{"id":1252,"date":"2016-12-04T12:21:02","date_gmt":"2016-12-04T20:21:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/?p=1252"},"modified":"2017-01-14T13:24:22","modified_gmt":"2017-01-14T21:24:22","slug":"this-weeks-top-artsjournal-reads-an-artist-identity-crisis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2016\/12\/this-weeks-top-artsjournal-reads-an-artist-identity-crisis.html","title":{"rendered":"This Week’s Top ArtsJournal Reads: An Artist Identity Crisis?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"artsjournalism\"<\/p>\n

This Week: <\/strong>The next wave of arts journalism layoffs begins… Lots of debate about the role of artists in the Trump era… Prominent Canadian artists petition the government to “fix” support for creativity… It’s getting harder to define what “home” is… Is “mindfulness” overrated?<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Three More Big City Newspaper Arts Writers Call It Quits:<\/strong>\u00a0 A new wave of reductions in arts coverage have begun. The social media-ization of news and the way their algorithms decide which stories get seen has been devastating for stories about the arts. Newspapers under pressure to cut can’t be blamed for cutting arts beats. This week The Edmonton Journal<\/a> and Austin Statesman<\/a> announced they had let arts journalists go. And this weekend, Mark Stryker, a stalwart arts writer for the detroit Free Press announced on Facebook he was taking a buyout<\/a>. Look for more, significant cuts in the weeks ahead.<\/li>\n
  2. Artists In The Trump Era – An Identity Crisis?:<\/strong> How are artists responding to the election of Donald Trump? Many are debating what their roles should be: \u201cHistory and our own recent experience suggest that some soul-searching assessment of the limits of our own gestures<\/a>, and some clear-eyed analysis of what\u00a0rhetoric is effective and what is not, is going to be very, very important in the years to come. It will not be\u00a0enough to languish in mythological beliefs about art\u2019s\u00a0value as a humanistic salve, or even to fly the flag for ‘political art’ as a genre.” Others are burrowing into their art. But, “I\u2019m skeptical of the idea <\/a>that a more perfect art can really bring into being a more perfect union. Bernstein makes vague allusions to Kennedy\u2019s presumably political \u201cgoals,\u201d but the only goals he names are musical ones: intensity, beauty, and devotion. Are these really the ultimate aims of musical performance in a time of violent crisis?\u201d \u00a0But Jay Nordlinger, writing in National Review<\/a>, believes that political correctness has hurt the arts’ standing in America. He wonders if insisting that black characters in opera be black or Asian characters in theatre be Asian is a perversion of art. Such \u201cauthenticity\u201d he believes, goes against the very nature of dramatic portrayal\u2026<\/li>\n
  3. \n
    Canadian Artists Petition Government To “Fix” Their Creative Business:<\/strong>\u00a0A thousand prominent artists signed on to the statement<\/a>. They argue that despite their creativity and innovation, many of them are being squeezed out of a marketplace that monetizes digital distribution without fairly paying content creators: \u201cThe middle-class artist is being eliminated from the Canadian economy. Full-time creativity is becoming a thing of the past,\u201d the letter says. \u201cThe carefully designed laws and regulations of the 1990s were intended to ensure that both Canadian creators and technological innovators would benefit from digital developments. We hoped that new technology would enrich the cultural experiences for artists and consumers alike. Unfortunately, this has not happened,\u201d the letter continues.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  4. Home As A Concept – The Definition Of “Home” Is Changing:\u00a0<\/strong>\u201cWhen the technology of the home was more like a tool to augment human muscle power \u2013 a place for the washing machine, the fridge, the boiler \u2013 the home was as a private, bounded space. Now technology is breaking down those boundaries<\/a>. When parents worry about where their children are going (metaphorically) and to whom they\u2019re talking on social media, they\u2019re acknowledging that people can be at home, in their bedrooms, and yet somewhere else simultaneously. Young people seem to be most at home when they are on \u2013 or perhaps \u2018in\u2019 \u2013 their phones, flicking between apps, surfing their social networks.\u201d<\/li>\n
  5. This Idea Of Mindfulness – Sounds Great, But Being Smart Requires A Wider View:<\/strong> \u201cThe idea that we should be constantly policing our thoughts away from the past, the future, the imagination or the abstract and back to whatever is happening right now<\/em> has gained traction with spiritual leaders and investment bankers, armchair philosophers and government bureaucrats and human resources departments.\u00a0So does the moment really deserve its many accolades?<\/a>\u201d After all – it’ the ability to look forward and back, to connect ideas and think abstractly that helps us accomplish things.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
    Image: Flickr user See-Ming Lee<\/a><\/span><\/h6>\n

     <\/p>\n