case, Tharp couldn&#8217;t care less. Her method is to select iconic images from each song and string them together into a single, dopey epic.<br \/>\nFor &#8220;Like a Rolling Stone,&#8221; she extracts &#8220;rolling&#8221; and &#8220;stone&#8221; to set the dancers bouncing on black Pilates balls. It&#8217;s a two-fer. They&#8217;re both the rolling-stone hipster and &#8220;the jugglers and the clowns&#8221; doing tricks for&#8211;well, not for <em>her <\/em>because there isn&#8217;t any princess here, but for us, I guess, or for the circus ringmaster and his <em>blue-eyed son <\/em>(nudge, nudge) at the center of this nonsensical oedipal drama. In any case, the story has stopped mattering.<br \/>\nTharp reminds me of a demented ninth grade English teacher. She hunts down every Symbol and sends it flying.<br \/>\nSo, yeah, if the choreographer takes a dunderheaded approach, dance to song is a bad idea. Otherwise, the weave can be rich and satisfying.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reader and dance videographer Amy Reusch sent me this comment last night in response to my call out to choreographers for a night of Dylan dance &#8220;covers.&#8221; Regarding &#8220;covers,&#8221; I think that&#8217;s pretty much all we see in the ballet world when we watch the work of a dead choreographer. I mean, aren&#8217;t we seeing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-375","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=375"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/375\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/foot\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}