{"id":124,"date":"2009-07-20T17:17:57","date_gmt":"2009-07-20T17:17:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp\/2009\/07\/the_tyranny_of_choice\/"},"modified":"2009-07-20T17:17:57","modified_gmt":"2009-07-20T17:17:57","slug":"the_tyranny_of_choice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/07\/the_tyranny_of_choice.html","title":{"rendered":"The Tyranny of Choice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Choice is good right? Malcom Gladwell does a great talk on how Howard Moskowitz revolutionized marketing by understanding the dynamics of choice. His example here is spaghetti sauce. Traditional marketing strategy had been to get together focus groups and ask them what they liked in a good sauce. Then groups were asked what characteristics they liked in a sauce &#8211; should it be chunky? Zesty? Authentic Italian? The results would be tallied and a sauce that matched the most popular characteristics would be produced.<\/p>\n<p>But this is wrong. The mushy middle is nobody&#8217;s favorite, it&#8217;s merely the version that the most people will tolerate. Furthermore, the characteristics don&#8217;t really match consumers&#8217; true preferences. You&#8217;re asking for opinions which are not based on individual research. People often don&#8217;t know what they want until you tell them and they&#8217;re happier when you do. We know this in the arts. Inspire with something great and unexpected and people will cheer. Arts organizations that follow the crowd rather than lead are not only less interesting, but they get hooked into a feedback loop that leads to artistic rot. <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">\n<object height=\"326\" width=\"334\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/video.ted.com\/assets\/player\/swf\/EmbedPlayer.swf\" \/><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\" \/><param name=\"wmode\" value=\"transparent\" \/><param name=\"bgColor\" value=\"#ffffff\" \/><param name=\"flashvars\" value=\"vu=http:\/\/video.ted.com\/talks\/embed\/MalcolmGladwell_2004-embed_high.flv&amp;su=http:\/\/images.ted.com\/images\/ted\/tedindex\/embed-posters\/MalcolmGladwell-2004.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=320&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=20\" \/><\/object><\/p>\n<p>Note in Gladwell&#8217;s story that some choice leads to happier customers. For the flip side and a cautionary tale about choice, watch sociologist Barry Shwartz&#8217;s talk about the tyranny of choice. If choice is good and we can more and more get what we want, why do we seem less satisfied with our choices? He suggests that too much choice is paralyzing and leads to incoherent decisions. Choices inflict the work of having to evaluate and choose. Choices set up higher expectations which are difficult to meet. Consequently we are less satisfied. <\/p>\n<p>As an example, Schwartz cites employer 401k plans. When employees are offered few choices they invest in the programs. Plans with a high number of investment choices see much less employee participation, even though the plans directly benefit those who join. Why? Too hard to choose. Fear of making a bad choice results in paralysis.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">\n<object height=\"326\" width=\"334\"><param name=\"movie\" value=\"http:\/\/video.ted.com\/assets\/player\/swf\/EmbedPlayer.swf\" \/><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\" \/><param name=\"wmode\" value=\"transparent\" \/><param name=\"bgColor\" value=\"#ffffff\" \/><param name=\"flashvars\" value=\"vu=http:\/\/video.ted.com\/talks\/embed\/BarrySchwartz_2005G-embed_high.flv&amp;su=http:\/\/images.ted.com\/images\/ted\/tedindex\/embed-posters\/BarrySchwartz-2005G.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=320&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=93\" \/><\/object><\/p>\n<p>Extrapolate this paralysis out to cultural choice. How are you sorting out the noise? We look for trusted guides who can sort it out for us and give us a framework that makes sense. Narrow the choices down to two or three best possibilities and I&#8217;m grateful.&nbsp; This is a dynamic that has tangible currency in the Attention Economy. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Choice is good right? Malcom Gladwell does a great talk on how Howard Moskowitz revolutionized marketing by understanding the dynamics of choice. His example here is spaghetti sauce. Traditional marketing strategy had been to get together focus groups and ask them what they liked in a good sauce. Then groups were asked what characteristics they [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-124","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-uncategorized","7":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4ePZm-20","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":357,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/07\/attention-2.html","url_meta":{"origin":124,"position":0},"title":"Pay Attention! If Selling Tickets Is Your Business Model, You&#039;ve Got A Problem","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"July 13, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Another lifetime ago we were in the Manufacturing Economy. We made things. Then we were in the Transportation Economy. We outsourced making things and brought whatever we needed to us. Then it was the Experience Economy. We created entertainment around the things we buy (how we justify paying $4.50 for\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 12 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 12 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/07\/attention-2.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"supermarket seizure.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/supermarket%20seizure.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":577,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2015\/04\/why-is-my-hotel-following-me-ah-its-big-data.html","url_meta":{"origin":124,"position":1},"title":"Why Is My Hotel Following Me? (Ah, It&#8217;s Big Data)","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"April 5, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"The hotel I stayed at in San Diego last month has been following me around for weeks. Seriously, it\u2019s getting annoying - a one-night-stand that refuses to recede gracefully into memory. Everywhere I go on the web, it\u2019s there waiting for me, promising me a \u201cgreat location\u00a0in the center of\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"hotel-clipart-hotel-sleeping-accomodation-clip-art-black-white-md","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/hotel-clipart-hotel-sleeping-accomodation-clip-art-black-white-md.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":48,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2007\/11\/a_low_pressure_air_mass.html","url_meta":{"origin":124,"position":2},"title":"A Low Pressure Air Mass&#8230;","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"November 16, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"If the power of mass culture is based on the ability to attract a mass audience, then perhaps it's worth looking at the size of the mass. Magazines: People magazine is solidly mass market. In 2006 it had a circulation of 3.8 million. Its rivals Us Weekly sold 1.8 million\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;main&quot;","block_context":{"text":"main","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/main"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":947,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2016\/08\/is-opera-the-real-21st-century-art-form.html","url_meta":{"origin":124,"position":3},"title":"Is Opera The Real 21st Century Art Form?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"August 2, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"A 2015 survey\u00a0by blogger Mae Mai reported that\u00a0260 new opera companies started since 2000 in the United States. There are 80 opera companies now working in New York alone. Over the past couple months the New York Opera Fest showcased many of the New York companies.\u00a0For the most part, these\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;arts &amp; tech&quot;","block_context":{"text":"arts &amp; tech","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/category\/arts-tech"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/13-17-brainTraffic.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/13-17-brainTraffic.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/13-17-brainTraffic.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/13-17-brainTraffic.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/13-17-brainTraffic.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":346,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/03\/you_know_youre_in_trouble_when-2.html","url_meta":{"origin":124,"position":4},"title":"You Know You&#039;re In Trouble When You&#039;re Just A Can Of Peas","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"March 29, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Interactivity has been redefined in the past few years. Newspapers used to think they were interactive because they ran letters to the editor. Rarely did they respond to the letters (unless those letters demanded a correction), but \"hearing from the readers\" became a mantra for the focus-group-driven news organization.Arts organizations\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"social-media-people.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/social-media-people.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":101,"url":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/05\/how_perfection_killed_classica.html","url_meta":{"origin":124,"position":5},"title":"Is Perfection Killing Classical Music?","author":"Douglas McLennan","date":"May 3, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Not literally, of course, at least not yet. The ability to edit and fix recordings has long conditioned audiences to expect that the music we hear should be perfect. Has it changed the way performers play in live concert? The role of recordings in the music business has changed. Once,\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 9 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 9 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/2009\/05\/how_perfection_killed_classica.html#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"recording.jpg","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/recording.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.artsjournal.com\/diacritical\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}