Back in January I finally canceled my subscription to the daily newspaper. Tough (and symbolic) thing to do. I’ve always subscribed to the local paper. My paper had become thinner and thinner as the stories I used to buy it for drained away with cuts in space and staff. Many of the stories were now being written by interns.<\/p>\n
I’m an online guy, and I get most of my news online. Still, it seemed important to support the local newspaper. Even when the width of the paper was trimmed to about the size of a tab. Holding it in my hands just seemed… wrong. <\/p>\n
So when Hearst announced it was going to close the Seattle Post-Intelligencer<\/i> if it couldn’t find a buyer in 60 days, I decided I would leave the P-I before it left me (I never did like being the one who was left). When I called to cancel, they offered me a steep discount – half off. I said no, and for good measure, told them it was because they had cut so much of their arts coverage. <\/p>\n
A week later, someone from the Times\/P-I circulation department called with an even better deal. For only a couple dollars a week, I could be restarted. They didn’t want to lose me. I said no, and repeated my line about the loss of stories I liked and the shrinking of the paper. “Yes, but it’s only a couple bucks a week!” the guy said. Yeah, said I, but that doesn’t matter if what I wanted was no longer there. <\/p>\n
A couple of months later the P-I closed. The rival Times, which ran the joint subscription business side of the operation automatically transferred former P-I subscribers to Times clients. This week I’ve had two calls from the Times. First, they wanted to “reward” me for being a “loyal” subscriber by giving me a free subscription. No, I said.<\/p>\n
The next day someone else called to offer me a subscription for 24 cents a week. That’s only $10 a year! exclaimed the agent. How could I pass that up? Pretty easily, I said, to his professed astonishment. Only $10!<\/p>\n
“So cheap they can’t give it away.” An expression my dad used to use from time to time. Now I understand. Maybe it’s churlish not to support the local papers by subscribing. But I’m surprised by how offended I am at the way they have run their businesses. By how they have offered less and less. By how they have repeatedly insulted the intelligence of the readers who cared about them. I’m sorry the P-I is gone. But now it’s time to move on.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Back in January I finally canceled my subscription to the daily newspaper. Tough (and symbolic) thing to do. I’ve always subscribed to the local paper. My paper had become thinner and thinner as the stories I used to buy it for drained away with cuts in space and staff. Many of the stories were now […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-347","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4ePZm-5B","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":14,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2006\/09\/the_best_culture_coverage.html","url_meta":{"origin":347,"position":0},"title":"The Best Culture Coverage?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"September 19, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"I like the Guardian. Though it has a good stable of writers, its biggest strength is its editing. The Guardian is a consistently lively read day in and day out. This is a paper that isn't afraid to argue with itself. A critic might sound off on some topic one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "main"","block_context":{"text":"main","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/main"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":352,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/05\/movie_critics-2.html","url_meta":{"origin":347,"position":1},"title":"Us Against “Them” (That Anti-Expert Thing Again)","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"May 11, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"In the Weekly Standard, John Podhoretz has noted the carnage of movie critics at newspapers. He isn't weeping. Movie criticism has been a feature of American newspapers for a\u00a0century, and sadly, one can count the standout critics throughout that\u00a0time on maybe two hands. Many of these jobs were filled by\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/05\/movie_critics-2.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"siskelandebert.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/siskelandebert.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":61,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/03\/paper_killers.html","url_meta":{"origin":347,"position":2},"title":"Paper Killers","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"March 23, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Newspapers aren't the only ones contemplating a digital future. The University of Michigan Press says it will move from paper to pixels:Michigan officials say that their move reflects a belief that it's time to stop trying to make the old economics of scholarly publishing work. \"I have been increasingly convinced\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 2 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 2 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/03\/paper_killers.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"kindle.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/kindle.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":350,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/t_is_for_torture_period_just_s-2.html","url_meta":{"origin":347,"position":3},"title":""T" Is For Torture. Period. Just Say It","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"April 28, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"One of the big failings of traditional media is its fetishization of \"objectivity\" in the face of facts. At its best, objectivity is an attempt at fairness to present opposing views. But too often it reflexively reduces issues to non-sensical polarized he said\/she said arguments without the journalistic application of\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":915,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2016\/07\/do-artists-have-a-vision-for-the-future.html","url_meta":{"origin":347,"position":4},"title":"Do Artists Have A Vision For The Future?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"July 10, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Around the beginning of the 20th Century, some French artists were asked to design a series of cards that would imagine what life would be like 100 years in the future in the year 2000. The first cards were created for the 1900 World Exhibition in Paris and eventually there\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "arts & tech"","block_context":{"text":"arts & tech","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/arts-tech"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/France_in_XXI_Century._Electric_scrubbing.jpg?fit=1200%2C757&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/France_in_XXI_Century._Electric_scrubbing.jpg?fit=1200%2C757&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/France_in_XXI_Century._Electric_scrubbing.jpg?fit=1200%2C757&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/France_in_XXI_Century._Electric_scrubbing.jpg?fit=1200%2C757&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/France_in_XXI_Century._Electric_scrubbing.jpg?fit=1200%2C757&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":35,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2007\/11\/rethinking_mass_culture.html","url_meta":{"origin":347,"position":5},"title":"Rethinking Mass Culture","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"November 15, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"We're consumed by the idea of mass culture. Since television (and before it, radio) brought the immediacy of produced culture into our living rooms, we've treated the power of a massive aggregated audience with awe. That something is popular enough to attain common currency means it has power. Mass culture\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "main"","block_context":{"text":"main","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/main"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}