{"id":345,"date":"2009-03-26T07:55:03","date_gmt":"2009-03-26T07:55:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp\/2009\/03\/will_obamas_tax_changes_hurt_t\/"},"modified":"2009-03-26T07:55:03","modified_gmt":"2009-03-26T07:55:03","slug":"will_obamas_tax_changes_hurt_t-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/03\/will_obamas_tax_changes_hurt_t-2.html","title":{"rendered":"Will Obama&#039;s Tax Changes Hurt the Arts?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Vastine Stabler <a href=\"http:\/\/mainlineexpress.blogspot.com\/2009\/03\/arts-and-charitable-deduction.html\">makes a case<\/a> that changing the tax code to reduce the the top rate of deduction for charitable giving from 35% to 28% will have an enormous impact on giving to the arts:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p>It may be shocking to learn that the level of federal support for the arts in the United States is most likely the highest in the world. To understand why you need to know how non-profit arts are funded in the United States. Approximately 50% of the financial support for the arts comes from earned income and another 10 % comes from non-federal government support. The final 40% of arts funding comes from private donations. It is this 40% where the US government makes its true impact on the arts. Depending on the donor&#8217;s tax bracket, up to 35% of individual donations are funds diverted from the US Treasury to the arts through tax deductions. This amounts to a multi-billion dollar investment by the federal government each year. While many are unaware of the largess of Uncle Sam via these deductions, the fact has not escaped our current administration.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>He makes the point that support for the arts in the US is &#8220;incentivized&#8221; giving. That is, the government helps to reward the private sector for supporting charities. If you buy in to this reasoning, then changing the incentive to give will make a big impact: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Currently, someone who is in the 35% tax bracket can deduct 35% of their donations to officially designated non-profits. In the current<br \/>\nbill the most donors can deduct is 28%. This differential will make<br \/>\nmonumental changes to the giving patterns of our largest donors.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>President Obama addressed the issue at his press conference Tuesday night:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\n<b>QUESTION:<\/b>  Are you reconsidering your plan to cut the [deduction for charitable contributions]?<\/p>\n<p><b>OBAMA:<\/b>  No&#8230;I think it&#8217;s the right thing to do, we&#8217;ve got to make some difficult choices&#8230;.What we&#8217;ve said is: Let&#8217;s go back to the rate that existed under Ronald Reagan.  People are still going to be able to make charitable contributions.  It just means, if you give $100 and you&#8217;re in this tax bracket, at a certain point, instead of being able to write off 36% or 39%, you&#8217;re writing off 28%.  Now, if it&#8217;s really a charitable contribution, I&#8217;m assuming that that shouldn&#8217;t be the determining factor as to whether you&#8217;re giving that $100 to the homeless shelter down the street&#8230;. I think it is a realistic way for us to raise some revenue from people who&#8217;ve benefited enormously over the last several years.  It&#8217;s not going to cripple them.  They&#8217;ll still be well-to-do&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p><b>QUESTION<\/b>:  It&#8217;s not the well-to-do people.  It&#8217;s the charities.  Given what you&#8217;ve just said, are you confident the charities are wrong when they contend that this would discourage giving?<\/p>\n<p><b>OBAMA<\/b>:  Yes, I am.  I mean, if you look at the evidence, there&#8217;s very little evidence that this has a significant impact on charitable giving.  I&#8217;ll tell you what has a significant impact on charitable giving, is a financial crisis and an economy that&#8217;s contracting.  And so the most important thing that I can do for charitable giving is to fix the economy, to get banks lending again, to get businesses opening their doors again, to get people back to work again.  Then I think charities will do just fine.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>On the issue of overall fairness, this argument make sense, but from a practical matter the question is what percentage of charitable contributions are motivated by the tax break and how much of a motivation that extra seven percent is. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vastine Stabler makes a case that changing the tax code to reduce the the top rate of deduction for charitable giving from 35% to 28% will have an enormous impact on giving to the arts: It may be shocking to learn that the level of federal support for the arts in the United States is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-345","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4ePZm-5z","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":57,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/03\/help_for_the_arts_but_10000_ar.html","url_meta":{"origin":345,"position":0},"title":"Help For The Arts (But 10,000 Arts Groups Could Go Out Of Business)","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"March 20, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Americans for the Arts has warned arts organizations to plan scenarios for 40% cuts in their budgets as the economy gets worse. And the group says that 10,000 arts organizations could go out of business in this recession. Some have been saying for some time that the arts were overbuilt\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"header_logo.gif","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/header_logo.gif?