John: We’re getting close to the end of our conversation, but there are still things I wanted to ask you. One, which you bring up in your last post is about how cultural coverage is pitched. I get that in a mass-culture world the way to get audiences is to try to appeal to a general reader. Unfortunately this has come to mean dumbing down rather than being smart and accessible.
\nBut I think that the strategies that work in a mass culture model actually work against you in a world of niches. That is – as people can choose more and more specifically what they want, they’re less willing to accept the blandly generic. Mass culture works because, while it might not totally satisfy all that many people, it’s inoffensive enough that many people will accept it when their choices are limited.
\nThe genius of newspapers back when was that they aggregated readers with specific interests. By offering lots of variety, newspapers collected many audiences, which in turn supported the main news-gathering activities.
\nSomewhere along the way though, the idea somehow became that every reader ought to be able to read every story. Pitching everything at an eighth grade reading level worked for a while. But if you print bland dumbed-down stories about culture, the readers who actually know something about culture are going to be the first to jump ship. Isn’t that alienating the very readers you’re trying to reach? The problem with that famous A1 NYT Brittney Spears story was not that it was Brittney Spears on A1 but that it was just plain dumb.
\nProbably every newspaper in America is rethinking how it covers culture as newspapers ride a long slow decline in print circulation. Sadly, the solution at the vast majority of papers is to parade a succession of bland pop-culture features guaranteed to turn off anyone who actually knows something about the topic. This also means that more traditional cultural coverage gets cut back and blanderized.
\nGood critics are leaving the profession at an alarming rate because the kind of product they’re being asked to write isn’t interesting to them. And sadly, the dumbing-down strategy isn’t working to attract new readers, anyway.
\nInterest in culture has never been higher. Audiences have never been bigger. Yet outside of about a dozen major newspapers, cultural coverage has been cut back and bland increasingly rules. One of the few places where this isn’t generally true is the Times, which has expanded the resources it devotes to covering culture. I realize the Times is in a class by itself as a national paper, but I also assume the paper wouldn’t be taking culture seriously if there wasn’t a good business reason too. is there something the Times knows about cultural coverage that others don’t? Maybe related to that – you were the Times first pop music critic. Is it significant that the paper chose someone for the job who came with high-culture cred?
\nLastly – one observation related to your comment about bland corporate culture. I’ve always found it weirdly fascinating by the way many of America’s most established corporations advertise. They try to convince people that if you use their products you’re being a rebel or individual or different, when in fact their fare is the most common, least individual and least rebellious. The spirit of the 60s has been corporatized and repackaged and co-opted as an ideal, turned into a Disney ride.
\nDigital distribution has given people almost infinite choice, and it turns out that they have very individual taste when they’re given choices as per Chris Anderson’s LongTail observations. Some are asking whether we need critics anymore, when everyone armed with an opinion can express it on the internet. I’m of the opinion that as choices become more overwhelming and information overload sets in, that critics are more valuable than ever. The question Dr. Rockwell, is how do we make a new system that can support them?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
John: We’re getting close to the end of our conversation, but there are still things I wanted to ask you. One, which you bring up in your last post is about how cultural coverage is pitched. I get that in a mass-culture world the way to get audiences is to try to appeal to a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-27","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-main","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4ePZm-r","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":35,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2007\/11\/rethinking_mass_culture.html","url_meta":{"origin":27,"position":0},"title":"Rethinking Mass Culture","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"November 15, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"We're consumed by the idea of mass culture. Since television (and before it, radio) brought the immediacy of produced culture into our living rooms, we've treated the power of a massive aggregated audience with awe. That something is popular enough to attain common currency means it has power. Mass culture\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "main"","block_context":{"text":"main","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/main"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2006\/06\/diacritical.html","url_meta":{"origin":27,"position":1},"title":"…diacritical","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"June 18, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"Over the past 60 years the idea of mass culture has taken on a life of its own; this idea that mainstream culture, mainstream media, is so powerful, so pervasive, that it touches every aspect of our lives. Indeed, it's difficult to escape... mass culture - it's everywhere, and leaks\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "about"","block_context":{"text":"about","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/about"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":48,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2007\/11\/a_low_pressure_air_mass.html","url_meta":{"origin":27,"position":2},"title":"A Low Pressure Air Mass…","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"November 16, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"If the power of mass culture is based on the ability to attract a mass audience, then perhaps it's worth looking at the size of the mass. Magazines: People magazine is solidly mass market. In 2006 it had a circulation of 3.8 million. Its rivals Us Weekly sold 1.8 million\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "main"","block_context":{"text":"main","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/main"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":619,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2015\/11\/mass-market-versus-arts.html","url_meta":{"origin":27,"position":3},"title":"The Mass Market Ain’t What It Used To Be (And What That Means For The Arts)","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"November 30, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"What does it mean to \"engage with an audience\"? It's a fundamental question for anyone who makes anything. Whether it's a political party trying to win votes, Coke trying to sell drinks, an entrepreneur trying to sell an idea, or a theatre trying to sell tickets. Whole industries thrive on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "audience"","block_context":{"text":"audience","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/audience"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/1chogfans_t598.jpg?fit=598%2C398&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/1chogfans_t598.jpg?fit=598%2C398&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/1chogfans_t598.jpg?fit=598%2C398&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":47,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2007\/11\/the_rise_of_arts_culture.html","url_meta":{"origin":27,"position":4},"title":"The Rise Of Arts Culture","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"November 21, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Today I want to make an argument about the rise of arts culture. In the 1950s, at the dawn of TV, the medium's pioneers believed that television would be the great democratizer - exposing culture to the masses. The best of the world's culture could be brought into the living\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "main"","block_context":{"text":"main","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/main"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":85,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/caught_in_the_middle_-_who_are.html","url_meta":{"origin":27,"position":5},"title":"Caught In The Middle – Who Are The New Arts Gatekeepers?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"April 12, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Much of the big shift in our culture right now is a re-ordering of power. For the past 50 years, mass culture, fueled by TV, has been a dominant power. When success is measured in millions of eyeballs (or ears), quality is a secondary commodity. Mass culture has permeated the\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 5 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 5 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/04\/caught_in_the_middle_-_who_are.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"middlemancomic.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/middlemancomic.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}