{"id":3626,"date":"2014-06-04T00:41:34","date_gmt":"2014-06-04T04:41:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/?p=3626"},"modified":"2014-06-04T00:41:34","modified_gmt":"2014-06-04T04:41:34","slug":"mental-logjam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/2014\/06\/mental-logjam\/","title":{"rendered":"Mental Logjam"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Logjam\"During my participation in Utah Arts and Museum’s Mountain West Arts Conference, I had the opportunity to hear Laura Smith from the National Assembly of State Arts Agencies present an overview of recent funding trends in the U.S. Listening to the statistics, a not directly related thought occurred to me. (My mind does tend to wander. But this time it was relevant wandering.) Standard categories for tracking charitable giving include “arts and culture” and “human services.” For the first time in my life I tumbled to several issues related to those labels.<\/p>\n

The fact that the two are separated clearly demonstrates that those establishing the categories do not imagine that arts and culture are or could be human services. This is so basic as to be an unexamined assumption on the part of most people. And that leads me to the flip side of this, the assumption is so basic that we in the arts yield the field in not speaking up for arts as human service. If human services implies addressing physical needs, that might make some sense. However, at least some things included in that category (psychological counseling is one example) deal with the inner self beyond water-food-shelter. I realized while listening to Ms. Smith that if we more fully believed in the power of the arts to transform lives (and put our energies to making that transformation a reality for people who do not come to us on their own) we would be more deeply rooted in the fabric of our communities. We might be approaching indispensability<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This is not a call for actually revising these tracking categories. That would not make sense now nor would it probably be productive in the future. (Plus there is no way that could be done at this late date in the development of our databases.) But thinking about this does provide some valuable perspective for us in imagining our role in communities and in ways we can come to be seen as more valuable in the lives of those around us.<\/p>\n

Engage!<\/p>\n

Doug<\/p>\n

Photo: \"Attribution\"\"Noncommercial\"<\/a><\/span> Some rights reserved<\/a> by The Forest History Society<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The mental model separating arts and human services.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3630,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Mental Logjam-Arts or Human Services? Or both? http:\/\/wp.me\/p1G6h9-Wu","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[5],"tags":[12,13,35,22],"class_list":{"0":"post-3626","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-principles","8":"tag-arts","9":"tag-community-engagement","10":"tag-grants","11":"tag-public-good","12":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Logjam-e1400689089260.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1G6h9-Wu","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5047,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/2017\/10\/excellence-and-engagement-ii\/","url_meta":{"origin":3626,"position":0},"title":"Excellence and Engagement: II","author":"Doug Borwick","date":"October 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Excellence and Engagement: Participatory activities, community benefit, and personal meaning.","rel":"","context":"In "Principles"","block_context":{"text":"Principles","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/category\/principles\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/ExcellenceSign.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1005,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/2012\/01\/art-for-arts-sake\/","url_meta":{"origin":3626,"position":1},"title":"Art for Art’s Sake? There’s No Such Thing","author":"Doug Borwick","date":"January 11, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"So here is a bit of heresy for the New Year. A recent post by Clayton Lord on his blog New Beans, This Is Your Brain on Art (sizzle, sizzle), reminded me of my first exposure to the Rand Corporation's 2005 Gifts of the Muse study. A distinction was made\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Overview"","block_context":{"text":"Overview","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/category\/overview\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/PaintBrushes.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":3868,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/2015\/02\/arts-predispositions-ii-maybes\/","url_meta":{"origin":3626,"position":2},"title":"Arts Predispositions II: Maybes","author":"Doug Borwick","date":"February 11, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Understanding non-participants. Arts Predispositions: Maybes","rel":"","context":"In "Principles"","block_context":{"text":"Principles","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/category\/principles\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Crowd-Cropped-e1412550057746.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Crowd-Cropped-e1412550057746.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Crowd-Cropped-e1412550057746.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2328,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/2013\/01\/an-engagement-continuum\/","url_meta":{"origin":3626,"position":3},"title":"An Engagement Continuum","author":"Doug Borwick","date":"January 23, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"[Note to new readers: This is a very old and widely read post. In the interest of providing up-to-date information about thinking on this topic, you can find updated definitions of terminology related to community engagement and related arts management tools on the ArtsEngaged website here.] I'm on a roll\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Overview"","block_context":{"text":"Overview","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/category\/overview\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/TownHallMeeting-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5015,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/2017\/09\/evaluating-engagement-outcomes\/","url_meta":{"origin":3626,"position":4},"title":"Evaluating Engagement: Outcomes","author":"Doug Borwick","date":"September 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Evaluating Engagement: Outcomes as a follow up to an earlier post on evaluating engagement processes","rel":"","context":"In "The Practice of Engagement"","block_context":{"text":"The Practice of Engagement","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/category\/the-practice-of-engagement\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Clipboard.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5053,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/2017\/10\/excellence-and-engagement-iii\/","url_meta":{"origin":3626,"position":5},"title":"Excellence and Engagement: III","author":"Doug Borwick","date":"October 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Excellence and Engagement: Considering equity and respect.","rel":"","context":"In "Principles"","block_context":{"text":"Principles","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/category\/principles\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/ExcellenceSign.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3626","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3626"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3626\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3626"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3626"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/engage\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}