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":54,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/03\/is_the_nea_bad_for_the_arts.html","url_meta":{"origin":345,"position":1},"title":"Is the NEA bad for the arts?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"March 18, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"A ridiculous question, sure. The National Endowment for the Arts is the channel through which the federal government invests money in the arts. And though it's not much money, compared to what other countries invest, it's something. Besides giving money, the NEA also has the value of drawing attention or\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/03\/is_the_nea_bad_for_the_arts.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"images.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/images.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":401,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2012\/01\/the-party-of-cant-and-wont-so-lets-change-the-conversation-2.html","url_meta":{"origin":345,"position":2},"title":"The Party of Can&#039;t And Won&#039;t (So Let&#039;s Change The Conversation)","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"January 9, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Mitt Romney said last week he'll kick funding for the arts and public broadcasting to the curb if he gets to be president. \"We're not going to kill Big Bird, but Big Bird is going to have advertisements,\" Romney said, while speaking at Homer's Deli in Clinton, Iowa. Like virtually\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;arts funding&quot;","block_context":{"text":"arts funding","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/arts-funding"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/canceled.jpg?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/canceled.jpg?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/canceled.jpg?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/canceled.jpg?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/01\/canceled.jpg?fit=1200%2C913&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2354,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2020\/04\/arts-rebuild-what-and-why.html","url_meta":{"origin":345,"position":3},"title":"Arts: Rebuild What? And Why?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"April 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"You can see this as nothing but loss. Or perhaps some of our most intractable debates are now suddenly shaken free of their old moorings.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;arts and business&quot;","block_context":{"text":"arts and business","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/arts-and-business"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/bridge-2379871_12801.jpg?fit=800%2C461&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/bridge-2379871_12801.jpg?fit=800%2C461&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/bridge-2379871_12801.jpg?fit=800%2C461&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/bridge-2379871_12801.jpg?fit=800%2C461&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2429,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2020\/08\/five-things-1-business-models-and-a-9-billion-idea.html","url_meta":{"origin":345,"position":4},"title":"Business Models and a $9 Billion Idea","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"August 23, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"We need a significant, stable ongoing source of new funding that is politically insulated and inflation-proof.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;arts and business&quot;","block_context":{"text":"arts and business","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/arts-and-business"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/cars-2605953_1280.jpg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/cars-2605953_1280.jpg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/cars-2605953_1280.jpg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/cars-2605953_1280.jpg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/cars-2605953_1280.jpg?fit=1200%2C673&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1178,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2016\/09\/arts-congressional-report-card-why-the-arts-have-no-political-clout.html","url_meta":{"origin":345,"position":5},"title":"Arts Congressional Report Card: Why The Arts Have No Political Clout","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"September 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Americans for the Arts Action Fund PAC has released its 2016 Congressional Arts Report Card rating members of Congress on their support for the arts. Many lobby groups do such rankings as a way of \"holding politicians accountable\" for how they vote on issues the lobbyists care about. The rankings\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;arts and politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"arts and politics","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/arts-and-politics"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/00cdff2bc5f6c0901a_dgm6bh30v.jpg?fit=674%2C870&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/00cdff2bc5f6c0901a_dgm6bh30v.jpg?fit=674%2C870&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/00cdff2bc5f6c0901a_dgm6bh30v.jpg?fit=674%2C870&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}